Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Where did the idea of “millions of years” come from?
AiG ^ | Terry Mortenson

Posted on 02/17/2009 8:25:37 AM PST by GodGunsGuts

Where did the idea of “millions of years” come from?

All of our media outlets push evolution and “millions of years” ideas on the public. Even children’s cartoons reflect evolutionary philosophy! In an episode of the cartoon SpongeBob SquarePants, entitled “SpongeBob B.C.,” the narrator begins: “Ah, dawn breaks over the primordial sea. It is here that millions of years ago, life began taking its first clumsy steps out of the darkness, opening its newly formed eyeballs to stare into the blinding light of intelligence.” Unfortunately, large segments of the church have swallowed the millions-of-years evolutionary history hook, line, and sinker. But it was not always this way. In this chapter, we will discover where the idea of millions of years came from and why the church went along with it. We will see that science does not require it, but rather it is a necessity of uniformitarian geology and evolutionary theory...

(Excerpt) Read more at answersingenesis.org ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: abrahamwerner; charleshodge; charleslyell; charlesspurgeon; ciscofield; comtedebuffon; creation; derekager; disastrous; ernstmayr; evolution; georgescuvier; georgestanleyfaber; henrycole; henrymorris; intelligentdesign; jameshutton; jeanlamarck; johannlehmann; johnfleming; johnpyesmith; johnwhitcomb; johnwoodward; liberaltheology; nielssteensen; oldearthcompromise; pierrelaplace; roberthook; superposition; thomaschalmers; uniformitarian; uniformitarianism; williamsmith
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 261-270 next last
To: JimRed

relativity


61 posted on 02/17/2009 9:29:42 AM PST by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: GodGunsGuts

That extrapolation alone tells me you have no respect for the scientific method.


62 posted on 02/17/2009 9:30:10 AM PST by Alkhin (I never give them hell. I just tell the truth and they think it's hell. ~ Harry S Truman)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: chuckles

BINGO!


63 posted on 02/17/2009 9:31:10 AM PST by Retired Greyhound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: jimmyray

[[If the universe is only 14.7 billion years old, how can you possibly see objects that are located tens of billions of light years from the earth?]]

Shhhh. Don’t confuse em with hte dirty little secrets that plague their hypothesis. This is a problem old earthers are ‘looking into’ but isn’t it amusing that they wave a hand of dismissal for problems liek htis when they turn right around and say things liek “If the earth is only 6000 years old, how did ‘ancient’ starlight reach the earth’? The SAME ‘Problem’ that faces Young earth also plagues htem, but it’s fine for htem because their hypothesis is ‘scientificy’


64 posted on 02/17/2009 9:32:04 AM PST by CottShop (Scientific belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Polybius; GodGunsGuts

You’re missing the key point. Because, after the eruption of Mt. St. Helens, geologists learned that a specific extrusive volcanic process related to Stratavolcanoes could happen faster than they had envisioned, it allows the Young Earthers to post a picture of a 25-foot deep formation, and then jam their fingers in their ears and go ‘nyah, nyah nyah’ when asked to explain the extremely varied 6,000 foot geological column of the Grand Canyon with a Young Earth model. They will simply say the flood could have cut it without any kind of rational explaination of the formations that compose it.


65 posted on 02/17/2009 9:33:16 AM PST by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Bobkk47

“overwhelming and irrefutable”

Were you there 4 1/2 billion years ago?

How do you know that God didn’t create the world so that it would appear to be 4 billion years old?

The point: nobody knows for certain.


66 posted on 02/17/2009 9:34:22 AM PST by Retired Greyhound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Alkhin

Ventura county, according to the website.


67 posted on 02/17/2009 9:35:55 AM PST by mysterio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Retired Greyhound
How do you know that God didn’t create the world so that it would appear to be 4 billion years old?

Ah, so all those fossils and widely varied geological formations are just one big practical joke.

68 posted on 02/17/2009 9:37:07 AM PST by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: GodGunsGuts; dirtboy
Speaking as a life-long Republican, I am absolutely stone-cold embarrassed by the anti-science stuff coming from religious fundamentalists who claim to be "real" political conservatives. Believe what you want to believe, but stop trying to force others to believe as you do. You give the political conservative movement a bad name.

Many of our nation's greatest Founders embraced the scientific advances of their day. They were men of the Enlightenment who were widely read in an astonishingly wide range of subjects. A single example: Benjamin Franklin was our nation's first international superstar. Why? Because of his scientific experiments with electricity, and because of his many inventions.

Advances in science have given us so much, from medicine to the computer you use to post your anti-science drivel. If you just open your eyes and observe the world around you, perhaps you'll grasp the fact that human beings have, indeed, evolved. We were once a species that lived in caves, eaking out a living through a hunter-gather lifestyle. Thanks to our inquiring, creative minds, we have evolved into a species that can go to the local supermarket for our food. Instead of living in caves or out on some savannah, we live in comfortable homes, heated in winter and often air-conditioned in summer. Advances in medical science allow us to live free from the fear of all the many diseases that used to sweep through human populations like waves of wildfire. Our food and water are safer thanks to scientific advances.

We traverse long distances in a few hours thanks to the machines advances in science have enabled us to build. We can speak with business associates around the world on little phones we carry in our pockets. We can entertain ourselves with moving images on screens and music on little devices. I, a 21st century human, can hit "post" and instantly send this message to you, a Dark Ages troglodyte. If that isn't evolution, what is?

69 posted on 02/17/2009 9:40:28 AM PST by Wolfstar (Elections have thousands of consequences. Some minor, some major...and some that can kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: GodGunsGuts
That actually appears as though it formed quite rapidly, don’t you think?

No.
70 posted on 02/17/2009 9:41:36 AM PST by mysterio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy
Ah, so all those fossils and widely varied geological formations are just one big practical joke.

Maybe. Why not? Neither of us were there.

71 posted on 02/17/2009 9:44:41 AM PST by Retired Greyhound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: GodGunsGuts
The idea of millions of years comes from the Catholic Church, from Origen of Alexandria (185-254 AD);

Combining the Stoic doctrine of a universe without beginning with the Biblical doctrine of the beginning and the end of the world, he conceived of the visible world as the stages of an eternal cosmic process, affording also an explanation of the diversity of human fortunes, rewards, and punishments.

72 posted on 02/17/2009 9:46:43 AM PST by <1/1,000,000th%
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Retired Greyhound
Maybe. Why not? Neither of us were there.

And this is why reasoned debate is impossible. You basiclly fall back on the notion that the geological history of the world is a Divine joke.

73 posted on 02/17/2009 9:49:03 AM PST by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: CottShop; jimmyray
[[If the universe is only 14.7 billion years old, how can you possibly see objects that are located tens of billions of light years from the earth?]]

Maybe you could provide the names of your objects that are tens of billions of light years away from the earth.

There are no such objects in the scientific literature.

74 posted on 02/17/2009 9:53:04 AM PST by <1/1,000,000th%
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: <1/1,000,000th%
See post 45, which states "How do “young earth” creationists explain the existence of objects in space, such as quasars, that are located tens of billions of light years from the earth?"

Simply responding to a stement made. However, we both know the current theory does not assert such, I was just pointing out the mistake. :-)

75 posted on 02/17/2009 10:06:52 AM PST by jimmyray
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: Ditto; GodGunsGuts
Then again, some folks don't believe in the speed of light.

Some have empirically demonstrated that it has slowed.
shalom b'SHEM Yah'shua HaMashiach Adonai
76 posted on 02/17/2009 10:07:33 AM PST by Uri’el-2012 (Psalm 78:35 And they remembered that God was their ROCK, And the Most High God their Redeemer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Fiji Hill

See my post #74.


77 posted on 02/17/2009 10:10:30 AM PST by <1/1,000,000th%
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: CottShop; jimmyray

Sorry. I missed that one.


78 posted on 02/17/2009 10:11:16 AM PST by <1/1,000,000th%
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: <1/1,000,000th%

http://www.angelfire.com/az/BIGBANGisWRONG/index.html


79 posted on 02/17/2009 10:13:32 AM PST by CottShop (Scientific belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: GodGunsGuts
Ok, I am NOT an evolutionists, nor am I a creationists, in fact I usually argue against most evo ideas. I have a theory about the origin of life, the universe and everything, but that is neither here nor there. I will say that anyone who actually believes the earth is only 6,000 years old has rocks in their heads. If we hold strictly to creationism, several questions beg to be answered. 1.)Why is there no mention of Dinos in the bible? Huge animals capable of swallowing a human in one gulp would surely rate a mention. Man, and all animals were supposedly created together, so why doesn't man have a record of these huge creatures? The answer is simple, we didn't exist when they did, period. 2.)The record of man, real records, goes back more than 6,000 years. All you have to do is go back to the actual written records, which can easily be traced back to about 4,000 years ago, then look at the artifacts of Humans who lived before that, 6,000 years easily, and more. Earth may not be billions of years old, but is a damn site older than 6,000.

Creationists need to get over the idea that evolution, in some form not Darwinism(Darwin was wrong and has been proved to be to anyone not brainwashed to believe in his theory), is not incompatible with creation. Also, please quote me chapter and verse where the bible actually says that the earth is only 6,000 years old.

80 posted on 02/17/2009 10:19:59 AM PST by calex59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 261-270 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson