ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE - Hollister v Soetoro (re Berg)

scribd ^ | 2/25/2009 | rxsid

[rxsid]

New Court Order in Hollister v. Soetoro

Filed & Entered: 02/25/2009 Docket Text Order to Show Cause

http://www.scribd.com/doc/12825890/Order-to-Show-Cause

That doesn't look good on Berg (the case).

[FreeManN]

As part of the privilege of having a law license, you are held to a higher standard.

I have already posted how Orly could have protected her client, Lt. Easterling and I do not care to rehash it all.

Go here for a detailed discussion of the matter:

http://naturalborncitizen.wordpress.com/

[Calpernia]

Psst, it is now 88 MIL Plaintiffs :)

[seekthetruth]

Thanks for the information. I am old but still learning!:)

[Sibre Fan]

What, exactly, does this mean for the case?
"UPDATE: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE DISCHARGED"

I think it means that the order to show cause (the main subject of this thread) is "discharged" - which means that it is no longer applicable. I think it's the same thing as saying "withdrawn." Now that the Judge has figured out that the problem was a technical problem, he's referred Berg to the instructions for proper filing (I guess for future papers), but accepted the papers filed on February 13. In other words, Berg is no longer required to "show cause" why the case should not be dismissed.

So, to get this in context, as I understand it:
1. Obama filed a motion to dismiss Berg's complaint.
2. Berg filed an amended complaint.
3. The judge said that was nonresponsive and that Berg had to file an opposition or concede the motion to dismiss.
4. Berg filed an opposition, but the judge couldn't read it because it was uploaded in too-high resolution.
5. The judge, thinking that the opposition wasn't filed, issued the order to show cause.
6. Berg responded to that order today.
7. The judge figured out that it was a technical problem, so he withdrew his order to show cause, and told Berg to read the uploading instructions to make sure the court's computer could read his files.

Now, Obama may file a reply brief.
Then, the judge will either grant or deny Obama's motion to dismiss.

[null and void]

See #140.

Wanna bet that the "Civilian Security Force" will be required to swear an oath of PERSONAL allegiance to The Leader?

[rxsid]

got it. that does make sense now. thank you!

[azishot]

Appreciate your explanation.

[azishot]

I swear, null and void, that the civilian security force has me more scared than anything.

And you’re right...they would pledge not only their allegiance but their lives to him.

[null and void]

Me too. And as far as things to be sacred of goes, that's a very target rich environment.

[null and void]

I can see it being made up of mostly Hell’s Angels, Black Panthers, and muslim Brotherhoodlums.

[little jeremiah]

Thank you. I always need someone to interpret legalese.

[little jeremiah]

Black Panthers, ACORN and associated thugs.

[null and void]

keep reading...

[Kansas58]

I want the Constitution to be followed, of course.
However, we will have major riots in the streets if Obama is forced out over this.
It has to be done, but -— be ready if this works!

(I am thinking that, more than likely, this severely weakens Obama. This will make many of his supporters feel used. This will hurt him in the Congressional races and in his re-election chances. But, maybe it won't, by itself, get him kicked out before his first term expires!)

[little jeremiah]

You said it better - Muslim Brotherhoodlums is classic.

(That reminds me - we do not have enough ammo in this house.)

[1COUNTER-MORTER-68]

Wanna bet that the “Civilian Security Force” will be required to swear an oath of PERSONAL allegiance to The Leader?
~~~

Nope...

[FreeManN]

Dr. Keyes got it right in this video:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zmujttc0oJc

You ask about the end game. I don’t want to go there yet.

Let it suffice to say bo’s thugs are no match for the Military Men (black, white & hispanic) who will forceably remove him from office upon an Order from SCOTUS.

I was in LA on the day of the Rodney King Riots. Riots don’t bother me.

Frankly, I doubt that the “riots” will be that substantial.

By the time, SCOTUS orders bo removed, people (including most of the blacks who voted for him) will be as sick of bo as Dr. Keyes is already.

Watch the video and also look up videos on bill ayers and see how inept these clowns are at producing civil unrest.

[Freedom2specul8]

Thank you very much for the ping...interesting turn of events.

[Freedom2specul8]

Well, doubtful on hell’s angels...esp with their hate hate relationship with the feds. ;)

[Freedom2specul8]

Oh the IRONY—

---

Exerpt:

Proof of citizenship stymies man in hopes of getting a federal job
Posted: 02/25/2009

Abe Goteiner believes he?s voted in every U.S. election since 1966.He has an honorable discharge from the U.S. Navy, and in the 1970s, he had top-secret clearance at a U.S. underground nuclear test site.

He has a Social Security number and a long work history.

But now Uncle Sam wants him to pay for a certificate proving he?s a U.S. citizen.

After applying for a job in September 2008 with a contractor for the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Goteiner said, he launched into a ?fight with the federal bureaucracy.?

The Overland Park resident was told he needed Form N-600, the ?Designated Certificate of Citizenship,? to pursue federal employment.And it would cost him $460.

http://kc.vrvm.com/kcstar/db_1156/contentdetail.htm;jsessionid=A30AED9C8B1155F40121FA22B7238186?contentguid=hyu9sSrs&storycount=103&detailindex=1