Don’t know much about Jindal at this point, but my objection to Romney had nothing whatsoever to do with his religion. He was (is) a slimy two-faced politician who would do or say anything to get elected. He ran and governed as an abortionist socialist liberal. His convenient conversion to pro-life conservatism just in time to try to capture the Republican nomination for president is laughable. He’s a fraud. JMHO, of course.
Hear, Hear!!!
Wasn't questioning your objection to Romney. I respect them. But many did object to him on the basis of religion and, superficially, his home state.
Indeed, speaking for myself, I won't be supporting Romney for the nomination in 2012. If you can't beat as unsatisfactory a candidate as John McCain, what's the point...???
Instead, my immediate concern is what I'd judge as a wave of markedly irrelevant or shallow, small-minded criticism of the next generation of candidates -- Palin and Jindal, in particular.
I'm questioning the criticism's source. And their motivations. Either many FReepers have begun ignoring substance and are making judgments on the basis of what the MSM tells them...or we are infested with agents provocateur.
“Don’t know much about Jindal at this point, but my objection to Romney had nothing whatsoever to do with his religion. He was (is) a slimy two-faced politician who would do or say anything to get elected. He ran and governed as an abortionist socialist liberal. His convenient conversion to pro-life conservatism just in time to try to capture the Republican nomination for president is laughable. He’s a fraud. JMHO, of course.”
I second that!
Jindal and Palin are far and away more conservative than Romney is. Romney got picked apart because he deserved it.
Yup.
I hope Romney doesn’t try to make a comeback. He’s a phony!
MHO matches your’s Jim...