Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TAdams8591

“But it is not my duty or my business or my responsibility or that of any taxpayer, to be forced into paying to raise, and feed and clothe these children, many of whom are brought into the world for that very purpose (to get mommy some free cash), also sickening, and in some cases, obscene.”

I agree.

“Furthermore, today’s situation is so bizarre, that young single motherhood, is becoming both equal in number and stature to married couple parenthood. As if one of those choices is as good as the other...it isn’t.”

Again, I agree. Single motherhood is becoming equal or held up as some standard that’s ok. It’s not ok. And fathers have no say whatsoever.

I disagree about the adoption part. The best scenario is of course two married parents. If that isn’t happening, and that’s something that happens, the bio family should raise the kid.

Adoption is good option, in some cases. It’s certainly not the best option or only option. And, just because there are many couples unable to have their own kids, it doesn’t entitle them to other people’s kids.


52 posted on 02/17/2009 8:24:06 PM PST by Twink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]


To: Twink
If that isn’t happening, and that’s something that happens, the bio family should raise the kid.

I'm not sure I agree. If the young people involved are basically responsible kids who screwed up but are willing to try to be good parents with the help of their parents, I do agree.

But if it's slacker mom and loser dad wandering their way through life...as good a grandma as I may be, I'm not going to make up for them. To decide that a child is going to have to deal with having two idiots for parents because the child is MY blood and I insist on keeping him/her, well, I think sometimes the kid is well rid of his/her parents.

55 posted on 02/17/2009 8:57:24 PM PST by Dianna (Obama Barbie: Governing is hard.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]

To: Twink
"And, just because there are many couples unable to have their own kids, it doesn’t entitle them to other people’s kids."

I don't think anyone on this thread made that point. I can assure you, from what I've witnessed, many single mothers with no support from a good family, and unable to properly provide for themselves, let alone their children, keep them, instead of giving them up for adoption. This helps to maintain a dependent class in society, with children who aren't adequately provided and cared for and means there are fewer children for adoption. Many of these children (though certainly not all) grow up to wreak havoc on society. The statistics in Coulter's book in this regard, though not surprising to me personally, are stunning.

61 posted on 02/17/2009 10:00:01 PM PST by TAdams8591 (When Obama FAILS, America SUCCEEDS.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]

To: Twink
Just one addition to reply #61 Twink.

It was very rare to encounter a person on my Probation/Parole caseload that came from a two parent family. Most came from single parent families headed by their mothers.

Sadly, the probationers/parolee's who were parents, were also not married and frequently had fathered multiple children by different women, and the women multiple children by different men. Unfortunately, that is what single parenthood leads to in many cases, and it becomes the norm and as generational as married parenthood.

As a country and a civil society, this does not bode well for our future.

71 posted on 02/17/2009 10:33:26 PM PST by TAdams8591 (When Obama FAILS, America SUCCEEDS.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson