History making, female judge, yada, yada...
Duplicate thread and a dubious source to say the least.
ADN quotes AFC who has no support for their statement.
Not a completely accurate story, she chose the most conservative of the two choices she had, the other option, Smith, was far to the left of Christen. It is also not really determined if Christen was pro-choice. Lots of research on this thread.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2199866/posts
Does Alaska have nukes? Maybe we could all move there and could get protected from the USSA.
it looks like she picked the lesser of two evils...
If this is true as written, it is very bad news for her.
You want to do some interesting research, first, ask yourself why the ‘pro life’ group who leveled these charges would promote Smith who is further to the left on the issue? Take a gander at the network solutions whois data for their website, specifically the owner, then google his name.. Can’t prove anything for sure (I started a thread on this earlier then asked it to be removed until I found more info), his name comes up with some very ‘interesting’ groups.
Something stinks about this whole thing.
It’s hard to believe a card-carrying PP member is the better of two possible choices. Wow.
Is this news reporting or what?
” Former Gov. Frank Murkowski once rejected all three nominees sent to him, then, when the council wouldn’t send him more names, appointed from the list.”
“No vacancies came up during Murkowski’s single term.”
I’m curious, is Smith pro-life?
“A woman AND pro-choice - saraH knocks it out of the park! “
enough of this feminist populism. I want the real conservatism back, the conservatism that didn’t talk about breaking glass ceilings and Title IX. The conservatism that holds that being the best mother to your kids is more important than “having it all.”
Please everyone take the time and read these threads before jumping to conclusions:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2199866/posts
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2199650/posts
Also:
http://www.lifenews.com/state3460.html
Quote:”Governor Palin appointed Daniel Winfree of Fairbanks to replace one of the judges who sided with the majority in overturning the consent statute.
That earned her praise from Alaska Right to Life, the state’s leading pro-life group.”
It is clear that when possible, Gov. Palin picks pro-Life judges. Her first appointment makes the reintroduction of parental consenting possible.
This is nothing but a well designed execution of part of Alinsky’s plan to use your opponents creed against them.
Be ready for more of the same to breed discontent and divide Palin’s support.
She is walking in a perpetual, electoral minefield simply by exercising effective government for the state of Alaska.
Take these words to heart . . .
———— dare to cheat, dare to win ————
. . . this is the one constant you can count on from the marxist opposition.
thaDeetz