A huge assault on our culture by the liberals. Orwell's nightmare is becoming a reality.
1 posted on
03/17/2009 6:15:25 PM PDT by
Jeb21
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-39 next last
To: Jeb21
Well that’s just doubleplusungood.
2 posted on
03/17/2009 6:17:11 PM PDT by
Sir Gawain
("Let every man make known what kind of government would command his respect")
To: Jeb21
I am sure Daniel Webster would be jumping for joy over this.
3 posted on
03/17/2009 6:17:41 PM PDT by
Reagan79
(Ralph Stanley & The Clinch Mountain Boys)
To: Jeb21
Take a class in lexicography some time, and you'll understand why the new definition is there.
BTW, the definition in question is the second definition, not the first.
Check an unabridged dictionary, and you'll find a lot of words that are offensive, but are in the dictionary.
You will also find the word, "ain't"
To: Jeb21
Who cares what the leftists writing Webster’s dictionary think?
To: Jeb21
There is another word I bet that they do not have. Heterophobia!
7 posted on
03/17/2009 6:23:13 PM PDT by
2ndClassCitizen
(NAACP=Nubians Against All Caucasian People)
To: Jeb21
God had an ultimate plan for the ‘woo woo’ and the ‘wee wee’.....to procreate. ‘Little bundles of joy’ cannot be created in a rectum. JMHO (brutal, tho it is.) ;)
9 posted on
03/17/2009 6:27:08 PM PDT by
RushIsMyTeddyBear
(Obama dozed.....people froze.)
To: Jeb21
Now look in the dictionary to see if you can find the word “feminazi.”
10 posted on
03/17/2009 6:30:42 PM PDT by
Ge0ffrey
To: Jeb21
Looked up the word Messiah and guess who's picture I saw...
11 posted on
03/17/2009 6:32:53 PM PDT by
topfile
To: Jeb21
Marriage descends from Matrimonium therefore the definition is now incorrect according to it’s original meaning, which is to signify the inheritance of children arising from the union of a man and woman.
MATRIMONIUM. By this word is understood the inheritance descending to a man, ex parti matris. It is but little used.
2. Among the Romans this word was employed to signify marriage; and it was so called because this conjunction was made with the design that the wife should become a mother. Inst. 1, 9, 1.
To: Jeb21
14 posted on
03/17/2009 6:36:50 PM PDT by
Mojave
(Don't blame me. I voted for McClintock.)
To: Jeb21
God, I believe, has his own dictionary and I don’t think it would agree with Webster’s version. ;-)
16 posted on
03/17/2009 6:48:44 PM PDT by
doc1019
(and a child shall lead them)
To: Jeb21
Our brave new world will continue to co-opt the language.
To: Jeb21
Well why shouldn’t they?
Heck, 3/4 of FReepers (mis)use the word to describe pervert joinings.
19 posted on
03/17/2009 7:06:29 PM PDT by
LearsFool
("Thou shouldst not have been old, till thou hadst been wise.")
To: Jeb21
OBAMA MADE ME DO IT........
20 posted on
03/17/2009 7:07:33 PM PDT by
Stayfree
(HELP US EXPOSE THE "REAL" BIRTH CERTIFICATE @ REWARD FOR OBAMA'S BIRTH CERTIFICATE.COM!)
To: Jeb21
Hey Webster's. The Lord God Almighty defines it. One man and one woman...end of topic.
22 posted on
03/17/2009 7:12:57 PM PDT by
444Flyer
(Don't beLIEve Obama.............................Never give up, never give in, never give out!)
To: Jeb21
I think that America should just GIVE them the word "marriage" if they want it so damn bad.
Then the rest of the country can move along to "narriage" or something.
What would they do?
24 posted on
03/17/2009 7:14:46 PM PDT by
Miss Behave
(When seconds count, the cops take minutes.)
To: Jeb21
25 posted on
03/17/2009 7:15:06 PM PDT by
Radix
(22;22 EST, 13 Feb 2009, C-Span2, Silent wait for Sen to come bury USA after burying his Mom)
To: Jeb21
No problemo - I’ve just bought my last Webster’s dictionary. Forever.
27 posted on
03/17/2009 7:17:37 PM PDT by
GOPJ
(CEO:Chief Embezzlement Officer- CFO:Corporate Fraud Officer-CASH FLOW: money down the toilet.)
To: Jeb21
Isn't Webster's the "accept all changes to the language without question" dictionary?
Pfffft.
Makes it rather useless as a dictionary then, doesn't it?
30 posted on
03/17/2009 7:25:09 PM PDT by
TChris
(So many useful idiots...)
To: Jeb21
Boycott Webster! The book is now formally heretical and should not be read by Christians.
32 posted on
03/17/2009 7:33:19 PM PDT by
cmj328
(Filibuster FOCA or lose reelection)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-39 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
