Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Dr. Bogus Pachysandra

Found an explanation:

Kenneth G. Wilson (1923–). The Columbia Guide to Standard American English. 1993.

inalienable, unalienable (adjs.)

These two exact synonyms are still Standard, but inalienable, though a trifle younger than unalienable (both are seventeenth century words) is the more common today. Things inalienable [unalienable] cannot be given away, transferred, or otherwise removed.


7 posted on 03/12/2009 10:57:50 AM PDT by MrB (The 0bamanation: Marxism, Infanticide, Appeasement, Depression, Thuggery, and Censorship)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: MrB

It was the original draft in Jefferson’s handwriting that used “inalienable.”
http://www.ushistory.org/Declaration/unalienable.htm
As both words have the same meaning, I wonder why “un” was chosen over the original “in?” The “in” version rolls off the tongue easier, in my opinion, errr,, un my opinion!


10 posted on 03/12/2009 11:17:13 AM PDT by Dr. Bogus Pachysandra ( Ya can't pick up a turd by the clean end!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson