Skip to comments.
Obama vs. Limbaugh; The Great Debate Clock
Self-Published (Political Activism)
| March 4, 2009
| Rob Cunningham, Atlanta, GA
Posted on 03/04/2009 3:11:01 PM PST by RobaWho
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-70 next last
One unified mission, one website, one "Great Debate Challenge", with billions of uneducated and mislead people directly exposed to the true meaning of modern American conservatism from "The Great Communicator". This campaign is positive, creative, inexpensive and will serve to leverage established public, private and social networks to bring attention to "The Great Debate Challenge" while reversing the White House/DNC's effort to turn "Rush" into a four letter word.
1
posted on
03/04/2009 3:11:01 PM PST
by
RobaWho
To: RobaWho

His handlers and puppetmasters might not like the odds.
The messiah is not as sharp once off the teleprompter.
The Affirmative Action starts to show.
To: RobaWho
Good idea.
But the new fuhrer is devoid of thoughts and only does what his handlers tell him to do and say what those same eminence grice handlers tell him to say.
he is a black Ted Baxter.
he will never, ever, debate any intelligent person, unless the questions are known and the answers can be scripted.
But maybe we can keep the pressure on him and dog him out of office. And he is so stupid, I am sure we will have an impeachment opportunity very, very soon (assuming he can continue to dodge the fact he is a foreign national).
3
posted on
03/04/2009 3:16:40 PM PST
by
freedumb2003
(Communism comes to America: 1/20/2009. Keep your powder dry, folks.)
To: RobaWho
Rush has punked the Chicago thug bigtime on this. The libtards have been attacking Rush and calling him the leader of the GOP. Shouldn’t the president debate a leader on vital issues.? It will never happen because obama has no stones. No cajones. No cacahuates.
4
posted on
03/04/2009 3:17:48 PM PST
by
shankbear
(Al-Qaeda grew while Monica blew)
To: RobaWho
Rush would likely and reasonably insist on no teleprompters.
Obambi would never even consider having to come up with his own answers against Rush.
5
posted on
03/04/2009 3:18:04 PM PST
by
MrEdd
(Heck? Geewhiz Cripes, thats the place where people who don't believe in Gosh think they aint going.)
To: RobaWho
6
posted on
03/04/2009 3:18:12 PM PST
by
Cyber Ninja
(His legacy is a stain OnTheDress)
To: RobaWho
Ann Coulter weighs in today
7
posted on
03/04/2009 3:19:32 PM PST
by
Syncro
(Play by the rules and you're gonna miss all the fun--Jacky Don Tucker (Toby Keith)
To: freedumb2003
I keep waiting for the SOB Zero to look me in the eye when he gives a speech on TV. But he just keeps ignoring me!
8
posted on
03/04/2009 3:19:56 PM PST
by
Red_Devil 232
(VietVet - USMC All Ready On The Right? All Ready On The Left? All Ready On The Firing Line!)
Whoops, I thought the title said Olbermann!
9
posted on
03/04/2009 3:20:23 PM PST
by
Syncro
(Play by the rules and you're gonna miss all the fun--Jacky Don Tucker (Toby Keith)
To: RobaWho
there has to be somebody on FR who could write a web-debate-countdown-clock to paste all over the blogisphere..
10
posted on
03/04/2009 3:20:32 PM PST
by
xcamel
(The urge to save humanity is always a false front for the urge to rule it. - H. L. Mencken)
To: HowlinglyMind-BendingAbsurdity
I strongly suspect Team Obama see this as a lose-lose proposition for them. Rush has put them between a rock and hard place. If they don't agree to the debate then it looks like they are trying to hide something or avoid something. If they do accept the challenge they probably fear he will be the recipient of a genuine Rush clock-cleaning.
Seems to me though they would be better off to go ahead with it. Sure he'll come off pretty badly, but the people who support him won't care. There's been more than enough evidence to date of just how an empty a suit he is. The dyed-in-the-wool ObamaBots won't know the difference.
Failure to take the challenge leaves it to everyone’s imagination as to why he is declining, not to mention how well he would or wouldn't have done!
Kudos to Rush. I think he has struck a blow for us conservatives.
11
posted on
03/04/2009 3:22:04 PM PST
by
jwparkerjr
(God Bless America!)
To: freedumb2003
You need more Joe the Plumbers - regular Americans, schooled in the principles of freedom...ready, willing and able to question The One, to expose him. Problem is, they control access, and the media who have access are controlled.
12
posted on
03/04/2009 3:24:20 PM PST
by
elk
((A Member of the Silent 58)TM)
To: RobaWho
Not TV, RADIO! That would be the only way!
To: freedumb2003
I totally agree with you, but that's exactly the point, isn't it? The longer this Great Debate Challenge continues unanswered, we'll continue to call him out and expose Obama as devoid of courage, American ideas and common sense values. We win and Rush's credibility, along with the awareness of Conservativism, grows stronger by the day!
14
posted on
03/04/2009 3:27:56 PM PST
by
RobaWho
To: RobaWho
I can read the headlines now ....”The people of the United States held a televised debate between Limbaugh and the President, but the President didn’t show up”.
15
posted on
03/04/2009 3:31:43 PM PST
by
RC2
To: RobaWho
I’m afraid the only “listeners” would be Rush followers....then Carville will create some kind of diversion....like bombing an aspirin factory somewhere in Iraq. I love the idea of a debate because I know where Rush’s heart is and he has nothing to hide. Obama has no heart....and has the Chicago Gang to hide.
To: xcamel
I would like to create a complete website with multiple, free “Great Debate Countdown Timers” of various sizes, easy to understand aspects of conservatism, links to educational sites (Heritage.org) and debunking the top media myths and mis-representations about Conservatism.
17
posted on
03/04/2009 3:34:06 PM PST
by
RobaWho
To: classified
I am strongly in favor of both TV and radio coverage of the debate. We need to see the Oloser sweating and gulping, trembling in irritation as he stutters his memorized talking points... and next to him the Maha Rushie, grinning, whiffing a cigar.
Also TV will reach a larger audience.
18
posted on
03/04/2009 3:36:38 PM PST
by
SolidWood
(Palin: "In Alaska we eat therefore we hunt.")
To: shankbear
Why would any president debate a radio talk show host? If Ed Schultz challenged George W. Bush to debate, would you expect Bush to accept? This is just silly.
To: Red_Devil 232
>>I keep waiting for the SOB Zero to look me in the eye when he gives a speech on TV. But he just keeps ignoring me!<<
Because, uh, he looks. uh, at -— the horizon. Because, uh, it the, uh, future.
20
posted on
03/04/2009 3:37:15 PM PST
by
freedumb2003
(Communism comes to America: 1/20/2009. Keep your powder dry, folks.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-70 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson