Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

China condemns US warship deployment as tensions mount
The Times(UK) ^ | 03/13/09 | Jane Macartney and Tim Reid

Posted on 03/13/2009 1:31:22 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster

China condemns US warship deployment as tensions mount

Jane Macartney in Beijing and Tim Reid in Washington

Chinese Navy officers reacted with annoyance today when it emerged that the United States had sent a destroyer to back up a surveillance vessel in the South China Sea after it was harassed by People’s Liberation Army (PLA) sailors.

The decision by President Obama to send an armed escort for US surveillance ships in the area follows the aggressive and co-ordinated manoeuvres of five Chinese boats on Sunday. The vessels harassed and nearly collided with the unarmed USNS Impecccable.

One unidentified officer quoted in the China Daily newspaper said that the decision was disproportionate. While China’s Foreign Ministry has so far kept tight-lipped on the latest development, the decision to run such a comment so swiftly in the state-run English-language newspaper was a signal of Beijing’s concerns.

One naval source said the PLA had taken note of the latest US move and was watching developments closely.

(Excerpt) Read more at timesonline.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 0bama; 0bamaisfailing; china; nobama2012; rookie; skirmish; usnavy; warship
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-84 next last

1 posted on 03/13/2009 1:31:22 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster; maui_hawaii; Jeff Head; Tainan; hedgetrimmer; Unam Sanctam; taxesareforever; ...
It this Obama’s pro-Union America-first side overruling anti-military pro-appeasement pro-Wall St. instinct?
2 posted on 03/13/2009 1:34:00 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster (from "Irrational Exuberance" to "Mark to Zero": from '96 to '09)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

Anyway, economy and military affairs are now going to be all rolled up into one.


3 posted on 03/13/2009 1:35:24 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster (from "Irrational Exuberance" to "Mark to Zero": from '96 to '09)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

this has nothing to do with Obama. contrary to popular believe, the President doesn’t run every thing


4 posted on 03/13/2009 1:35:34 AM PDT by chuck_the_tv_out
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: chuck_the_tv_out
Apparently Chinese expert is expressing the similar view. From the article(final passage):

He told the China Daily: “Obama seeks cooperation with China. But some hawkish US military officers don't like it, which led to the spat over the sea confrontation."

5 posted on 03/13/2009 1:38:59 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster (from "Irrational Exuberance" to "Mark to Zero": from '96 to '09)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster
I'm getting cynical in my old age...

At this point I wouldn't be surprised if all this is being staged to give Obama gravitas in international affairs. A deal made between Hillary and the Chinese...

6 posted on 03/13/2009 1:39:11 AM PDT by DB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

Who knows, maybe Obama is smart enough to listen to his Generals here.


7 posted on 03/13/2009 1:41:27 AM PDT by valkyry1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DB

Thats another consideration also.


8 posted on 03/13/2009 1:42:21 AM PDT by valkyry1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

I am sure we will now be innundated with posts telling us how “great it is to Free Trade with Communist China”.

Yeah, right....


9 posted on 03/13/2009 1:42:37 AM PDT by UCFRoadWarrior (The Biggest Threat To American Soverignty Is Rampant Economic Anti-Americanism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DB

Two countries working together to stage an international incident for domestic consumption does happen, even though we are not sure this one qualifies.


10 posted on 03/13/2009 1:43:27 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster (from "Irrational Exuberance" to "Mark to Zero": from '96 to '09)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

From Obama or not, this is a move in the right direction for America. There is no peace without strength. And all the strength is useless unless your enemy sees it before he decides to go ahead with his misadventure. As the Chinese themselves believe, “if you are fighting a battle, you have already lost” or something like that. I think it will be best to put China swiftly in its place-within 12 nautical miles of its coastline.

I think they are testing US-resolve to see if the time is ripe for a move on Taiwan. America’s response will tell them that it is not.


11 posted on 03/13/2009 1:43:47 AM PDT by MimirsWell (Scipio Pakistanus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: UCFRoadWarrior

And the chant of “Death to Gold.” :-)


12 posted on 03/13/2009 1:44:11 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster (from "Irrational Exuberance" to "Mark to Zero": from '96 to '09)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster
Actually, that's warships--plural, and quite a few of them. (see comment #14)

US warships head for South China Sea after standoff
From The Times ^ | March 12, 2009 | Tim Reid in Washington

Excerpt of excerpt:

"US warships head for South China Sea after standoffTim Reid in Washington A potential conflict was brewing last night in the South China Sea after President Obama dispatched heavily armed American destroyers to the scene of a naval standoff between the US and China at the weekend."


13 posted on 03/13/2009 1:46:10 AM PDT by familyop (As painful as the global laxative might be, maybe our "one world" needs a good cleaning.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

...fleets.


14 posted on 03/13/2009 1:47:10 AM PDT by familyop (combat engineer (combat), National Guard, '89-'96, Duncan Hunter or no-vote, http://falconparty.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: familyop

Now the local bully is whimpering because he unwittingly bit off more than he can ever chew. Nice - I’d like to see this happen to China more often.


15 posted on 03/13/2009 1:48:31 AM PDT by MimirsWell (Scipio Pakistanus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster
Maybe China was hoping for easy pickings, like with the spy plane they downed early in the Bush administration.

-PJ

16 posted on 03/13/2009 1:55:49 AM PDT by Political Junkie Too (You can never overestimate the Democrats' ability to overplay their hand.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster
I heard that when the Impecccable doused the Chinese boats with water the crews striped to their underwear and put Wal*Mart shopping bags over their heads to keep their hair dry.
17 posted on 03/13/2009 1:57:03 AM PDT by BigCinBigD ('When a man believes that any stick will do, he at once picks up a boomerang,')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

We actually (GASP!) responded? Color me shocked!


18 posted on 03/13/2009 1:58:05 AM PDT by tanuki (The only color of a leader that should matter is the color of his spine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MimirsWell

And very sincerely, it’s a great day to have friends in India :-)


19 posted on 03/13/2009 1:58:59 AM PDT by familyop (combat engineer (combat), National Guard, '89-'96, Duncan Hunter or no-vote, http://falconparty.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

It can’t be the fault of BushCheneyHaliburtonIraqWotGuantanamo. Who could be blamed for these “tensions”?


20 posted on 03/13/2009 2:01:49 AM PDT by Dallas59 ("You know the one with the big ears? He might be yours, but he ain't my president.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-84 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson