Posted on 02/19/2009 8:40:52 PM PST by Sir Gawain
Thursday, February 19, 2009 NRO Talks to CNBC's Rick Santelli [Stephen Spruiell] Earlier today, Kathryn posted a link to the video of CNBC's Rick Santelli giving voice to what he described as a groundswell of discontent over the president's new mortgage plan. I caught up with Santelli just moments ago and talked to him about what he says has been "kind of a crazy day."
National Review Online: Were you expecting anything like this reaction? Rick Santelli: Not at all, not at all. It was just, after 48 hours of listening to hundreds of people trying to approach me on floors, on trains, everywhere, the opinions were almost unanimous, and I just tried to pick up that thread. The pits weren’t open at the time and the traders that were on the floor getting ready for the opening all started to gravitate to where I was talking, and it just took on a life of its own. NRO: When we posted a link to the video, we were swamped with e-mails in support, including a couple from traders at the Board of Trade in Chicago, who have been saying right on. How have the e-mails that you’ve been getting, how have they been running? Santelli: I’ll be honest with you, I think I’ve gotten somewhere between 850-900, and I think I had three that were negative.
NRO: What are that small group of critics saying? Where do they think you went wrong? Santelli: They thought I was uncharitable, got up on the wrong side of the bed, had no compassion for people who are going through rough times, and that isn’t at all the issue. The issue is, you can’t pick out 8 or 9 percent and give them things that weaken the 90 or 92 percent who are carrying the water. You need to come up with legislation that may help the people that need it but not hurt the people that… listen, my 401k’s a 201k, my kid’s college tuition is going up 10 percent. This is tough for everybody. Maybe a tax break, maybe everybody who has a house gets something. They need to quit picking winners and losers, and they have to quit alienating the classes. You have to figure out a way to float all boats, and I think that’s where the administration has gone wrong, and I think that’s the nerve I hit.
NRO: You were also skeptical of the original bailout plan, specifically the way that it seemed to be a “Let’s rush through this and figure out the details later” kind of approach. Do you think your predictions on that have been borne out by events?
Santelli: I remember this all started roughly in the summer of ’07, and at that point, that Halloween that followed in ’07, I think I said something like, Frankenstein derivatives aren’t going to be resuscitated. These bad positions are going to hang around until they’re taken out. As an ex-trader—I traded for 20 years—bad positions don’t go away. There’s not enough money for many of these banks to sell them, because of what it does to their balance sheets. At the end of the day, whether it’s housing or whether it’s toxic derivatives, I just don’t think you can spend your way into correcting something that’s going to be painful and make it not painful. So I think I’ve been kind of spot-on in many ways as to the spending plans. At the end of the day, it’s simple. A lot of the president’s advisers are saying that there’s a multiplier effect to the government money, and it’s over one. Now if that’s true, then the government should spend non-stop for the rest of our lives, because we’ll get a positive return. And it makes no sense.
NRO: Right. And now it seems we passed this bailout bill without specifying any of the details, it’s kind of become a blank check, and they say that Barack Obama can do something like 80 percent of his homeowner-assistance plan without even asking Congress. So how do you think that plays out in the future? Santelli: I guess in the end, I believe in the founding fathers, and I believe that in America... the pursuit of happiness and to work hard and keep the fruits of your labor is something I believe in. And I’m not saying we should forget people who need help. But at the end of the day, Americans are strong and they’re charitable. I think what they have a problem with is that it’s force-fed via the government. |
bump
Santelli for President...Hot Damn..Areal man.
He is hardly going to get fired when he triples or quadruples CNBC audience. And he never says anything critical of GE.
4 times nuttin’ is still nuttin!!
/Sarc
I’ve seen people get fired for MUCH LESS.. even when Keeping them would have been in the Company’s Better Interest. I’m member of some of the same Unions Santelli would belong to, and .. Some of the STORIES!!
Many of us would be interested to hear the stories, even without company or individual names!
If nothing else, he has boosted CNBC’s ratings.
Sounds good to me, VRWC For Truth!
Ah, we gotta quit being afraid to speak our minds. That’s just want the liberals want.
I’m glad Rick is telling it like it is.
....that’s just what the liberals want.
(correction to above post, sorry)
I loved his speech, and I support his sentiment, and his tea party. I am a little put off by this:
“Maybe a tax break, maybe everybody who has a house gets something. “
I have read that in a few places today, and I don’t like it. What about the people who have been saving for a house, and yet because this fraud kept driving prices up then they could never buy one unless they took out a loan that would have been irresponsible. Now government help to home owners has the effect of keep house prices up. And even if it did not then why would it be fair for someone with a house to get money from the government and the other guy who pays his taxes too- does not get anything. That is just wrong.
The only fair answer is for the government to stop spending money. This is America. Let things fall where they may. And if they don’t stop the spending then everything is going to come crashing down.
Why the HELL should this come from a guy on TV?/ Where’s our LEADERS???? HELLO, GOP!!!!!!
This comment was left on the CNBC website:
“To get back to the Tea Party, my calendar says April !9 is the anniversary of the beginning of the American Revolution. We as a people need to get the attention of those in Washington and a grand nation-wide tea party ought to get their attention. I propose that the word should be spread for an organized tea party on April 19th. Peaceful protests need to be encouraged and a march on Washington set up. Call all the radio stations, tv stations, fax, email, write letters to the media, congress to protest the march toward socialism. My personal belief is we should call for an impeachment of Obama, Biden, Pelosi, Reid, Frank, Dodd, Schumer, and all the other Democrats who voted for the garbage bill they want to cram down our throats. Get Limbaugh, Hannity, and all the Conservative Pundits on board to encourage a cleanup of Washington. And get rid of the Lobbyists as well, theyre lining their pockets with our money while America is getting the shaft.”
Well? What do you think? If that sounds good to you, copy & paste, post it everywhere you go.
April 19th - far enough off to plan for, near enough to maintain the rage against the machine. The symbolic significance is the best part.
Slightly off topic question..but does anyone know if mortgage adjustments ( partial forgiveness) restructuring..whatever you want to call it..under Zero’s proposals..will be taxable income to the recipient?
Im wondering if hes going to have a JOB come tomorrow Morning.
Might be an opening for IL senator...replace Burris with Santelli.
Im wondering if hes going to have a JOB come tomorrow Morning.
Might be an opening for IL senator...replace Burris with Santelli.
bump for later
I would like to mention that a LIBERAL friend of mine called me over to another part of the office to watch the video. I had not mentioned the video to her, though I had seen the video several hours earlier, scooped so early by FR.
She totally agreed with Santelli. She is a very sincere liberal who gets uncomfortable with the hard questions. She doesn’t want people to suffer... But she’s honest about it. I generally remind her that charity must be voluntary to be worthwhile for anybody.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.