Endangered? Try this:
Posted on 03/04/2009 1:59:27 PM PST by AIM Freeper
In today’s edition, The New York Times (AKA: The Sierra Club Newsletter) has a story on Obama’s move to undo a Bush policy that would have allowed federal agencies to proceed with projects without checking with advocates for the snail darter.
Near the end of his administration, President Bush told federal officials they didn’t have to clear it with “scientific experts” in the federal bureaucracy before proceeding with projects that might harm plants or animals protected by the Endangered Species Act.
Naturally, The Times was aghast by Bush’s blatant disregard for the welfare of wildflowers — even with the nation in desperate economic straits.
Its story quoted the Tree-Hugger-in-chief pledging to “help restore the scientific process to its rightful place” in regard to the Endangered Species Act, and declaring that it was “false” to say the nation had to choose between jobs and environmentalism.
(Excerpt) Read more at boycottnyt.com ...
Endangered? Try this:
Objective reporting; New York Times; I thought the two were mutually exclusive.
But at the NY Times objectionable reporting is booming!
These days crocagators are more plentiful than objective reporting.
The Endangered Species Act is a lunatic act that effectively prevents development. The Democrats are totally owned by the so-called “environmental” people.
...at times?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.