Skip to comments.
Romney's speech at CPAC
Politico ^
| 2/27/2009
| Mitt Romney
Posted on 02/27/2009 3:13:57 PM PST by sevenbak
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 241-252 next last
To: sevenbak
He can never cleanse the stain of being Governor of Massachuttes
21
posted on
02/27/2009 3:38:23 PM PST
by
bert
(K.E. N.P. +12 . John Galt hell !...... where is Francisco dÂ’Anconia)
To: Plutarch
The only people I see bringing up Romney’s religion are Romneys’ supporters.
This, and the fact Romney is a complete fake and a liar, remind me of Obama supporters.
22
posted on
02/27/2009 3:38:32 PM PST
by
MeanWestTexan
(Beware Obama's Reichstag fire.)
To: jeltz25
To: Retired Greyhound
Plus, he never said Rush Limbaugh is an idiot.I don't care if Sanford thinks Limbaugh is an idiot or not. What I care about is Sanford getting bullied by Jennifer Granholm. ON JOBS, no less! LOL pathetic.
24
posted on
02/27/2009 3:39:21 PM PST
by
exist
To: Sudetenland
Better off? Romney could probably get even more of his Liberal agenda through than the empty headed one.
25
posted on
02/27/2009 3:40:16 PM PST
by
Ingtar
(Americans have truly let America down. A sad day.)
To: txnativegop
Actually, he did remarkably well thwarting a 80 percent liberal legislature. He did have to compromise on a few things, but not many. It's the very way he governed such a lib state in such a conservative direction why he would be excellent turning around this liberal leaning country to conservative ideals.
He was received with a thunderous applause at CPAC today. There are many FReepers here who hate the guy, but they, and apparently you live in a neo conservative bubble. Good luck with that.
26
posted on
02/27/2009 3:40:20 PM PST
by
sevenbak
(We wrestle against principalities, powers, rulers of darkness, wickedness in high places.- Eph. 6:12)
To: sevenbak
Odd he failed to mention his magical underpants.
27
posted on
02/27/2009 3:40:30 PM PST
by
humblegunner
(Where my PIE at, fool?)
To: exist
Didn’t see it, so I can’t comment. And I am not necessarily a Sanford supporter.
Bobby Jindal is great in a debate setting, so we won’t have to worry about that.
To: Waryone
Sorry, it was the Mass. supreme court which delivered gay marriage to the state. You might begin with learning the truth. It works much better around here than fabricated arguments that have already been
debunked.
29
posted on
02/27/2009 3:42:11 PM PST
by
Sudetenland
(Victory in 2012...but first Victory in 2010!!!)
To: txnativegop
The GOP already lost their collective minds.
It was called election 2008.
30
posted on
02/27/2009 3:42:42 PM PST
by
sevenbak
(We wrestle against principalities, powers, rulers of darkness, wickedness in high places.- Eph. 6:12)
To: Retired Greyhound
Didnt see it, so I cant comment. And I am not necessarily a Sanford supporter. Bobby Jindal is great in a debate setting, so we wont have to worry about that.
Bobby Jindal is my preference. Hopefully he can recover.
31
posted on
02/27/2009 3:43:37 PM PST
by
exist
To: txnativegop
Your remark is a perfect example of why Free Republic is becoming distasteful to subscribe to. You blurt, before you think!
32
posted on
02/27/2009 3:43:59 PM PST
by
Snapping Turtle
(Slow down and get a grip!)
To: txnativegop
How could you possibly know who “my guy” is? Just because I recognize great words and ideals when I hear them doesn’t mean I have endorsed anyone. I haven’t. I just don’t suffer from the Romney derangement syndrome that seems to be endemic here.
33
posted on
02/27/2009 3:44:46 PM PST
by
Sudetenland
(Victory in 2012...but first Victory in 2010!!!)
To: exist
He will be fine. He will debate well.
So will Palin.
It will be hard to re-introduce her, but she really has an electric quality that candidates need.
To: Ingtar
Your words are empty. Care to provide facts instead of lies?
35
posted on
02/27/2009 3:45:53 PM PST
by
Sudetenland
(Victory in 2012...but first Victory in 2010!!!)
To: sevenbak
To: Sudetenland
Strong on defence: Romney said at the debate Tuesday: You
sit down with your attorneys and tell you want you have to do, but obviously the president of the United States has to do what's in the best interest of the United States to protect us against a potential threat."
Strong on the economy: Supported the billionaire bail-out bull.
Business background he has, but you have to question someone that pays millions per delegate and question their business savvy.
Strong family man - fought for abortion, homosexuality training in schools, and picked extremist Liberal judges.
High moral character? Convictions? The man looks at his watch before deciding what is right.
37
posted on
02/27/2009 3:46:36 PM PST
by
Ingtar
(Americans have truly let America down. A sad day.)
To: sevenbak
If you have to call me a neo conservative, it means that you think that there is a different between a conservative and a neo conservative.
neo conservative is your label, not mine. If you have to use the label, it means you have to mark me as different because I disagree with you.
Only a liberal would label someone and that person’s belief.
38
posted on
02/27/2009 3:46:38 PM PST
by
txnativegop
(God Bless America! (NRA-Endowment))
To: Waryone
Blame the JUDGES. You really are confused or merely spreading disinformation.
To: sevenbak
Actually, the GOP started to slowly lose their collective minds after President Reagan was finished with his second presidential term, IMHO.
40
posted on
02/27/2009 3:46:51 PM PST
by
johnthebaptistmoore
(Conservatives obey the rules. Leftists cheat. Who probably has the political advantage?)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 241-252 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson