[swain_forkbeard]

Should this be done in EVERY case of IVF?

[Kieri]

This woman had:

1) No job;

2) Was receiving disability payments (which means her health was in question);

3) No house;

4) Lives with her parents, and

5) Had no private health coverage.

In other words, no PERSONAL financial responsibility for paying the costs of raising these kids. Why bother when the taxpayers can be extorted instead?

[gimme1ibertee]

Should this be done in EVERY case of IVF?

Of course not. Many infertile couples seek IVF as a means to bring children into the world,not as a means of sucking the taxpayers dry,or out of some perverse need to have something to cuddle and dress up like a doll,but because they REALLY love children and want to be parents.There should be guidelines for IVF,such as age limits,personal history (married,single,etc.),and income.Even my cat knows that if you don't have a job,or a home of your own,and six other kids without fathers,YOU DON'T HAVE ANY MORE.