Posted on 03/02/2009 11:23:23 AM PST by RushingWater
Rush is addressing the comments directly.
(Excerpt) Read more at rushlimbaugh.com ...
I didn’t call them, but emailed instead, but got a similar response.
“Thank you for contacting the Republican National Committee. We certainly
appreciated your email, and will include your thoughts in our report to
the Chairman. Please do not hesitate to contact us in the future with
any of your thoughts, opinions or observations.
Office of Constituent Services
Republican National Committee”
I'm a woman and I'm not put off by the truth. I know many other women who agree with Rush as well. Any woman who IS put off is weak and has bought into the "feel good mentality" hook line and sinker; that has taken this country down the tubes. We as Americans need to stand by our principles and not allow those that choose to follow the current trend dilute our beliefs. The trend taught to us by the propaganda machine of the left. Those who succeed in life have made usually hard choices.
It's time we hold our leaders feet to the fire, if it's too difficult for them to do the right thing, then we need to change who leads us. We need to make some hard choices now. We don't need to win anyone over by appeasing them we need to LEAD!!!
The last to lead us was Reagan. Like he said about the Dems then, I say about the GOP now. "I didn't leave the party, the party left me"
Blackwell is rock-ribbed and would have been much more solid.
I guess that I was either unclear or possibly confused- I thought that you were sort of accusing the RNC of frontloading the primary sequence of the various states’ primaries with liberal states, which did in fact occur by virtue of the various states own legislative choice, not by any action of the RNC. In actual fact, I have posted my complaint about this very situation, But I can’t see how to blame the RNC for it, or otherwise fix it. What I am saying is the schedule is really not up to the RNC (or DNC), unless I am missing something. It seems to be decided by state legislatures (sort of).
“If con is the opposite of pro, is Congress the opposite of progress?”
Great tagline!
I actually think Rush “plays arrogant” far, far less than he did years ago. And the “twinkle in his eye” is more obvious now too.
Nope. The basic conflict is between those who strive for minimal governance and those who favor European style Socialism.
We must be careful not to crave “unity” at the expense of principles, despite what they teach in public school. “Unity” is a facet of the communist Utopia and directly contradicts the dreams our founding fathers brought to this great country. Ours is a system that relies on individuality, unique differences, diverse opinions and a myriad of religions and cultures.
History proves that a third party can grow and can grow strong. Look back to when the Republican party emerged to oppose the spread of slavery into Kansas in 1855 or so. A single, critical issue birthed the party of Reagan, and a single critical issue can do so again.
The troops looked like they were ordered to go see BHO. I'd not want to see "the one" who I hope doesn't have time to destroy everything.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.