"What it really comes down to is Goldman Sachs does not have control of its own destiny," said James Ellman, head of San Francisco-based Seacliff Capital, a hedge fund specializing in financial services. "The President of the United States does and the President of the United States will tell us in 3 to 4 days what Goldman Sachs' options are."
Works for me.
“Small business man wants to return ‘loan’ to mafia.”
Good luck getting Guido to agree!
LOL. Guess Government Sachs didn’t bring a long enough spoon....
Well, they do have a large legal staff. They could question the initial legal validity of being required to take the money, and the government would cave, not wanting the issue to be tried in court with uncertain results.
Really? You didn’t know this would happen?
Open Secrets says YOU ASKED FOR THIS CRAP!!!
Along with 90% of ALL GOLDMAN donations.
VINIAR, DAVID
RIDGEWOOD,NJ 07450 GOLDMAN, SACHS & CO/CFO 9/13/08 $2,300 Obama, Barack (D)
755 GOLDMAN SACHS DONATIONS FOR BARAK OBAMA ALONE TOTALING $830,341
I HOPE YOU BURN IN HELL, BIOTCH!
Call 9-wa-wa, asshat!
Once you’re in the governments pocket, you ain’t never getting out.
You idiots at Goldman Sachs wanted the money and you wanted this guy.
Enjoy your limited salaries, captains of socialism.
Welcome to the Hotel Socialisma.
You can check out any time...
Asd they say, the grass isn’t always greener, buddy.
I read a report posted here earlier that said the Government wanted to convert its holdings from preferred shares (non-voting) to common stock (voting).
David Viniar.....one of 25 highest paid men
http://money.cnn.com/galleries/2007/fortune/0709/gallery.women_men_highest_pay.fortune/21.html
anybody as naive about human affairs, has no business anywhere near that much money or that much government!!!
That they can give it back and want to tells us a lot about how our $700B was spent.
I read a report posted here in the wee small hours that the Government wants to convert its holdings from preferred shares (non-voting) to common stock (voting).
This is great. It means these guys woke up to what taking money from the Federal government means. Obama’s executive order is a great way to stop people from asking for bailout money - an unintended consequence.
Translation: “My pay is going to be WHAT?!?!?”
These clowns are playing rope a dope, they want to pay it back, sure, now if the tax payers would just take these loans, for the amount. Book value 10B, actual cash value 10 cents.
re: major financial firms have done seemingly little to rein in their spending despite
Would that it were that simple. Firms with budgets in the millions or billions of dollars and operations all over the world are bound by contracts that were entered into earlier. Most courts take a dim view of one or the other side in a contractual agreement violating it.
This is not said to in any way lessen the disgust I have for the firms involved, or minimize the problems I hope they discover attached to government largess, but it’s a fact of life.
Q: How many Ivy League MBA’s does it take to run an investment banking firm into the ground?
Well well well.
So much for the necessity of that bailout cash. Threaten them with executive salary caps in return for feeding at the trough and the pauper act comes to an end.
What a mess.