Skip to comments.
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE - Hollister v Soetoro (re Berg)
scribd ^
| 2/25/2009
| rxsid
Posted on 02/25/2009 4:55:05 PM PST by rxsid
New Court Order in Hollister v. Soetoro
Filed & Entered: 02/25/2009 Docket Text Order to Show Cause
http://www.scribd.com/doc/12825890/Order-to-Show-Cause
That doesn't look good on Berg (the case).
TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: birthcertificate; certifigate; colb; hollister; lawsuit; obama; soetoro
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 201-210 next last
To: esquirette
"The law is a tough business, and the courts do not accept nonsense. It is a take-no-prisoners game and the attorneys who venture into Federal court had better be willing and able to play by the rules. They are paramount, and they are all written down for everyone to see.
Too bad that the quality of legal practice leaves much to be desired here, but that is the real problem. Dont blame it on the courts. "
Do the courts need to follow the laws and rules? Or are they exempt somehow?
So far as I can tell in this particular case, it looks like the clerk for the court required something of the plaintiff that wasn't required.
So the paralegal files documentary evidence of what transpired.
Then, the judge takes it out on the plaintiff's paralegal?
This appears to me that the judge on this case is basically saying he and his court are above the rules.
61
posted on
02/25/2009 6:41:56 PM PST
by
rxsid
To: azishot
Would you please explain how the judge could say that Berg cant practice in his court but then tell him he has until the 26th to show cause?
An attorney named Hemingway, who is admitted to practice in DC, also signs all papers. As for Mr. Berg, he filed a motion to be admitted in the DC court for this case. According to
Right Side of Life, a couple weeks ago the Judge held that motion in abeyance "until the Court has had the opportunity, in open court, to examine their credentials, their competence, their good faith, and the factual and legal bases of the complaint they have signed."
To: Sibre Fan
63
posted on
02/25/2009 6:43:50 PM PST
by
azishot
(I just joined the NRA.)
To: freekitty
Reading the order again, it looks like the paralegal signed. . . ? That is even worse. . . .
64
posted on
02/25/2009 6:46:14 PM PST
by
esquirette
(If we do not know our own worldview, we will accept theirs.)
To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
"Hollister is the lead atty"
Hollister is the lead plaintiff. I believe he's retired military (officer) subject to lifetime re-instatement.
65
posted on
02/25/2009 6:46:22 PM PST
by
rxsid
To: Sibre Fan
Thanks for the clarification.
66
posted on
02/25/2009 6:46:33 PM PST
by
luv2ndamend
(May your chains set lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen. — Samue)
To: rxsid
I should say, for the rest of his life he’s subject to re-instatement.
67
posted on
02/25/2009 6:47:03 PM PST
by
rxsid
To: Frantzie
Can Berg then take this case to SCOTUS if it is dismissed?
______________
what SCOTUS? That sham group sitting in there not even pretending to give a sh*t about the Constitution?
68
posted on
02/25/2009 6:48:51 PM PST
by
mojitojoe
(None are more hopelessly enslaved, as those who falsely believe they are free.)
To: esquirette
That’s very interesting. Thanks for the info. I have worked legal but am not an attorney or paralegal.
69
posted on
02/25/2009 6:49:07 PM PST
by
freekitty
(Give me back my conservative vote.)
To: esquirette
I completely overlooked that. Yes, that is not good.
70
posted on
02/25/2009 6:50:47 PM PST
by
freekitty
(Give me back my conservative vote.)
To: MHGinTN
Sorry I bothered to post. The pleading that was required was a memorandum of points and authorities in opposition to the motion to dismiss by the Defendants. The judge in this matter interpreted the pleading that was filed as being filed by a paralegal. The judge then gave the Plaintiff’s until tomorrow at 5 pm to file the the correct responsive pleading or show cause why the case should not be dismissed.
To: Sibre Fan
72
posted on
02/25/2009 6:54:26 PM PST
by
freekitty
(Give me back my conservative vote.)
To: rxsid
that’s what I get for trying to read this on the phone... I just now got on the computer.
The following “LEAD ATTORNEY
ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED” was under hollisters name, my apologies
73
posted on
02/25/2009 6:54:52 PM PST
by
Freedom2specul8
(Please pray for our troops.... http://www.americasupportsyou.mil/)
To: montanajoe
You are right. One of the other posters said she signed it and I overlooked that.
74
posted on
02/25/2009 6:55:55 PM PST
by
freekitty
(Give me back my conservative vote.)
To: montanajoe
Don’t be sorry. Everyone’s post is really a contribution and we can all learn.
75
posted on
02/25/2009 6:57:22 PM PST
by
freekitty
(Give me back my conservative vote.)
To: azishot; freekitty
post #28 is really bad wrt:to the comments about the blank pages/joke comments. at the same time, I don’t see why the paralegal can’t assist the lead atty. unless laws about paralegals are different in washington.
76
posted on
02/25/2009 7:00:24 PM PST
by
Freedom2specul8
(Please pray for our troops.... http://www.americasupportsyou.mil/)
To: montanajoe
It is all very confusing, isn’t it! And I think that was the intent of this judge and his servants. But, who can tell, he fabricated an ingenious plausible deniability.
77
posted on
02/25/2009 7:00:37 PM PST
by
MHGinTN
(Believing they cannot be deceived, they cannot be convinced when they are deceived.)
To: montanajoe
Thanks for the clarification.
I actually understood that.
78
posted on
02/25/2009 7:00:46 PM PST
by
2111USMC
To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
I thought that was a little overboard too; but is signed by the judge and he has the the last say.
Any other responses? I am rather enjoying this and learning a lot.
79
posted on
02/25/2009 7:04:23 PM PST
by
freekitty
(Give me back my conservative vote.)
To: LucyT
80
posted on
02/25/2009 7:05:09 PM PST
by
Polarik
("A forgery created to prove a claim repudiates that claim")
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 201-210 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson