Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ex-assemblyman pushes plan to split California into two states
SacBee ^ | Published: Thursday, Feb. 26, 2009 - 12:00 am | E.J. Schultz

Posted on 02/26/2009 9:07:21 PM PST by BenLurkin

The revolution will begin in Visalia – and it will be led by a man named Maze.

As in Bill Maze, a termed-out Assembly member turned rebel who is pushing for California to split in two: the conservative interior as one state and the liberal coast as another.

"We're looking at establishing a breakaway state," he said, with a new government and a new capital. "We'd actually be creating a 51st state."

He is tapping into the anger of farmers and others who say environmental rules and high taxes are sending the state into a tailspin.

"Citizens of our once 'Golden State' are frustrated and desperately concerned about the imposition of burdensome regulations, taxation, fees, fees and more fees, and bureaucratic intrusion into our daily lives and businesses," declares downsizeca.org, the movement's Web site.

Under Maze's plan, 13 coastal counties from Los Angeles to Marin would split from the remaining 45 counties, which the Web site calls "the new revitalized California." To promote the idea, Maze has established a nonprofit group called Citizens for Saving California Farming Industries.

Meanwhile, Maze is selling the plan up and down the state, appearing on television and radio shows. With enough money and momentum, he hopes to put the question before the state's voters. According to the U.S. Constitution, Congress and the state Legislature would have to sign off.

Californians have tried to parcel the state 27 times before, with most attempts never getting far off the ground, said former Republican Assemblyman Stan Statham, who made the last serious attempt in the early 1990s.

The most famous secession movement came in 1941, when several counties in Northern California and southern Oregon tried to form the State of Jefferson – until World War II intervened.

ShareThis

(Excerpt) Read more at sacbee.com ...


TOPICS: US: California
KEYWORDS: calschism; caschism; schism
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-92 next last
To: SoCalPol
Are you trying to say you don't want (San Diego an environs) to be lumped together with L.A.?
41 posted on 02/26/2009 11:05:47 PM PST by BlueDragon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: SAJ

...don’t know ‘bout that other freeper, but i’ll take “libery”, even if it aint got no “t”...


42 posted on 02/26/2009 11:12:05 PM PST by BlueDragon (i didn't capitalize and used a double-negative. do you care? good. neither do i)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Windflier
Splitting away from liberals isn’t going to solve a damn thing

True enough. In the past when we were being taxed unfaily there were those who didn't want a split. They advocated working w/ the governing powers to come to a peaceful conclusion. They were called Tories ;>)

43 posted on 02/26/2009 11:16:15 PM PST by 70times7 (Serving Free Republic's warped and obscure humor needs since 1999)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
Would require Congressional approval.

US Constitution Article IV Section 3

New States may be admitted by the Congress into this Union; but no new States shall be formed or erected within the Jurisdiction of any other State; nor any State be formed by the Junction of two or more States, or parts of States, without the Consent of the Legislatures of the States concerned as well as of the Congress.
...

44 posted on 02/26/2009 11:17:49 PM PST by heleny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BlueDragon

* to be lumped together with L.A.?
...I couldn’t imagine why. $^)

LOL, sort of like being lumped together with the city around 17 miles south of me, Tijuana


45 posted on 02/26/2009 11:20:39 PM PST by SoCalPol (Reagan Republican for Palin - Jindal 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: SoCalPol

Do you get your cell phone number cloned much, by your “south-of-the-border” neighbors? Or have the local providers finally gotten ahead of that game?


46 posted on 02/26/2009 11:25:00 PM PST by BlueDragon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: concentric circles

2008 Presidential, with the proper red=Communist rodent; blue=GOP color scheme (sorry, kids, me no use media newsspeak. I know what red means).

47 posted on 02/26/2009 11:32:31 PM PST by fieldmarshaldj (~"This is what happens when you find a stranger in the Alps !"~~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: SoCalPol

I like that particular division best because of the cultural and economic similarities. People say this never works. This time it might. When, no longer if, we go bankrupt and into a nationwide depression what do we have to lose?


48 posted on 02/26/2009 11:34:54 PM PST by Canticle_of_Deborah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: BlueDragon

I don’t know of anyone with a cell phone who has had that problem.

Anyone in the world who uses a cell phone uses San Diego Technology, Qualcomm


49 posted on 02/26/2009 11:42:18 PM PST by SoCalPol (Reagan Republican for Palin - Jindal 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj

Though San Diego went this time Dem not the norm.

Again, San Diego largest city in the U.S. with a Republican Mayor and 3 of our 5 congressmen are Conservative Republican.

San Diego also has the largest concentration of military in the world.


50 posted on 02/26/2009 11:45:55 PM PST by SoCalPol (Reagan Republican for Palin - Jindal 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Canticle_of_Deborah

yes, a better fit.


51 posted on 02/26/2009 11:49:30 PM PST by SoCalPol (Reagan Republican for Palin - Jindal 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: SoCalPol
What's disturbing is that the False Messiah carried all those solid (at least formerly solid) GOP counties in the South (Riverside, San Diego, San Bernardino) and that further north, that Commie red spread is crawling halfway across the San Joaquin valley and up towards the Sierra foothills. San Diego went for the False Messiah by a 54%-44% margin after going 53-46% for Dubya in '04 (even Orange only went for McCain, 50-48% after it was 60-39% in '04 for Dubya).

Look at 2004 vs 2008 for a side by side comparison. Scary stuff...


52 posted on 02/27/2009 12:09:31 AM PST by fieldmarshaldj (~"This is what happens when you find a stranger in the Alps !"~~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: SoCalPol
Scarier than that is the map from 1980. Back then, just THREE counties went Democrat for President. The predictable San Francisco (which last went GOP for President in 1956), Alameda (containing Oakland/Berkeley) in the East Bay, and moonbat Yolo, which includes the ultraleft enclave of UC-Davis, just adjacent to Sacramento.

28 more years and it's going to be an all-Commie red rodent third world hellhole.

53 posted on 02/27/2009 12:14:39 AM PST by fieldmarshaldj (~"This is what happens when you find a stranger in the Alps !"~~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: AuH2ORepublican

Ping


54 posted on 02/27/2009 5:26:27 AM PST by Impy (RED=COMMUNIST, NOT REPUBLICAN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin; SierraWasp; tubebender

Sounds good.

Of course we would have to send bonded exterminators to clean out Sacramento.

Marin is an incredible left wing elitist enclave.

We would have to block tv signals from Gay Frisco to prevent their lies from seeping out.


55 posted on 02/27/2009 6:15:36 AM PST by Grampa Dave (Zer0's friends are criminals, foreign/domestic terrorists, perverts, sexual deviates or tax cheats!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin; SierraWasp; tubebender; Liz
Then, we can send the Girly Boy Pro Gay/Green/Taxing r Governatoress back to Follywood!


56 posted on 02/27/2009 6:20:45 AM PST by Grampa Dave (Zer0's friends are criminals, foreign/domestic terrorists, perverts, sexual deviates or tax cheats!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Grampa Dave

"Yo, Arnie. Wanna go down the fruit cellar with me, to say hello to Mother?"

57 posted on 02/27/2009 6:56:58 AM PST by Liz (Problem with socialism is you eventually run out of other people*s money. M. Thatcher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: SierraWasp
Never happen, but we might, just might, see the state shifted out of the education, housing and safety net business.

There is a better chance that control of education, housing and public safety can be returned to local government than the state being split in two. After all, even Mexicans in LA County have issues with state government and could be persuaded to vote for regressions.

58 posted on 02/27/2009 9:09:44 AM PST by Amerigomag
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Impy; fieldmarshaldj; Clintonfatigued; Clemenza

California should be split into 5 states, not 2 (the “state names” provided are descriptive, but hardly optimal):

1. State of Los Angeles, with all of L.A. County:

10.0 million pop in 2010, 45%-50% Hispanic, 10% black, 12%-15% Asian

16 electoral votes, 29.17% McCain 2008, 35.60% Bush 2004, 32.35% Bush 2000

2. State of San Francisco Bay, with all of Alameda, Contra Costa, Humboldt, Marin, Mendocino, Monterey, Napa, San Francisco, San Mateo, Santa Clara, Santa Cruz, Solano, Sonoma and Yolo Counties:

8.1 million pop in 2010, 21%-25% Hispanic, 7% black, 17%-20% Asian

13 electoral votes, 24.82% McCain in 2008, 29.95% Bush in 2004, 30.64% Bush in 2000

3. State of Inland Empire, with all of Kern, Riverside, San Bernardino, San Luis Obispo, Santa Barbara and Ventura Counties:

6.7 million pop in 2010, 36%-40% Hispanic, 6% black, 4%-5% Asian

11 electoral votes, 46.79% McCain in 2008, 55.54% Bush in 2004, 50.70% Bush in 2000

4. State of Central Valley, with all of Alpine, Amador, Butte, Calaveras, Colusa, Del Norte, El Dorado, Fresno, Glenn, Inyo, Kings, Lake, Lassen, Madera, Mariposa, Merced, Modoc, Mono, Nevada, Placer, Plumas, Sacramento, San Benito, San Joaquin, Shasta, Sierra, Siskiyou, Stanislaus, Sutter, Tehama, Trinity, Tulare, Tuolumne and Yuba Counties:

6.5 million pop in 2010, 27%-32% Hispanic, 5% black, 7%-8% Asian

11 electoral votes, 48.27% McCain in 2008, 56.92% Bush in 2004, 53.17% Bush in 2000

5. State of San Diego, with all of Imperial, Orange and San Diego Counties:

6.3 million pop in 2010, 30%-35% Hispanic, 4% black, 11%-13% Asian

11 electoral votes, 47.07% McCain in 2008, 55.86% Bush in 2004, 52.57% Bush in 2000

Essentially, comfortably Democrat California would be converted into two ridiculously Democrat states (based in L.A. and San Francisco Bay) and three GOP-leaning states, and under normal circumstances the 5 states would give the GOP a 6-4 edge in U.S. Senate seats (the Dems have had a 2-0 edge since 1992) and a 33-29 edge in electoral votes (the Dems got all 55 EVs from CA in 2008 and 2004 and all 54 EVs from CA in 2000, 1996 and 1992).

We should also split Texas up into four GOP states, which would give us 6 new GOP Senators (and increase GOP electoral votes by 6 as well).


59 posted on 02/27/2009 10:40:22 AM PST by AuH2ORepublican (Fred Thompson appears human-sized because he is actually standing a million miles away.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: 70times7
In the past when we were being taxed unfaily there were those who didn't want a split. They advocated working w/ the governing powers to come to a peaceful conclusion. They were called Tories

I recall reading somewhere that at the time of the American Revolution, something like 50% of the population remained loyal to the British crown. Of the 50% who supported the revolution, only a minority actually engaged in the actual warfare and liberation of the country.

The American population appears to be similarly split today. Apparently the descendants of the Minutemen and the Founders are at places like FR. We're the ones who are going to man the battle lines when the second revolution starts.

And the loyalists of today will benefit from our sacrifice (whether they "get it" or not), just as they did 232 years ago.

60 posted on 02/27/2009 11:30:58 AM PST by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-92 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson