Posted on 03/15/2009 9:07:09 PM PDT by llevrok
March 13, 2009: For five years, the U.S. Marine Corps has been using its own battlefield Internet, based on off-the-shelf equipment. Late last year, the U.S. Army tried out the marine approach, and found that it worked.
This all began when the marines went to war in Iraq in 2003. There they quickly discovered that their radio equipment was not up to the needs of fast moving mechanized warfare. That's understandable, as Iraq was the first time the marines ever had to advance so quickly, and so far inland, during combat. Taking this as the wave of the future, and lacking the money for a lot of expensive new communications gear, the marines came up with CONDOR (Command and Control on the Move Network, Digital Over the Horizon Relay). Basically, CONDOR equips each marine battalion with satellite telephone and encrypted wi-fi gear, as well as networking hardware for all sorts of marine radios. The satellite link means that no battalion is ever out of range of radio or Internet communication. Most marine radios are "line of sight" (FM) and are of limited range. When units spread out too far, they lose radio contact unless they have satellite phones. The marines got satellite phones and satellite based communications gear from the army during the Iraq campaign. This proved a lifesaver.
But CONDOR went one step further by establishing wi-fi nodes throughout the battalion area, and also collects and transmits data from the EPLRS (locator transmitters) that every vehicle carries. The problem with EPLRS was that it used a line of sight signal (unlike the army Blue Force Tracker, which used satellite communications). CONDOR transmits EPLRS data to all marine units in the area, thus allowing a division commander to see where all his vehicles and troops are, even if they are hundreds of kilometers apart. CONDOR also allows any radio in the battalion to use the satellite link to call anywhere in the worldwide marine communications network.
But what really got the army's attention was how CONDOR provided Internet connections for everyone in the battalion. EPLRS has Internet capability built into it, but troops don't always turn it on. During last years army test, the EPLRS Internet feature was heavily used, along with troposcatter radio (signals are sent straight up, and they bounce off the troposphere back to other radios) to connect EPLRS units that are not within line-of-sight of each other. As the marines discovered, this works quite well.
Everyone was happy, except the contractors and bureaucrats trying to get the JTRS radio system to work. Since the 1990s, this distance and communications problem, as well as the need for battlefield Internet, had been foreseen. A new family of radios (JTRS) were developed to deal with it. But JTRS underwent one delay after another, and won't be available for another year or two (a phrase that has been overused with regard to JTRS). So EPLRA can fill in until JTRS arrives. CONDOR and EPLRS are more examples of how new technology is being developed so quickly that the usual Department of Defense way of developing new gear is often overtaken by faster evolving civilian equipment. No one expected satellite phones and wi-fi to come to market as quickly as they did. But here they are, and they will fill in until the official solution, JTRS, catches up.
You’ve obviously never read Brute Krulak’s “First to Fight”.
“Improvise, adapt, overcome.” Anyway, the alternative would have been to do without FR... ;-)
Fight Smarter not Harder.
Very cool! It sounds like using modified/hardened off-the-shelf technology saved years of time, million of dollars, and probably lives.
>You’ve obviously never read Brute Krulak’s “First to Fight”.
Isn’t that an Army [unit’s] slogan? I seem to remember reading about an infantry unit...
“...along with troposcatter radio (signals are sent straight up, and they bounce off the troposphere back to other radios) to connect EPLRS units that are not within line-of-sight of each other. As the marines discovered, this works quite well.”
Sounds like NVIS transmissions on the 40 meter band (Near Vertical Incidence Skywave). It works quite well over 500 or so mile range with no coverage holes.
Thought you might want to pass this to Groom.
www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2207342/posts?page=1
Good to know that they’re resourceful and that it worked well. The question is, could consumer equipment be used to attack their communications, and is the encryption they use strong enough?
(( ping ))
I have always admired the Marines for their innovation and ingenuity (besides the obvious honor, commitment, and courage). Improvisation is a way of life for them.
The Army, Navy, and Air Force make elaborate budgets and grand multi-billion, multi-year acquisitions.
The Marines say “We need some new X, we will take whatever money you want to give us and we’ll make do.” And in doing so, they come up with some of the simplest, cheapest, and effective systems that do exactly what they need.
Using the roads and airstrips Army engineers built for them.
Marines are also a tenth of the Army’s size.
Easier to improvise on a small scall...
all we need is a Radio Shack nearby and some chicken wire........
But does the equipment meet MIL-SPEC 610A, 586B, etc, etc, etc?
I used to tote a AN/PRC-104 HF rig. $5 grand a copy, 20 watts.
Folks used to ask if it was over priced and so on.
I could sit the rig in the snow, let it cold soak at -50 (and in a couple of cases minus 80) for 12 hours. I knew I could light it up, tune to a contact frequency and be on frequency and with full power.
So, ya, it was worth the bucks.
Cheap COTS is OK. The real question is - are you willing to bet YOUR life on it?
Unless, the Tropo systems the marines use are very different than the ones the army use, they do not point them straight up, it woul defeat the purpose. You have to angle bounce the signal off of the troposphere, and it a rather narrow angle, using hyperbolic antennas.
Scrap JRTS, adopt the Marine’s system, standardize on it.
The Marines got short shrifted on attack choppers years back as well so they made their own...same for tanks for awhile.
Quality over quantity comes to mind?
The Few, The Proud!
Thanks for the ping, Lancey
“Cheap, working, and available now though with some imperfections” beats “expensive, perfect, but not available for the next few years” every single time. If it prevents even one friendly fire incident while waiting for the “new radios” it’s worth it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.