Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 02/24/2009 7:14:01 PM PST by Jean S
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-63 next last
To: Jean S

A bad national debut for Jindal. He could do much better. While campaigning for Governor, Jindal was sharp minded and had a command of the issues.

Our stars, Jindal, Palin, and Sanford, need more training on the national scene.

Next time perhaps we should let Romney response to the Messiah. I don’t really like Romney, but if the Messiah continues to be strong in the polls let Romney blow his personal wealth trying to take him down and save - Jindal, Palin, or Sanford - for 2016.


290 posted on 02/24/2009 7:51:38 PM PST by yongin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jean S

That. Was. Terrible. Rush jinxed him with the whole “next Reagan” thing.


292 posted on 02/24/2009 7:51:42 PM PST by exist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jean S

Poll needs help... 12,161 votes

http://www.cnn.com/

How do you rate President Obama’s address to Congress?

Thumbs up 73%

Thumbs Down 10%

Didn’t watch 17%


312 posted on 02/24/2009 7:55:09 PM PST by eaglestar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All

I like Jindal but that was pretty bad.

Rick Santelli should have given the rebuttal.


320 posted on 02/24/2009 7:56:25 PM PST by SMCC1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jean S

I noticed MSNBC ripped off Frank Luntz’s dial-a-meter focus group reactions.


322 posted on 02/24/2009 7:56:28 PM PST by St. Louis Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

I think it’s important to see him as people who don’t know much about him would see him. I think he started out a little slow. There were some clever shots in there, but is he speaking to an audience that will ‘get’ those?

I like mostly what he had to say and he finished much stronger. Changing the ‘yes, we can’ to ‘Americans can do anything’. But he needs work on his delivery.


339 posted on 02/24/2009 7:59:05 PM PST by ReneeLynn (Socialism, it's the new black.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jean S

Forgive my ignorance, but isn’t this speech usually called the State of the Union!


340 posted on 02/24/2009 7:59:24 PM PST by sociallyunacceptable (Charlie's tax problem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jean S

Lessee how Cantor does in comparison to Jindal.


354 posted on 02/24/2009 8:01:13 PM PST by Plutarch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jean S

I was really hoping for something big from Jindal, but his delivery was terrible. He spoke too fast and gave a weird smile at the end. He can recover in time, but it will take some work to un-do that first impression he left with many Americans who had never seen him before.


356 posted on 02/24/2009 8:01:20 PM PST by Lou Budvis ( 'Benjamin Franklin and Jefferson are rolling in their graves.')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jean S
Jindal sucked apparently. I listened to the content, so I didn't notice how flat he apparently sounded. I thought the content was pretty good for a generic response to a really generic Presidential speech...no specifics.

President Obama gave little in substance but spoke in broad generalities adorned with the usual bromides.

Kind of hard to respond to that sort of non-substance. Where Jindal did his best was in laying out the differences in the general philosophies of the two parties.

I doubt anyone could have done better. The response speech is one of the least attractive and riskiest speeches to give. Pretty much all downside with very little upside.

To be sure, Jindal didn't up his political capital with this performance.
360 posted on 02/24/2009 8:01:47 PM PST by Sudetenland (Victory in 2012...but first Victory in 2010!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jean S

McConnell’s Response [Kathryn Jean Lopez]

“Tonight Kentuckians and all Americans were proud eyewitnesses to history as an African-American president addressed a joint session of Congress for the first time.

“Over the years, there have been many important markers in our nation’s long journey toward racial equality. Few have been as compelling as seeing President Obama in the Speaker’s rostrum tonight.

“The President’s message was important and timely: America faces great challenges in the months and years ahead, and I was heartened to hear of his commitment to the millions who are struggling to hold onto homes and jobs and who are worried about what the future holds for themselves and their children.

“As we work to address all these concerns, we will have our differences. Republicans believe the road back to prosperity is paved with greater personal freedom, not bigger government, and that in this moment of economic hardship, we should be more vigilant about spending taxpayer dollars, not less.

“But one thing is clear: working through the current troubles will require a shared commitment as we address America’s challenges ahead.”


431 posted on 02/24/2009 8:11:43 PM PST by roses of sharon (Pray Hussein fails!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jean S

Is there a place to see this speech?


454 posted on 02/24/2009 8:14:38 PM PST by eclecticEel (Wall Street isn't a charity ... so why are we giving them money?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jean S

I did not watch any of this stuff on TV. But here is the pulse from a non-political forum. Listening to Obama made them sick to their stomach. As far as Jindal was concerned then they compared him to Mr Rogers. And they thought that the GOP blew a really good opportunity. It is far time that conservatives don’t support someone simply because they are GOP. If they do then they will lose more and more power in their government. Most importantly the republicans need to start standing for something.

http://www.tickerforum.org/cgi-ticker/akcs-www?post=84690


490 posted on 02/24/2009 8:19:39 PM PST by Revel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fieldmarshaldj; Clintonfatigued; Impy

Oh good grief. Now we’ve got Romney and Giuliani supporters emerging from the woodwork and onto this thread.


576 posted on 02/24/2009 8:36:47 PM PST by rabscuttle385 ("If this be treason, then make the most of it!" —Patrick Henry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jean S

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2009/02/msnbc_oh_god.html

MSNBCer Says “Oh God” Before Jindal Reponse


648 posted on 02/24/2009 8:56:06 PM PST by roses of sharon (Pray Hussein fails!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jean S

Jindal doesn’t want volcanoes to be monitored? Is he trying to take Palin out early?


674 posted on 02/24/2009 9:03:19 PM PST by Peren (The real Messiah knew how to put a cabinet together)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jean S

Bobby, I remember that press conference you gave when there was a hurricane approaching around the time of the GOP convention, I think it was. Serious business was immediately at hand and I was mightily impressed by your presence and your command of the details when it really counted. Tonight was all about “showbiz”, so be sure to nurture that showbiz gene! Or not. Talk about being under a microscope, oy. Public life looks like a big pain in the arse.


703 posted on 02/24/2009 9:27:35 PM PST by Floratina
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jean S

I can’t understand the criticism of Jindal not coming out like gangbusters against zero in this particular speech. His goal was only to raise questions in the mind of the public about the wisdom of the big government direction that the dems in congress are taking us.

His aims were at least threefold:

1. Set the stage for making gains in the 2010 congressional elections, not trying to take down zero in one fell swoop tonight.

2. Be inspiring and non-threatening to particular voter blocks, i.e., women and seniors.

3. Not say anything stupid or incendiary that would focus attention on himself, and end up having the press latch on to and run with.

I think he actually was quite sneakily effective with the subtle gauntlet he laid down.


712 posted on 02/24/2009 9:39:13 PM PST by mtrott
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All
I think I've about had it with with all of you self righteous, know it all "compuratives" who seem to be looking for every reason to trash Bobby Jindal, Sarah Palin, and any other up and coming Republican because they're not perfect. I like both of them and I think either one of them would make a far better POTUS than the POS that currently occupies the White House.

Now I admit Jindal speech was kind of flat, but it had far more substance and coherence than anything Obama could put out, and Jindal delivered his speech without a teleprompter. Try that Obama! I will also admit Sarah Palin's interview with Katie was less than stellar, that's if you only watched the chopped up version the media showed. If you listened to, or watched the WHOLE interview Sarah did great. For all those FReepers who are ready give up on Pain and Jindal and think they're not ready for prime time because of one interview or speech, just remember Ronald Reagan's first debate with Walter Mondale. Reagan bombed it big time. But he also came back and wiped the floor with Mondale in the second debate. Aren't we glad we didn't give up on Reagan because he under performed in one debate?

Understand I'm not trying to demean or attack anyone here but I'm just so tired of the conservative base having these stupid hissy fits, and carrying on with this constant whining and pouting because some elections don't go our way or we find out a candidate or leader we thought was our "perfect saviour", like Palin and Jindal, turn out to be imperfect and HUMAN as even the great Ronald Reagan was.

It's time for us conservatives to start ACTING like Reagan instead of just talking about him. I understand things are bad under Obama, but things were bad under Carter and I don't ever remember hearing Reagan whine and complain about how bad things were and that things were hopeless. If I remember right Reagan said America's best days were ahead of her. And he said this at the time when most people thought our economy, culture, and military were on a permanent decline never to come back. Reagan always had an unquenchable optimism in America and it's greatness regardless of the difficulties and challenges he faced.

While Palin and Jindal may not be carbon copies of Reagan, they have his conservative values and have the same love for this country that he had, which is more than good enough for me. So I say this to my fellow conservatives. Stop the with the pouting and the pessimism and start expressing some of the real hope and optimism of great leaders like Ronald Reagan, Sarah Palin, and Bobby Jindal. Our party and our country will be much better because of it.

733 posted on 02/24/2009 10:26:39 PM PST by Victory Rocks (Our brave troops are the real peacemakers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jean S; All

Wow! How long has it been since we heard that kind of a delivery out of a Republican? Amazing! Very craftily presented.

Kudos to Jindal.


756 posted on 02/25/2009 12:13:43 AM PST by DoughtyOne (Resolved: Gregg, McCain, Snowe, Spectre: 2010, Collins, Graham: 2014)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-63 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson