Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The 'Other Gitmo': Obama backs Bush on key terrorist detention policy
The Weekly Standdard ^ | March 6, 2009 | Stephanie Hessler

Posted on 03/06/2009 6:23:34 AM PST by Sergeant Tim

Fadi Al Maqaleh is one of the many "unlawful enemy combatants" being detained by the U.S. military at Bagram Airbase in Afghanistan. He seeks to challenge his detention in a U.S. court, but recently last week the Obama administration argued that he cannot. Adopting one of the Bush administration's controversial terrorist detention policies, President Obama's Justice Department told a federal court that it had no power to hear the case. ... Judge Bates and the human rights lobby had good reason to expect a different approach. Last fall, while the Bush administration was defending its terrorist detention policies in court, Obama was on the campaign trail condemning them. In one of Obama's most rousing performances during the race, at a town hall event in Farmington Hills, Michigan, he suggested that all people captured by the government have a constitutional right to challenge their detention.

"[I]f the Government grabs you, then you have the right to at least ask, 'Why was I grabbed?' and say, 'Maybe you got the wrong person'.... So the reason that you have this principle is not to be soft on terrorism. It's because that's who we are--that's what we're protecting! Don't mock the Constitution! Don't make fun of it! Don't suggest that it's un-American to abide by what the founding fathers set up--it's worked pretty well for over 200 years"!

(Excerpt) Read more at weeklystandard.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial; Foreign Affairs; Government; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: afghanistan; alqaeda; bagram; barackobama; bush; democrat; democrats; detainees; gitmo; guantanamo; obama; taliban

Protesters attend Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on propsed "truth commission" Wednesday. Note the 'Bagram' sign.

Click on image for related story.

In case you haven't been following it, more that 100,000 Taliban plus an additional 8-14,000 al Qaeda are running around armed and in charge of Pakistan's tribal/federally adminstered areas. Yet the anti-war crowd like those in the photo above think we should fight war as if they are legal actions.

1 posted on 03/06/2009 6:23:35 AM PST by Sergeant Tim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Just Lori; TheForceOfOne; SilvieWaldorfMD; Tennessee Nana; ThreePuttinDude; eastsider; del4hope; ..

Ping!


2 posted on 03/06/2009 6:34:56 AM PST by Sergeant Tim (In the War on Terror, there is no place to run from here.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sergeant Tim

0bami seems uninterested in foreign policy. He gets his kicks socializing domestic policy and taking income/wealth from producers.


3 posted on 03/06/2009 6:37:27 AM PST by Oldeconomybuyer (The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

"Vigil" outside of White House, March 4, 2009.

4 posted on 03/06/2009 6:38:06 AM PST by Sergeant Tim (In the War on Terror, there is no place to run from here.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson