Skip to comments.
Bank Bailout Plan Revamped
online.wsj.com via Drudge ^
| 2/9/09
| Solomon and Paletta
Posted on 02/08/2009 6:38:19 PM PST by nicolezmomma
Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner is expected to announce that the government will become a partner with the private sector to purchase banks' troubled assets, according to people familiar with the matter.
The plan for a so-called aggregator bank, a variation on a theme that Obama administration officials have wrestled with for weeks, is among four main components of Mr. Geithner's bailout revamp, which he is expected to announce Tuesday......
(Excerpt) Read more at online.wsj.com ...
TOPICS: Business/Economy; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bailout; banking; banks; barf; bho44; bhotreasury; firsthundreddays; geithner; obama
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
We have been trying for a month to buy a bank-owned property. I think they are holding on to it hoping the government (taxpayer) will give them a better offer than we have. Why should the taxpayer pay for their bad judgement? I am totally against a 'bad asset' bank being created.
To: nicolezmomma
guess their trying to forget about the missing 78 billion
2
posted on
02/08/2009 6:40:18 PM PST
by
Doogle
(USAF.68-73..8th TFW Ubon Thailand..never store a threat you should have eliminated))
To: nicolezmomma
The Treasury's working theory for the government/private-sector partnership is that investors wouldn't overpay, because if they did, they'd stand to lose money; but they also wouldn't underpay, since the selling banks wouldn't be willing to part with their assets too cheaply.The banks will inflate the actual value of these assets and dump them on the government (taxpayer). There is no incentive for them to do anything else as there are few buyers out there.
To: nicolezmomma
The Federal government creates more problems than it solves. It had no qualms about forcing lenders to make bad loans. Now it’s going to buy the bad loans. With our money. My guess is that the next move will be to renegotiate the toxic mortgages. Around and around we go, all financed by the taxpayers - if there are any.
4
posted on
02/08/2009 6:42:38 PM PST
by
popdonnelly
(The problem with Obama is that he believes his own hype.)
To: nicolezmomma
To: nicolezmomma
The banks will inflate the actual value of these assets and dump them on the government (taxpayer).
*****************************************************
And then the gov’t massively inflates the dollar.. savers are suckers.. people that pay their bills are suckers ,, welfare moms will be looked at as if they’re Warren Buffet.
To: nicolezmomma
All this because the government forced the banks to make bad loans on property for far more than the property was worth.
To: HangnJudge
Who has the Geithner Tax Cheat image?
To: nicolezmomma
The plan could include a mechanism to determine the value of homes facing foreclosure, which could speed negotiations with borrowers. The difficulty of valuing such homes is one reason many loan-modification efforts have stalledDoes this mean they are going to write down mortgages?
9
posted on
02/08/2009 7:09:01 PM PST
by
dawn53
To: nicolezmomma
I believe that. My bank got $243 million and then stopped lending.
10
posted on
02/08/2009 7:13:45 PM PST
by
1010RD
(First Do No Harm)
To: screaminsunshine; dawn53; TigerLikesRooster; M. Espinola; All
11
posted on
02/08/2009 7:20:13 PM PST
by
ex-Texan
(Ecclesiastes 5:10 - 20)
To: nicolezmomma
the door is now open and the government has stepped inside - within four years the banks will be nationalized.
They are working fast to consolidate their election victory and move the US into European socialism - the Obama team goal
12
posted on
02/08/2009 7:23:39 PM PST
by
elpadre
(nation)
To: ex-Texan
hill and bill will rescue them via king obama false messiah.
To: nicolezmomma
Baby step by baby step, the US banks are being nationalized.
And America takes another step towards turd world status.
14
posted on
02/08/2009 7:41:46 PM PST
by
upchuck
(I'm glad I'm old. Thus I can remember when America was a decent, moral, God fearing country.)
To: nicolezmomma
"Some critical elements remained unclear, including exactly how the government would entice investors to participate in the private bank, given that they can already buy soured assets on the open market if they want to."
So, part of the brilliant government plan is to HOPE private investors CHANGE their minds and suddenly realize this is a great deal.
15
posted on
02/08/2009 7:49:13 PM PST
by
javachip
(TARP - proof there is no situation so bad that government can't make it worse.)
To: screaminsunshine
If that were true than why is it that only one of the bailed out banks ever applied for CRA Credits?
Just stop it with the Kool-aid man.
16
posted on
02/08/2009 7:55:24 PM PST
by
Tempest
(Greed is putting money before PEOPLE.)
To: nicolezmomma
Bank Bailout Plan Revamped Sorry to be totally crass, but isn't this like a "working girl" sponging off after her last appointment? I am SO SICK of of this freak show.
17
posted on
02/08/2009 8:01:22 PM PST
by
PistolPaknMama
(We're mad, but when do we get REALLY mad?)
To: nicolezmomma
Every bank executive in the USA is trying to unload these "assets" (actually, these things are collateralized debt obligations that were created by the five now non-existing Wall Street merchant banks) onto dumb ol' Uncle Sugar. Why would you think that the morons in government would understand the ol' switcheroo?
The banks paid the equivalent of $1,000 per CDO bond and they want the $1,000 back from Uncle Sugar. The CDO is worth between $0 and $1,000 depending on who pays what bills so Uncle Sugar gets to hold the asset and see what happens. If everyone pays their bills, Uncle Sugar could make some money (not that the constitution allows it to make money in this way) BUT... if people don't pay all of their bills, the CDO bonds are worth less (or worthless) than Uncle Sugar paid and WE/YOU/TAXPAYOR gets stuck with the loss. Zimple, no?
18
posted on
02/08/2009 8:19:22 PM PST
by
April Lexington
(Study the constitution so you know what they are taking away!)
To: Doogle
The banks are using it to cover credit card debt.
19
posted on
02/09/2009 5:05:28 AM PST
by
huldah1776
( Worthy is the Lamb)
To: nicolezmomma
20
posted on
02/09/2009 5:57:51 AM PST
by
2harddrive
(...House a TOTAL Loss.....)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson