Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Capitalist Threat ( George Soros speaks)
Atlantic Monthly ^ | February 1997 | George Soros

Posted on 02/19/2009 10:01:40 AM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach

What kind of society do we want? "Let the free market decide!" is the often-heard response. That response, a prominent capitalist argues,undermines the very values on which open and democratic societies depend.

IN The Philosophy of History, Hegel discerned a disturbing historical pattern -- the crack and fall of civilizations owing to a morbid intensification of their own first principles. Although I have made a fortune in the financial markets, I now fear that the untrammeled intensification of laissez-faire capitalism and the spread of market values into all areas of life is endangering our open and democratic society. The main enemy of the open society, I believe, is no longer the communist but the capitalist threat.

The term "open society" was coined by Henri Bergson, in his book The Two Sources of Morality and Religion (1932), and given greater currency by the Austrian philosopher Karl Popper, in his book The Open Society and Its Enemies (1945). Popper showed that totalitarian ideologies like communism and Nazism have a common element: they claim to be in possession of the ultimate truth. Since the ultimate truth is beyond the reach of humankind, these ideologies have to resort to oppression in order to impose their vision on society. Popper juxtaposed with these totalitarian ideologies another view of society, which recognizes that nobody has a monopoly on the truth; different people have different views and different interests, and there is a need for institutions that allow them to live together in peace. These institutions protect the rights of citizens and ensure freedom of choice and freedom of speech. Popper called this form of social organization the "open society." Totalitarian ideologies were its enemies.

(Excerpt) Read more at mtholyoke.edu ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Editorial; Front Page News; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: bho2009; democrats; economy; neomarxism; obama; obamasmaster; obamasoros; opensociety; socialism; sorocrats; soros
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-120 next last
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

What has America come to, to be so influenced by this Hungarian self-loathing Jew? ? (Not meant as anti-Semitic, as Soros himself is). He is a foreign meddler, billionaire puppet-master


21 posted on 02/19/2009 10:14:24 AM PST by Battle of Tours
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Notice that he gives himself credit for the fall of communism.


22 posted on 02/19/2009 10:17:19 AM PST by Texas Federalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
That response, a prominent capitalist argues,undermines the very values on which open and democratic societies depend.

What kind of mental contortionist does it take to conclude that freedom of commerce -- aka Capitalism -- "undermines the very values on which open and democratic societies depend"?

Freedom to produce and buy as I wish is somehow dangerous to democracy and Soros' "open society" (wondering what THAT means...)

23 posted on 02/19/2009 10:18:09 AM PST by TChris (So many useful idiots...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TChris
From deeper in the article:

*************************EXCERPT*************************

SOCIAL DARWINISM

BY taking the conditions of supply and demand as given and declaring government intervention the ultimate evil, laissez-faire ideology has effectively banished income or wealth redistribution. I can agree that all attempts at redistribution interfere with the efficiency of the market, but it does not follow that no attempt should be made. The laissez-faire argument relies on the same tacit appeal to perfection as does communism. It claims that if redistribution causes inefficiencies and distortions, the problems can be solved by eliminating redistribution -- just as the Communists claimed that the duplication involved in competition is wasteful, and therefore we should have a centrally planned economy. But perfection is unattainable. Wealth does accumulate in the hands of its owners, and if there is no mechanism for redistribution, the inequities can become intolerable. "Money is like muck, not good except it be spread." Francis Bacon was a profound economist.

24 posted on 02/19/2009 10:20:07 AM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach (No Burkas for my Grandaughters!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

George Soros is Dr. Evil.


25 posted on 02/19/2009 10:21:07 AM PST by massgopguy (I owe everything to George Bailey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Isn’t he wanted in France for committing some crime? Why can’t we just extradite him to France???


26 posted on 02/19/2009 10:21:14 AM PST by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Barack Obama: in your guts, you know he's nuts!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
laissez-faire ideology has effectively banished income or wealth redistribution.

And he thinks that's a bad thing?

27 posted on 02/19/2009 10:22:05 AM PST by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Barack Obama: in your guts, you know he's nuts!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Army Air Corps
I need to know more about him...found this:

A HISTORIAN LOOKS AT HEGEL PHILOSOPHICALLY:

28 posted on 02/19/2009 10:23:15 AM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach (No Burkas for my Grandaughters!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: penelopesire

is that really true? how do you know?


29 posted on 02/19/2009 10:23:42 AM PST by twigs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
BY taking the conditions of supply and demand as given and declaring government intervention the ultimate evil, laissez-faire ideology has effectively banished income or wealth redistribution. I can agree that all attempts at redistribution interfere with the efficiency of the market, but it does not follow that no attempt should be made. The laissez-faire argument relies on the same tacit appeal to perfection as does communism. It claims that if redistribution causes inefficiencies and distortions, the problems can be solved by eliminating redistribution -- just as the Communists claimed that the duplication involved in competition is wasteful, and therefore we should have a centrally planned economy. But perfection is unattainable. Wealth does accumulate in the hands of its owners, and if there is no mechanism for redistribution, the inequities can become intolerable. "Money is like muck, not good except it be spread." Francis Bacon was a profound economist.

*chuckle*

It's the oldest trick in the deceiver's book. You take it upon yourself to redefine your opponent's stand, then attack it.

Notice how Soros declares that the only problem a capitalist has with wealth redistribution is that it's inefficient. So, the question between capitalism and communism is simply one of efficiency, and he can produce plenty of dirt on capitalism's inefficiencies.

What a dangerous, egotistical, hypocritical jerk.

Soros should lead by example rather than hypocrisy. He should distribute his wealth to the poor and become equal with them. If that way is truly best, why hasn't he done so already?

30 posted on 02/19/2009 10:29:08 AM PST by TChris (So many useful idiots...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: All

Article linked at #28...is heavy reading....my head hurts....and I only scanned it.


31 posted on 02/19/2009 10:29:30 AM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach (No Burkas for my Grandaughters!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: twigs

Yes..it is true. I posted it a few years ago. It was an interview Soros did with someone(can’t remember the name) and he was asked about it and said that yes he did it and then he was asked if he felt any remorse...he said..’of course not’.


32 posted on 02/19/2009 10:29:49 AM PST by penelopesire ("The only CHANGE you will get with the Democrats is the CHANGE left in your pocket")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: penelopesire

Thank you. I didn’t know that. Nor am I surprised. What did he get out of it? What was his motive?


33 posted on 02/19/2009 10:33:46 AM PST by twigs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Soros employs a misleading and selective reading of Sir Karl Popper's work:

"...totalitarian ideologies like communism and Nazism have a common element: they claim to be in possession of the ultimate truth. Since the ultimate truth is beyond the reach of humankind, these ideologies have to resort to oppression in order to impose their vision on society."

However, that is not all that Popper said about those ideologies, as their similarities extend to more fundamental concerns, namely the denial of liberty and property rights:

"...freedom is more important than equality; ...the attempt to realize equality endangers freedom; and ...if freedom is lost, there will not even be equality among the unfree.

Oops. Forgot that part, eh, George?

34 posted on 02/19/2009 10:33:53 AM PST by andy58-in-nh (Ronald Reagan had a vision of America. Barack Obama has a vision of Barack Obama.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

I used to subscribe to Atlantic but I stopped when they became relentlessly leftist. They still run PJ O’Rourke but it’s not worth it for one writer.


35 posted on 02/19/2009 10:34:45 AM PST by gorilla_warrior
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: twigs

Here you go:

http://www.americanthinker.com/2007/10/the_religious_quest_of_george.html

This article explains it and cites the interview that I was referring to.


36 posted on 02/19/2009 10:35:34 AM PST by penelopesire ("The only CHANGE you will get with the Democrats is the CHANGE left in your pocket")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: penelopesire

Soros said that “if he didn’t do it, someone else would have”. I always wondered if he was a NAZI who killed the real George Soros in a Concentration Camp and took his identity. How many other Sonderkommandos came out of those camps and showed up in England a millionaire?


37 posted on 02/19/2009 10:36:03 AM PST by massgopguy (I owe everything to George Bailey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Take a dirt nap, George


38 posted on 02/19/2009 10:38:04 AM PST by EdReform (The right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed *NRA*JPFO*SAF*GOA*SAS*CCRKBA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shankbear
230 gr. 45acp

.300 win mag. he probably wears a vest.

39 posted on 02/19/2009 10:41:45 AM PST by PsyOp (Put government in charge of tire pressure, and we'll soon have a shortage of air. - PsyOp.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: massgopguy

Good question. Kincaid did a really good article on the scumbag a few years back:

http://www.aim.org/special-report/the-hidden-soros-agenda-drugs-money-the-media-and-political-power/


40 posted on 02/19/2009 10:42:42 AM PST by penelopesire ("The only CHANGE you will get with the Democrats is the CHANGE left in your pocket")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-120 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson