Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Conn. Judge Suspended for Directing Racial Slurs at Arresting Officers After DUI Stop
law.com ^ | 2-10-09 | Dave Collins

Posted on 02/10/2009 8:28:38 AM PST by stan_sipple

A Connecticut Superior Court judge charged with drunken driving and using racial slurs while arguing with police officers was suspended Monday for 240 days by a judicial review panel. Judge E. Curtissa Cofield, who was confirmed as Connecticut's first black female judge in 1991, had apologized to the state Judicial Review Council earlier in the day, calling the night of her arrest "one of the worst experiences of my life." Cofield was arrested the night of Oct. 9 after her car hit a parked state police cruiser in a construction zone on Route 2 in Glastonbury, Conn. Police say she told them she hadn't had any alcohol, but she failed a sobriety test. Urine tests later that night showed she had a blood-alcohol level of twice the legal limit of 0.08. She also argued with state and Glastonbury police officers. A surveillance camera at the Glastonbury police department captured the exchanges on video, which shows her using the N-word, calling a black state trooper "Negro," threatening that trooper's job, referring to a female officer as "little girl" and "Barbie" and using other offensive language. "When I watched the video, I did not recognize myself," Cofield told the council. "The woman I observed that night is not the woman I am."Judge Susan S. Reynolds appeared to stump Cofield when she asked why Cofield's comments were not racist. "Why is it not racism .... hmmm. I think for crimes like bias you have to have intent," Cofield said. "All I can say is I was really intoxicated. ... I can't explain it. Why is it not racism ... I don't know. But if it is or someone perceives that it is, I apologize for that."

(Excerpt) Read more at law.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; US: Connecticut
KEYWORDS: discipline; drunkdriving; judges; notreadyforprimetime; reverseracism
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 last
To: monday

Yes, although plenty of people who hit stopped cars just pull away and speed off. It would be interesting to know if she tried to do that — I wouldn’t put it past her. I once observed from an apartment window in Queens, NYC, a car sideswipe a stopped fire truck (with lights flashing, as it was on a fire call), and then proceed to sideswipe a few more parked cars as it tried to get away. NYC firefighters put a stop to that — hauled the guy out of his car and pinned him against it, until police arrived.


41 posted on 02/10/2009 9:31:39 AM PST by GovernmentShrinker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: stan_sipple
I think Obambi just found his first Supreme Court Nominee.
42 posted on 02/10/2009 9:34:44 AM PST by Doomonyou (Let them eat lead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: monday
No, it hasn't been a racial slur, it has been Politically Un-correct to use it but not a slur. BTW, I have been right here in the US for a lot longer than the last 30 years.

The main gist of my comment was that they are raising more hell about her arguing with the officer(which is common with many drunks)than about here driving drunk!

43 posted on 02/10/2009 9:37:33 AM PST by calex59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Mojave

“Her car” just did that by itself, I guess - or so one might ascertain from the “facts” presented in the article.

I wonder why the story did not say: “...she drove her car into a parked state police cruiser”.


44 posted on 02/10/2009 9:43:23 AM PST by WayneS (Respect the 2nd Amendment; Repeal the 16th)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Doomonyou

Yup.


45 posted on 02/10/2009 9:46:40 AM PST by WayneS (Respect the 2nd Amendment; Repeal the 16th)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: OldSmaj
“As it stands now, I can be politically correct whilst standing in public and shouting “F-word”, “S-word”, and “N-word”, right?”

Your post doesn't really make much sense. If you mean to be offensive there is no reason to say N-word instead of the real thing. Standing in public shouting N-word is likely going to be just as offensive as using the real thing so you might as well use it. The reason it would be as offensive is that shouting anything in public in that way is offensive.

On the other hand if you are trying to be offensive, calling someone an "N-word" might get the reaction you are looking for, but it might just get you laughed at. What it won't be is politically correct.

The reason N-word is used instead of the real thing is the same reason F-word is used instead of the real thing. To avoid needlessly exposing children to the word, even though most kids above the age of ten know both already, still it's best not to encourage them to use them. It has nothing to do with political correctness. It's something people in polite society do as a courtesy.

46 posted on 02/10/2009 9:47:00 AM PST by monday
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

Comment #47 Removed by Moderator

To: calex59
“No, it hasn't been a racial slur, it has been Politically Un-correct to use it but not a slur. BTW, I have been right here in the US for a lot longer than the last 30 years.”

It depends on how it is used. After all it simply means "black" in Spanish. If you are doing a research paper and use Negro it's kind of fallen out of style, especially since the official language of the country is English, not Spanish, but I doubt you would be called racist. If however you used it as a way to address someone who was black and you used it in an insulting tone of voice like this woman did, then it most certainly is racist. Her use of the terms “barbie” and “little girl” to address a white female officer were also racist in their connotations.

BTW I am about the least PC person you will ever meet, but that doesn't mean I go around using language that I know might offend someone. It's simple courtesy to avoid using terms that might offend someone, that is unless you intend to offend them, and then courtesy goes out the window.

48 posted on 02/10/2009 10:05:33 AM PST by monday
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: calex59
Notice that she didn't get suspended for drunk driving but for making racial slurs to a officer.

It's the thought that counts.

I, personally, don't give a rat's behind what kind of slurs she made to the officer but find it extremely bothersome that this so called "superior court judge" was driving around drunk. Also, she is black, so how can she have made racial slurs to a black cop?

Yes, I thought the "N" word was a term of endearment among the melanin-enhanced.

To top it off they use the word Negro as an example of a racial slur. When did that become a "racial" slur?

Maybe it sounds too much like "the word which whites cannot say" + O?

49 posted on 02/10/2009 10:09:37 AM PST by nonsporting
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: monday
Your post doesn't really make much sense.

You do understand sarcasm?

As in: Sarcasm is a form of speech or writing which is bitter or cutting, being intended to taunt its target.?

I give up.

Some people will be offended if you hung them with a new rope.

50 posted on 02/10/2009 1:15:53 PM PST by OldSmaj (I oppose BO. I am now TREASONOUS. To hell with Hussein.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson