Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Jeb21
Take a class in lexicography some time, and you'll understand why the new definition is there.

BTW, the definition in question is the second definition, not the first.

Check an unabridged dictionary, and you'll find a lot of words that are offensive, but are in the dictionary.

You will also find the word, "ain't"

5 posted on 03/17/2009 6:20:41 PM PDT by Military family member (GO Colts!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Military family member
You will also find the word, "ain't"

Indeed. That bygone phrase, "Ain't isn't a word!" was always hogwash to me. I tell my kids that if you can say it and it has meaning to you then it is a word.
52 posted on 03/18/2009 5:03:18 AM PDT by stentorian conservative (FUBO!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Military family member

The short answer is that dictionaries are both descriptive and prescriptive, always with an uneasy balance between the two. You can argue that the word “marriage” *should* not be used to describe same-sex unions, but you cannot argue that it *is* not being so used.


94 posted on 03/19/2009 2:03:11 AM PDT by ReignOfError
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson