Skip to comments.
So What's in the Stimulus for You? Nothing!
Forbes ^
| March 16, 2009
| Janet Novack
Posted on 03/08/2009 2:45:24 PM PDT by reaganaut1
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-35 last
To: reaganaut1
ZERO, unless you are counting more taxes to pay.
21
posted on
03/08/2009 3:16:07 PM PDT
by
RetiredArmy
(Destruction of the US Economy: Obama's Global War on Prosperity!!!)
To: Deetes
the same for seniors and retirees
22
posted on
03/08/2009 3:21:28 PM PDT
by
alfie
(peace through superior firepower)
To: reaganaut1
So What's in the Stimulus for You? Radio comedy.
23
posted on
03/08/2009 3:23:21 PM PDT
by
humblegunner
(Where my PIE at, fool?)
To: reaganaut1
What’s the world coming to when a single mom with three kids can’t work two jobs without taking a tax hit? Jeez!
24
posted on
03/08/2009 3:24:08 PM PDT
by
Wolfie
To: Centurion2000
'The most dangerous ones are the ones that will look at you calmly while in a rage.'I'm already to that point in several existential aspects. Which is my the missus is reluctant to let me buy any more firearms that hold a clip. And I can dig her perspective.
25
posted on
03/08/2009 3:25:00 PM PDT
by
Viking2002
(The Occupation has begun. God help America.)
To: Lorianne
Indeed. There will be a lot of underground economic activity.
Socialism is essentially rationing. The government determines how much of something you will get. 0bama is going to institute de facto rationing through a repressive tax & spend policy. His list of rationed commodities is pervasive.
Electricity
Gasoline
Credit
Income
Health Care
Education
Housing
Travel
Entertainment
Information
Not on the list yet but soon to appear will be food and justice.
What ALWAYS happens when you ration?
Black Market.
26
posted on
03/08/2009 3:31:39 PM PDT
by
henkster
(0bamanomics: "I'll loan you all the money you need to get out of debt.")
To: ari-freedom
We're a top 20% median income household - throw in a low cost of living for the region, and we ain't millionaires, but we ain't destitute by a long shot. It's called hard work. However, regardless of whether those 'idiots' who voted for Obama were 'rich' or not, I have my own plans for capitalizing off of the sonsofbitches who put him there.
27
posted on
03/08/2009 3:32:31 PM PDT
by
Viking2002
(The Occupation has begun. God help America.)
To: Paladin2
Hell, I already swallow a fistful of pills for the BP. My daddy was the clinical template for 'Type A personality disorder', and I carry it in my DNA. It's taken a lifetime of discipline to keep from climbing the proverbial Texas Tower and making someone's day interesting.
28
posted on
03/08/2009 3:35:28 PM PDT
by
Viking2002
(The Occupation has begun. God help America.)
To: reaganaut1
29
posted on
03/08/2009 3:56:29 PM PDT
by
rhema
("Break the conventions; keep the commandments." -- G. K. Chesterton)
To: reaganaut1
Exactly! I don’t work outside of the house b/c of the tax code...I’d basically be working and then handing over my money to the government...no thanks! And the so called feminists are no where to be found....
30
posted on
03/08/2009 3:58:22 PM PDT
by
socialismisinsidious
( The socialist income tax system turns US citizens into beggars or quitters!)
To: reaganaut1; M. Espinola
Just my persoanl opinion:
What government ought to be pushing is for a special stimulus package for American citizens.
Under this proposal the US Treasury would print special vouchers. People would have to prove they are eligible by means of photo identification and Social Security cards. The vouchers would not be transferable except with special permission of the government (e.g. death of a spouse or inheritance).
All qualified individuals would get up to $ 30,000 in vouchers. The vouchers could be used only for the purchase of goods and services made or rendered in the U.S. Immediately disqualified are foreign workers here illegally.
This would encourage people to buy products and support domestic business. Example: Husband and wife decide to buy a new car. They may use vouchers for this purchase. This would obviously have the effect of stimulating the U.S. economy. Benefits would flow into the system immediately. Many jobs would be saved.
This proposal would probably be less expensive than lending billions to banks and insurance companies which are only going to fail anyway (Example: AIG).
31
posted on
03/08/2009 4:02:04 PM PDT
by
ex-Texan
(Ecclesiastes 5:10 - 20)
To: rhema
32
posted on
03/08/2009 4:03:30 PM PDT
by
timestax
(CNNLIES..BIG TIME)
To: ex-Texan
Market prognostication for the second week of March, 2009:
Get ready for a record breaking week.
33
posted on
03/08/2009 4:27:53 PM PDT
by
M. Espinola
(Freedom is not 'free'.)
To: Viking2002
Look in the Recovery Act to see where the money is going, then apply for it. I’m setting up businesses to recover what they’re stealing from me.
34
posted on
03/08/2009 4:42:09 PM PDT
by
Kirkwood
To: reaganaut1
No soup for you!!! But you must pay for the soup of those who do not want to pay for their own! signed, The Soup Nazi
35
posted on
03/08/2009 8:22:43 PM PDT
by
TheConservativeParty
(Democrats are bastard coated bastards with bastard filling.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-35 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson