I must disagree, Steele has not had a chance to select a staff or fill any of the other posts in the RNC, to fire him now would appear unserious and Amateurish.
You forgot the /s right?
Really?And just how many years would you say is enough?The guy is a rino of the first order.
Re-read his responses in the GQ article. He doesn’t believe in the platform of the party he pretends to represent! To allow him to stay on would not only appear, but would BE, the definition of “unserious”.
Right from the horses a$$:
And in an interview with Gentleman’s Quarterly, he (Steele)really stepped in it when he said that abortion was “an individual choice.”
Q: Should people have access to buy assault weapons?
A Steele: Society should draw lines. What do you need an assault weapon for, if you're going hunting? That's overkill.
Who is the amateur?
You are an idiot or a shill - in either case your position is wrong and stupid.
To keep him would appear unserious and Amateurish...and unwilling to admit and correct mistakes.
What does he have to do? Wear size 58 shoes, a red nose, and climb out of an itty bitty car with the rest of his likeminded cohorts?
Not only does the RNC chairman not seem to share the values of his party, or to even agree with his party's platform, but also he is a public relations disaster. The diversionary noise he has created has not only hurt Republicans, but it has helped the president move his ambitious agenda without being seriously publicly challenged.Star nails it here. Steele's incompetence as head of the RNC is helping Zero advance his marxist agenda. We can't afford to give Steele more time to figure it out.