Skip to comments.
China condemns US warship deployment as tensions mount
The Times(UK) ^
| 03/13/09
| Jane Macartney and Tim Reid
Posted on 03/13/2009 1:31:22 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster
China condemns US warship deployment as tensions mount
Jane Macartney in Beijing and Tim Reid in Washington
Chinese Navy officers reacted with annoyance today when it emerged that the United States had sent a destroyer to back up a surveillance vessel in the South China Sea after it was harassed by Peoples Liberation Army (PLA) sailors.
The decision by President Obama to send an armed escort for US surveillance ships in the area follows the aggressive and co-ordinated manoeuvres of five Chinese boats on Sunday. The vessels harassed and nearly collided with the unarmed USNS Impecccable.
One unidentified officer quoted in the China Daily newspaper said that the decision was disproportionate. While Chinas Foreign Ministry has so far kept tight-lipped on the latest development, the decision to run such a comment so swiftly in the state-run English-language newspaper was a signal of Beijings concerns.
One naval source said the PLA had taken note of the latest US move and was watching developments closely.
(Excerpt) Read more at timesonline.co.uk ...
TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 0bama; 0bamaisfailing; china; nobama2012; rookie; skirmish; usnavy; warship
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-84 next last
To: TigerLikesRooster; maui_hawaii; Jeff Head; Tainan; hedgetrimmer; Unam Sanctam; taxesareforever; ...
It this Obama’s pro-Union America-first side overruling anti-military pro-appeasement pro-Wall St. instinct?
2
posted on
03/13/2009 1:34:00 AM PDT
by
TigerLikesRooster
(from "Irrational Exuberance" to "Mark to Zero": from '96 to '09)
To: TigerLikesRooster
Anyway, economy and military affairs are now going to be all rolled up into one.
3
posted on
03/13/2009 1:35:24 AM PDT
by
TigerLikesRooster
(from "Irrational Exuberance" to "Mark to Zero": from '96 to '09)
To: TigerLikesRooster
this has nothing to do with Obama. contrary to popular believe, the President doesn’t run every thing
To: chuck_the_tv_out
Apparently Chinese expert is expressing the similar view. From the article(final passage):
He told the China Daily: Obama seeks cooperation with China. But some hawkish US military officers don't like it, which led to the spat over the sea confrontation."
5
posted on
03/13/2009 1:38:59 AM PDT
by
TigerLikesRooster
(from "Irrational Exuberance" to "Mark to Zero": from '96 to '09)
To: TigerLikesRooster
I'm getting cynical in my old age...
At this point I wouldn't be surprised if all this is being staged to give Obama gravitas in international affairs. A deal made between Hillary and the Chinese...
6
posted on
03/13/2009 1:39:11 AM PDT
by
DB
To: TigerLikesRooster
Who knows, maybe Obama is smart enough to listen to his Generals here.
7
posted on
03/13/2009 1:41:27 AM PDT
by
valkyry1
To: DB
Thats another consideration also.
8
posted on
03/13/2009 1:42:21 AM PDT
by
valkyry1
To: TigerLikesRooster
I am sure we will now be innundated with posts telling us how “great it is to Free Trade with Communist China”.
Yeah, right....
9
posted on
03/13/2009 1:42:37 AM PDT
by
UCFRoadWarrior
(The Biggest Threat To American Soverignty Is Rampant Economic Anti-Americanism)
To: DB
Two countries working together to stage an international incident for domestic consumption does happen, even though we are not sure this one qualifies.
10
posted on
03/13/2009 1:43:27 AM PDT
by
TigerLikesRooster
(from "Irrational Exuberance" to "Mark to Zero": from '96 to '09)
To: TigerLikesRooster
From Obama or not, this is a move in the right direction for America. There is no peace without strength. And all the strength is useless unless your enemy sees it before he decides to go ahead with his misadventure. As the Chinese themselves believe, “if you are fighting a battle, you have already lost” or something like that. I think it will be best to put China swiftly in its place-within 12 nautical miles of its coastline.
I think they are testing US-resolve to see if the time is ripe for a move on Taiwan. America’s response will tell them that it is not.
11
posted on
03/13/2009 1:43:47 AM PDT
by
MimirsWell
(Scipio Pakistanus)
To: UCFRoadWarrior
And the chant of “Death to Gold.” :-)
12
posted on
03/13/2009 1:44:11 AM PDT
by
TigerLikesRooster
(from "Irrational Exuberance" to "Mark to Zero": from '96 to '09)
To: TigerLikesRooster
Actually, that's warships--plural, and quite a few of them. (
see comment #14)
US warships head for South China Sea after standoff From The Times ^ | March 12, 2009 | Tim Reid in Washington
Excerpt of excerpt:
"
US warships head for South China Sea after standoffTim Reid in Washington A potential conflict was brewing last night in the South China Sea after President Obama dispatched heavily armed American destroyers to the scene of a naval standoff between the US and China at the weekend."
13
posted on
03/13/2009 1:46:10 AM PDT
by
familyop
(As painful as the global laxative might be, maybe our "one world" needs a good cleaning.)
To: TigerLikesRooster
14
posted on
03/13/2009 1:47:10 AM PDT
by
familyop
(combat engineer (combat), National Guard, '89-'96, Duncan Hunter or no-vote, http://falconparty.com/)
To: familyop
Now the local bully is whimpering because he unwittingly bit off more than he can ever chew. Nice - I’d like to see this happen to China more often.
15
posted on
03/13/2009 1:48:31 AM PDT
by
MimirsWell
(Scipio Pakistanus)
To: TigerLikesRooster
Maybe China was hoping for easy pickings, like with the spy plane they downed early in the Bush administration.
-PJ
16
posted on
03/13/2009 1:55:49 AM PDT
by
Political Junkie Too
(You can never overestimate the Democrats' ability to overplay their hand.)
To: TigerLikesRooster
I heard that when the Impecccable doused the Chinese boats with water the crews striped to their underwear and put Wal*Mart shopping bags over their heads to keep their hair dry.
17
posted on
03/13/2009 1:57:03 AM PDT
by
BigCinBigD
('When a man believes that any stick will do, he at once picks up a boomerang,')
To: TigerLikesRooster
We actually (GASP!) responded? Color me shocked!
18
posted on
03/13/2009 1:58:05 AM PDT
by
tanuki
(The only color of a leader that should matter is the color of his spine.)
To: MimirsWell
And very sincerely, it’s a great day to have friends in India :-)
19
posted on
03/13/2009 1:58:59 AM PDT
by
familyop
(combat engineer (combat), National Guard, '89-'96, Duncan Hunter or no-vote, http://falconparty.com/)
To: TigerLikesRooster
It can’t be the fault of BushCheneyHaliburtonIraqWotGuantanamo. Who could be blamed for these “tensions”?
20
posted on
03/13/2009 2:01:49 AM PDT
by
Dallas59
("You know the one with the big ears? He might be yours, but he ain't my president.")
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-84 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson