[GodGunsGuts]

Dude, stop pinging me. You are ignorant, a slanderer, and a liar. Get lost.

For all those interested in the kind of “Christian” and “Scientist” DallasMike is, please read the following.

DallasMike the slanderer:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2175104/posts?q=1&;page=51#85

Here is where I correct DallasMike’s slander:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2175104/posts?q=1&;page=51#97

Here is where DallasMike confuses inflation with expansion, and then uses a link that actually states just the opposite to call the creationist author of the original article a “liar.”

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2175104/posts?q=1&;page=201#229

Here is where I point out that his own link says just the opposite, namely that inflation is not observed, and was postulated to fix problems with the Big Bang:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2175104/posts?q=1&;page=201#237

But DallasMike keeps posting the same balderdash confusing inflation with expansion. I finally ask Mr. “Scientist” if he knows the difference between inflation and expansion here:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2175104/posts?page=245#245

...and here:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2175104/posts?page=245#246

And then DallasMike, the great Christian and “scientist has the audacity to pretend he knew the difference all along:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2175104/posts?q=1&;page=251#257

And then after fraudulantly trying to claim that he knew the difference all along, he repeats the same claim (which he now knows is a lie) all over again further down the thread:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2175104/posts?page=290#290

This isn’t about whether DallasMike is an OEC or a YEC. If DallasMike were on my side of the debate and I caught him slandering and lying, I would call him on it in a second. As you can see, I called him on his slander and dishonesty and it didn’t make the slightest bit of difference. Therefore, I want nothing to do with DallasMike.

[MrB]

speaking of unwanted pinging...
I’m grateful that you include me on the creation threads,
but I really don’t want to be in on the urinating contests... so to speak...

[Fichori]

Technique #3 - ‘TOPIC DILUTION’...(Among others)

Yep, he's trolling all right.

His MO appears to be nearly identical to those of just about every other disrupter from DC.

He also knowns what he is doing. (no amateur)


Just ignore him for now. (My source tells me they hate being ignored)

I'll let you know if I find anything pertinent.

[DallasMike]

1. As the moderators told you the other night, I have a perfect right to respond to things that you post. In fact, if I mention you in a post, it is standard FR etiquette to include you in the ping. I'm just being a good Freeper. If you don't want me to respond to your posts, then don't post. If you want the moderators to explain things to you again, I'm sure that others would be happy to oblige. I won't do that to you though.
2. You totally misrepresent or misunderstand me, which is not the first time. According to NASA:

   The Inflation Theory proposes a period of extremely rapid (exponential) expansion of the universe during its first few moments. It was developed around 1980 to explain several puzzles with the standard Big Bang theory, in which the universe expands relatively gradually throughout its history. ... Inflation is now considered an extension of the Big Bang theory....

   Get it? Inflation was a very early and special moment in the ongoing expansion of the universe, but it is nothing more than an extension of the Big Bang theory. The inflation theory was proposed to explain observational problems with the initial Big Bang theory: the Horizon Problem, the Flatness Problem, and the Monopole Problem).

   The site I linked to talked about both inflation and expansion. Could I have worded myself a bit more technically? Certainly, but I try to keep things simple for non-scientists. In case you haven't noticed, I usually link to simplified explanations rather than highly technical explanations out of courtesy for those who do not have scientific backgrounds. This is just a modestly complex technical paper on the monopole problem. While appropriate on a technical forum, I don't think that it would be helpful to post on your threads because the audience is different.

3. It's interesting that I am not hesitant to compliment you when you've done well. If only you could return the same respect.

[LoneRangerMassachusetts]

Dude, stop pinging me. You are ignorant, a slanderer, and a liar. Get lost.

You had quite a list there. Did you mean to say dudes? If you meant me, and you don't want to hear from me then don't post provocative stuff on the forum. Otherwise, suck it up.