Posted on 02/08/2009 2:18:31 PM PST by NoLibZone
I didn’t think so, even though my initial reaction was a little animated. LOL
I really wish those who post type of stuff this would take a second and read before pulling the trigger, because, honestly, it makes us all look bad.
Boy Zero is moving terrorist sleeper cells into US with tax payers money!
You are right!!! Take a look at the following very DISTURBING video:
Barack Hussein Obama & Khalid Al-Mansour
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s81P8T4UX40
It does. It's all based on the name of the sub-agency doing the funding. $23 million in aid to Gaza which I support. Hundreds of millions under GWB which in my mind are questionable in many instances. It's an arguement that goes nowhere, and most people are clueless, but out there in the middle there are a few who read this stuff and thing, what are they talking about.
You don’t have to wait anymore.
http://www.crossroad.to/Quotes/1-government/amendments/proposed-amendments.htm
111 Congress; as of 1/26/09
H.J.RES.5 : Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to repeal the twenty-second article of amendment, thereby removing the limitation on the number of terms an individual may serve as President.
Sponsor: Rep Serrano, Jose E. [NY-16] (introduced 1/6/09)
Cosponsors (0)
Obama is not only STUPID but damn right NUTS! He does not under the safety issues around letting people like this into the country.
If ONE of these MUZZIE A-holes kills an American, I would not bet against some sort of large civil uprising.
I only see that it authorizes about $20 million in assistance.
There was once this thing called the congress. A president once had to get expenditures approved through congress before he could obligate funds for any project. It seems that is no longer the case.
Why is there no outrage from the house or senate?
“There was once this thing called the congress. A president once had to get expenditures approved through congress before he could obligate funds for any project. It seems that is no longer the case.
Why is there no outrage from the house or senate?”
<<Perhaps they have been distracted fighting Porkulus?
Executive order (United States) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopediaJan 22, 2009 ... [3] Congress may overturn an executive order by passing legislation in conflict with it or by refusing to approve funding to enforce it. ...
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Executive_order_(United_States) - 43k -
I'll start responding from the bottom of the thread, and don't know how far I'll get.
From what I've read, the reason there's no outrage is because the article's premise is a fraud. You're reacting to the right wing equivalent of Code Pink.
Why is there no outrage from the Jewish population?
If you'd like to be on or off, please FR mail me.
----------------------------
I pinged a couple of these, of many, this may be the last. There's nothing in the directive that suggests we're going to be encouraging immigration from Gaza.
Yes, in the past State has encouraged immigration of Muslims, I've posted the page on several occasions, but I can't now, because it's gone.
This is the type of BS that makes the right look like a bunch of lunatics.
I read it too and there is no authorization for immigration to the US.
This kind of distortion of the truth is not good for FR or for anyone.
I agree. Even some of the satire is not funny to me. There is nothing funny about the condition in which we find our country. We should be finding our way out of this morass that we find ourselves.
God help us all.
For what? I'm Jewish, I support supplying humanitarian aid. Israel supplies humanitarian aid, so does most of the world. What should I be outraged about?
If you bought into that they're bringing the terrorists here nonsense, I'm sorry, but there are nutballs on the right too. That's not what this directive was about. And it was tiny, a stinking 20 million, GWB supplied 50 times that.
Both of you, stop posting immediately.
I REALLY wanted this to be satire! :o( He’s going to be the death of America/Americans!! We don’t need any more terrorists in America. We have enough of them in Congress. lol..
That being said, sending that amount of cash to a terrorist regime doesn't seem to be too wise.
Given the fact that these folks will trade a bag of beans for a bullet, allowing their own people to starve, I'm sure the money will be used for humanitarian purposes.
I agree (but not yet). Too many people voted for this a$$ to easily believe anything negative reported about him. He needs to be around long enough to not only do the things he has said he's going to do but for the results of the things he's done to be made known. Then, maybe, some of the idiots who voted for him will be ready to vote for someone else...
Oh God, please help us! I can think of no worse curse than for Obama to want to bring Hamas people to the USA.
Yep, I don’t think distortig things to make O look worse gives anything to the argument against him. Or other such stuff,,making fun of Michelle, jumping on every word he says. We need to keep our powder dry and use the truth against him.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.