Skip to comments.
You Don’t Need a Weatherman (why is John Coleman still trying to prove it’s all a scam?)
2/16/09
Posted on 02/19/2009 5:26:52 AM PST by Libloather
Link only - You Dont Need a Weatherman
TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: coleman; globalwarming; scam; weatherman
Maybe it's time for a Global Warming Channel. There would be updated pictures of the devastation as well as 'consensus' scientists attempting to prove their point. Don't forget - Algore said, "The debate is over." It's time they put their money where their mouths are. And it would be for the ULTIMATE cause - saving the planet.
To: Libloather; proud_yank; FrPR; enough_idiocy; Desdemona; rdl6989; Little Bill; IrishCatholic; ...
2
posted on
02/19/2009 5:27:34 AM PST
by
steelyourfaith
(Hope + Change = PORKULU$)
To: Libloather
Maybe it's time for a Global Warming Channel.There already is one. Watch The Weather Channel and see what I mean.
3
posted on
02/19/2009 5:35:30 AM PST
by
magslinger
(I talk to myself but sometimes I like a third opinion.)
To: Libloather
>>To get some sort of definitive explanation, I talked to Kerry Emmanuel, who is a professor of Atmospheric Science at M.I.T. He agrees with Al Gore that the debate is over .....The models are even difficult for the professionals to understand. So the problem, as Emmanuel presents it, is that scientists often expect the general public to accept conclusion as an article of faith because the explanation can be so intricate and difficult to communicate. Therein lies a problem, says Emmanuel. You have to take my word for that.<<
Here it is, plain and simple. You are too stupid to understand.
4
posted on
02/19/2009 5:36:09 AM PST
by
netmilsmom
(Psalm 109:8 - Let his days be few; and let another take his office)
To: magslinger
5
posted on
02/19/2009 5:43:40 AM PST
by
WayneS
(Respect the 2nd Amendment; Repeal the 16th)
To: steelyourfaith
To get some sort of definitive explanation, I talked to Kerry Emmanuel, who is a professor of Atmospheric Science at M.I.T. He agrees with Al Gore that the debate is over (although he does think the movie has some scientific flaws). .... he says, The models are even difficult for the professionals to understand. So the problem, as Emmanuel presents it, is that scientists often expect the general public to accept conclusion as an article of faith because the explanation can be so intricate and difficult to communicate. Therein lies a problem, says Emmanuel. You have to take my word for that.
When I was in college, a friend gave some really sound advice: when someone says "it's too complicated, you wouldn't understand" they either do not understand it, or are hiding something. Truly brilliant/intelligent people can explain complicated material in words that anyone can understand. Accept no substitute.
I have never found an exception to this assessment...
hh
6
posted on
02/19/2009 5:52:32 AM PST
by
hoosier hick
(Note to RINOs: We need "a choice not an echo"... (Barry Goldwater))
To: Libloather
If you simply listen to the global weather reports in the last 6 months with snow in the Middle East for the first time in hundreds of years, the canals freezing over in Holland, blizzards in the UK and record cold weather all over the US it is hard to accept that the earth is warming to a point of no return.
7
posted on
02/19/2009 5:54:06 AM PST
by
The Great RJ
("Mir we bleiwen wat mir sin" or "We want to remain what we are." ..Luxembourg motto)
To: The Great RJ
What do we want?
GLOBAL WARMING!
When do we want it?
NOW!
It really has frozen over. Click on Magslinger and scroll all the way down to see what I mean.
8
posted on
02/19/2009 6:02:08 AM PST
by
magslinger
(I talk to myself but sometimes I like a third opinion.)
To: magslinger
9
posted on
02/19/2009 6:09:42 AM PST
by
Kimmers
(Working hard so Obamas friends don't have to)
To: magslinger
It’s a cold day in Hell all right. But it’s a bit cooler here in NWI.
10
posted on
02/19/2009 6:12:35 AM PST
by
HoosierHawk
(Democrats - Looting American citizens for generations to come.)
To: Libloather
"You Dont Need a Weatherman" For anyone not familiar with this expression, here is where it comes from...
"Those who later formed the Weatherman organization produced a paper at the Students for a Democratic Society Convention in Chicago in June of 1969. With a nod to Bob Dylan, the sponsors titled their epistle: 'You Dont Need A Weatherman to Know Which Way the Wind Is Blowing.'"
http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=26243
"Dubbing itself the Weathermen, this new organization took its name from a line in Bob Dylans 'Subterranean Homesick Blues''you dont need a weatherman to know which way the wind blows'and within months had set off bombs at the National Guard headquarters and set in motion plans to bomb targets across the country"
http://www.pbs.org/independentlens/weatherunderground/film.html
"Johnny's in the basement
Mixing up the medicine
I'm on the pavement
Thinking about the government"
"Maggie comes fleet foot
Face full of black soot
Talkin' that the heat put
Plants in the bed but
The phone's tapped anyway
Maggie says that many say
They must bust in early May"
...
Look out kid
Don't matter what you did
Walk on your tip toes
Don't try "No Doz"
Better stay away from those
That carry around a fire hose
Keep a clean nose
Watch the plain clothes
You don't need a weather man
To know which way the wind blows"
http://www.bobdylan.com/#/songs/subterranean-homesick-blues
11
posted on
02/19/2009 6:17:50 AM PST
by
ETL
(Smoking gun evidence on ALL the ObamaRat-commie connections at my newly revised FR Home/About page)
To: hoosier hick
As a PhD physicist, I can tell you that you are exactly right.
12
posted on
02/19/2009 7:26:57 AM PST
by
expatpat
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson