Credit craze trapped more liberal Britain, too

San Francisco Chronicle ^ | 2/22/9 | Debra J. Saunders

[SmithL]

London -- Think that credit collapse that triggered the Bush administration's $700 billion bank bailout was necessary because of Republican hostility to regulation and the ineptness of President George W. Bush?

If it were that simple, then British Prime Minister Gordon Brown and his Labor Party would not be squirming, and the United Kingdom would not be swimming in staggering sums of debt.

It was not that long ago that market watchers hailed Brown as the savvy Euro-technocrat who, as the United Kingdom's former chancellor of the exchequer, understood capital markets and calmly navigated British finance through the storms that swamped Bushdom last year. When the Halifax Bank of Scotland was on the verge of collapse in September, Brown began working on a takeover of the bank by Lloyd's TSB - for which the prime minister was hailed as a hero who averted a crisis.

But the deal did not save the empire. Instead, it helped sink Lloyds, requiring government intervention. British taxpayers now own a 43 percent stake in Lloyds - which may grow. Some wonder if Brown will have to nationalize Lloyds.

Oh, yes, and last week, the Sunday Telegraph reported that Lloyds was planning to pay 120 million pounds (US $171.72 million) in bonuses to top execs.

Sound familiar?

This part is, too: There were Cassandras in both countries warning of impending disaster.

[rabscuttle385]

*Ping!*

[chuck_the_tv_out]

“Think that credit collapse that triggered the Bush administration’s $700 billion bank bailout was necessary because of Republican hostility to regulation and the ineptness of President George W. Bush?”

Then yes, you are leftarded.

[grey_whiskers]

When are government officials going to get multi-million dollar severance packages?

Oh, that's right, they already *do*. They're called "retirement" and "consulting" and "speaking fees".

Cheers!

[RedMonqey]

...bank bailout was necessary because of Republican hostility to regulation and the ineptness of President George W. Bush?

It amazes me that those who blame Bush's policies of lax regulations and say we should have long ago adopted an European type socialism cannot explain how Bush's de-regulation have sunk the Titanic social structure of the mighty European Socialism.

They have no answer. As usual...