Can Evolution Keep You Safe?

CEH ^ | February 25, 2009

[GodGunsGuts]

Here’s another hopeless attempt for Darwinists to look useful. This one is no better than Darwinian medicine (see 04/25/2007, bullet 3, 06/25/2003 and and 01/13/2003). If you needed Darwinian medicine like a hole in the head, you need Darwinian security like a bull’s-eye painted on your shirt...

[GodGunsGuts]

ping!

[steve-b]

Man: You sit here, dear.
Wife: All right.
Man: Morning!
Waitress: Morning!
Man: Well, what've you got?
Waitress: Well, there's egg and bacon; egg sausage and bacon; egg and spam; egg bacon and spam; egg bacon sausage and spam; spam bacon sausage and spam; spam egg spam spam bacon and spam; spam sausage spam spam bacon spam tomato and spam;
Vikings: Spam spam spam spam...
Waitress: ...spam spam spam egg and spam; spam spam spam spam spam spam baked beans spam spam spam...
Vikings: Spam! Lovely spam! Lovely spam!
Waitress: ...or Lobster Thermidor a Crevette with a mornay sauce served in a Provencale manner with shallots and aubergines garnished with truffle pate, brandy and with a fried egg on top and spam.
Wife: Have you got anything without spam?
Waitress: Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
Wife: I don't want ANY spam!
Man: Why can't she have egg bacon spam and sausage?
Wife: THAT'S got spam in it!
Man: Hasn't got as much spam in it as spam egg sausage and spam, has it?
Vikings: Spam spam spam spam... (Crescendo through next few lines...)
Wife: Could you do the egg bacon spam and sausage without the spam then?
Waitress: Urgghh!
Wife: What do you mean 'Urgghh'? I don't like spam!
Vikings: Lovely spam! Wonderful spam!
Waitress: Shut up!
Vikings: Lovely spam! Wonderful spam!
Waitress: Shut up! (Vikings stop) Bloody Vikings! You can't have egg bacon spam and sausage without the spam.
Wife: I don't like spam!
Man: Sshh, dear, don't cause a fuss. I'll have your spam. I love it. I'm having spam spam spam spam spam spam spam beaked beans spam spam spam and spam!
Vikings: Spam spam spam spam. Lovely spam! Wonderful spam!
Waitress: Shut up!! Baked beans are off.
Man: Well could I have her spam instead of the baked beans then?
Waitress: You mean spam spam spam spam spam spam... (but it is too late and the Vikings drown her words)
Vikings: (Singing elaborately...) Spam spam spam spam. Lovely spam! Wonderful spam! Spam spa-a-a-a-a-am spam spa-a-a-a-a-am spam. Lovely spam! Lovely spam! Lovely spam! Lovely spam! Lovely spam! Spam spam spam spam!

[LiteKeeper]

read later

[cripplecreek]

Nothin but.

[Alamo-Girl]

Thanks for the ping!

[Jeff Gordon]

Imagine walking down the street. There is guy standing on the corner acting somewhat irrational. He is saying things that do not make sense. His thoughts are random, jumbled and spoken with poor grammar. He is shouting our random words and phrases. How would you react? What would you do?

This describes the visual impact of the linked to web page. One does not even have to read the page to know that the author is a total nut job.

[count-your-change]

This has to be the best conjecture founded upon error with support from fantasy statement I've seen in a while, a long while:

“How do you manage risk? How do you decide to allocate energy to defense versus other things? These are fundamental trade-offs that all organisms face,” he said.“One possible reason for extinction is that individuals are making incorrect decisions about how to manage the risks they face”....

The dinosaurs just lacked good judgment about risk management and resource allocation! yeeeeHaawwwww

[count-your-change]

An excellent statement of Darwinism’s logic and reason, and yours too! All the creationist’s must feel crushed by it.

[FreedomProtector]

thanks for posting...

[BlueDragon]

...speaking of what seems to be [total?] nut jobs...

A Jovian Taxonomy
Sagan and Salpeter envisioned three main types of Jovian creatures. There were sinkers, small organisms which were constantly falling towards the deadly deep, dense, and hot layers of the planet but always managed to survive long enough to produce offspring that would stay up in the more habitable air layers to repeat their cycle of life. The other aerial residents of Jupiter were known as floaters, which Sagan would later describe as being “kilometers across, enormously larger than the greatest whale that ever was, beings the size of cities.” Floaters were seen as drifting across the vast alien sky in great herds, looking like a collection of immense balloons, which in essence there were, using the lighter elements of Jupiter’s atmosphere to stay aloft.

Nutty? you decide...

above info from one of today's earlier threads http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2193819/posts

Above the "Jovian Taxonomy" header was;

"To determine just how scientifically plausible such aliens might be, Sagan asked his colleague Salpeter to help him produce a paper on the subject which was titled “Particles, Environments, and Possible Ecologies in the Jovian Atmosphere.” The paper first appeared in the prestigious The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series in late 1975."

Oh, those wacky astrophysicists. Such imaginations. The products of which were reportedly published in a "prestigious" science journal!

Was it "peer reviewed"???

If we are going to be hand-wavingly dismissive, well then, let's do it right. Or maybe you could try reading the linked article and discussing it on it merits, or lack?

Just saying...

[<1/1,000,000th%]

Hard to argue with these criticisms of Mr. Sagarin.

He sounds like a goof.

[Jeff Gordon]

What is wrong with scientists speculating on possibilities? They were not proposing theories and tests. They were just speculating.

If you want really strange, consider the guys that are not just speculating that the earth is only 6,000 years old, they insist that it God's absolute truth. Dude, I am telling you, it does not get any stranger than that.

[Torquay]

You seem to have an unreasonable and obsessive fear and hatred of God. I base this conclusion upon other posts and comments you have made on similar threads, including this one.

It is my scientific supposition that you have some deep-seated issues that you are desperately seeking a way to deal with. I wish you the best of luck in your search.

[tpanther]

Exposing spam isn’t spam.

Can you offer anything other than endless pojections?

[tpanther]

What is wrong with scientists speculating on possibilities?

---

Apparently nothing as long as they’re not also, bible-thumping, young earth goat herders...as long as there’s no hint of Judeo-Christianity ... it’s all good, ad infinatum!

String theory, multiverse theory, heck even studying the effects of prayer...just as long as the creation scientists are stomped out and held to ridiculous pseudo-peer review, measurable, testable.... rules no one else has to meet in the least little bit, it’s ALL good.

THAT’S science.

[tpanther]

You seem to have an unreasonable and obsessive fear and hatred of God. I base this conclusion upon other posts and comments you have made on similar threads, including this one.

It is my scientific supposition that you have some deep-seated issues that you are desperately seeking a way to deal with. I wish you the best of luck in your search.

---

To expound, I think when it’s all boiled down, this is the essence of the discription of liberalism.

[Jeff Gordon]

You seem to have an unreasonable and obsessive fear and hatred of God.

Well then, let me correct your assumption.

I have no fear nor hatred of the entity which I call God. However, make no mistake about it, my God is not the god of the Bible. My God is not the god who would kill all the first born of a nation. My God is not the god that sits in judgment of how well men worship him and follow rules that other men have attributed to god. That god of the bible is a cruel, irrational being. That god does not exist. He is just a figment of the imagination of humans desperately seeking answers to the wrong questions in the wrong places.

Just remember, the god of the bible is only the god of those of believe in the bible. That god is by no means uniform nor universal. His antics have no meaning to the rest of us. (I do, however, fear the antics of his believers.)

[Jeff Gordon]

THAT’S science.

Nod and smiles.

[Torquay]

As you can see Jeff, science is a creation of God. Thank You for supporting my scientific measurement of your soul!