Skip to comments.
Greenspan Suggests Bank Nationalization
Motley Fool ^
Posted on 02/18/2009 8:45:45 PM PST by djf
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-22 next last
He runs them into the ground by overextending them to the tune of hundreds of billions of dollars, throws "due diligence" down the drain, and now WANTS TO HAND IT OVER TO THE GOV TO RUN MORE EFFICIENTLY??
LMAO!!!
Somebody oughta get a rope!
1
posted on
02/18/2009 8:45:45 PM PST
by
djf
To: djf
Not with this gang of criminals in charge. They'll have the nitwits at ACORN running the show.
2
posted on
02/18/2009 8:47:12 PM PST
by
Major Matt Mason
(The Kenyan Keynesian will bankrupt this nation.)
Gee, sure. Greenspan’s always been right before..
3
posted on
02/18/2009 8:47:22 PM PST
by
D-fendr
(Deus non alligatur sacramentis sed nos alligamur.)
To: djf
Since when does the government assume temporary control of anything? The control will be permanent.
4
posted on
02/18/2009 8:50:18 PM PST
by
txnativegop
(God Bless America! (NRA-Endowment))
To: djf
How can you even understand what this muttering fool ever says anyway?
5
posted on
02/18/2009 8:51:46 PM PST
by
oldbill
To: djf
Nationalize the banks.
Nationalize the car companies.
Nationalize the housing stock.
Nationalize health care.
I never thought we'd fall so fast.
6
posted on
02/18/2009 8:52:41 PM PST
by
ClearCase_guy
(American Revolution II -- overdue)
To: oldbill
Well, he still has his supporters.
But then, so does Pol Pot!
7
posted on
02/18/2009 8:53:46 PM PST
by
djf
(NO FREE HOUSES!!!)
To: djf
Destroy it to save it, or whatever ...
8
posted on
02/18/2009 8:54:17 PM PST
by
ikka
(Brother, you asked for it!)
To: djf
It’s hard to believe that Greenspan was once part of Ayn Rand’s inner circle. He’s been swimming in dark waters ever since he married Andrea Mitchell.
9
posted on
02/18/2009 8:54:38 PM PST
by
ravinson
To: djf
I'd be willing to listen if (1) it really is temporary and there is a clear and binding path to re-privatization, and (2) that it really is something you might do once in a hundred years. I'd be skeptical of re-privatization under the current administration, however, that seems to want to absorb every private asset it can get its grubby mitts on. Given Greenspan's antecedents I'd love to hear him explain how he came to this conclusion.
To: djf
“...the least bad”...”the least bad”...!?
I'm assuming by that statement that anything that we do is
going to be bad.
Goverment control of anything is the “most bad” way forward, especially
in this “on going financial system collapse”.
11
posted on
02/18/2009 8:56:46 PM PST
by
Semper Mark
(As graceful as a bulldozer and as subtle as a wrecking ball.)
To: djf; All
Hey Al,
Guess you were right about “irrational exhuberance” ...
Too bad you didn’t have the kahones to stand up to Congress ...
Suck eggs - WEASEL!!!
12
posted on
02/18/2009 9:00:24 PM PST
by
Lmo56
To: Markos33
“Goverment control of anything is the most bad way forward, especially in this on going financial system collapse.
Unless you are the head of the government or his bootlickin’ buddy.
13
posted on
02/18/2009 9:01:15 PM PST
by
Beowulf9
To: djf
We need to nationalize his assets. Horse of a different color.
14
posted on
02/18/2009 9:03:13 PM PST
by
Dallas59
("You know the one with the big ears? He might be yours, but he ain't my president.")
To: Lmo56
Mr. Greenjeans was one of the primary architects of the “non-traditional mortgage products” flood.
We’re talking sub-prime here.
Thinking, as well as mortgages.
15
posted on
02/18/2009 9:06:14 PM PST
by
djf
(NO FREE HOUSES!!!)
To: Dallas59
“We need to nationalize his assets.”
Think Andrea Mitchell would kick him to the curb then?
16
posted on
02/18/2009 9:07:30 PM PST
by
Semper Mark
(As graceful as a bulldozer and as subtle as a wrecking ball.)
To: djf
swift and orderly restructuring? the federal government? since when has the federal government ever done anything swiftly and orderly that was actually a good thing?
17
posted on
02/18/2009 9:14:21 PM PST
by
madamemayhem
(Auntie Em: hate you, hate Kansas, took the dog. Dorothy)
To: djf
I’m sure Greenspan has an acute mental disorder of some kind that is a result of seeing Andrea Mitchell without clothes too many times.
The poor old guy probably doesn’t even know where he is half the time, and probably thinks he’s a toaster.
18
posted on
02/18/2009 9:18:43 PM PST
by
KoRn
(Autumn Has Come To The Tree of Liberty)
To: djf
Yeah, that's what we need, the government insiders taking total control of the banksters..
The same government that is not even capable of balancing a simple check book or budget.
19
posted on
02/18/2009 9:23:28 PM PST
by
dragnet2
To: ravinson
Greenspan is a Globalist....and Globalism is Liberalism with a little more money
20
posted on
02/18/2009 9:26:54 PM PST
by
UCFRoadWarrior
(The Biggest Threat To American Soverignty Is Rampant Economic Anti-Americanism)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-22 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson