“Sounds like she loses either way with you. If you want a politician who has no normal family issues you are going to have to find one from an alien civilization.”
She only loses under lemma b if she was negligent in her daughter’s upbringing—I don’t know that to be the case (but I sense that a lot of her defenders fear that that might indeed be the case).
Do you, for instance, seriously believe that Palin can any longer stand as a credible advocate for abstinence-based sex education—never mind abstinence-only?
It was probably mostly her child’s juvenile irresponsibility that created the situation, but we do circle back around to questions about thing like that.
IF the Gov. can’t be president on your terms, does that mean you can’t be a member of a church whose clergy has sex with children, other women, or with same sex.
That would take in all faiths.
Yes. Jesus hasn't come back so regular human beings are what we have to choose from.
I don’t know that to be the case...
That goes without saying.
It was probably mostly her child’s juvenile irresponsibility that created the situation, ...
Duh! Do you think so?
...but we do circle back around to questions about thing like that.
No, you circle back to that because you can't get your head out of the tabloids. That is the level of your political sophistication and that's the best you can do. Back to Britney.