Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama Orders Costly Energy Standards on Appliances
newsmax.com/ ^ | Thursday, February 5, 2009 | Associated Press

Posted on 02/05/2009 2:45:23 PM PST by shielagolden

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 last
To: shielagolden
conserve tremendous amounts of energy,

We have plenty of oil. Drill here, drill now.

41 posted on 02/05/2009 3:54:17 PM PST by BerryDingle (I know how to deal with communists, I still wear their scars on my back from Hollywood-Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shielagolden

There are two approaches to things, the leftist approach and the smart approach.

The leftist approach is to always strive for shortage and rationing. And if no shortage exists, then they manufacture shortage and propagandize that it exists anyway. This is because they want to use shortage to get political power and control over others.

The leftists are always dead-set against the smart approach, because it leads to abundance for everyone, freedom of choice, and it diminishes the control of others over people’s personal lives.

I saw a very good example of this many years ago, when leftists were propagandizing in favor of water shortage in my western State. As such, they were beating the drum for “raising public awareness” (a euphemism for “propagandizing”) of the public about the residential conservation of water.

However, a short time before, it was noted that mining, agriculture and industrial uses of water were 98% of the water use in our State, *and* that the mining industry had decided to recycle its water, which overnight raised our State water availability by ONE THIRD.

But when this was pointed out to them, they insisted that the public still had to conserve water, because they needed their “awareness raised” about the important of water conservation.

Bull crap.

Now, I say this in context of what Obama is proposing, for a different reason. He is up to serious no good with this. Why?

Among the appliances he talked about, he mentioned “lamps”.

Lamps are not an appliance. In fact, they are the simplest electronic circuit. Power in, power out, and a resistor - a light bulb, in the middle.

If you “conserve” energy in a lamp, it means that you are either using a smaller resistor, such as a dimmer bulb, or you are running less current through the bulb.

Congress has already mandated that incandescent light bulbs are to soon no longer be produced. Starting with 100 Watt light bulbs, in 2012, and ending with 40 Watt light bulbs in 2014 (SO STOCK UP NOW!)

So how the heck else could lamps conserve energy?

But rest assured, this nonsense is going to be like the low water use toilets that don’t work, we are now forced to use. And the low water use shower heads, that make showers last twice as long to get clean, that we are now forced to use.

So it would be a good idea to invest in a few extra lamps to have around the house, before whatever stupid idea they come up to screw them up comes out.

Yes, black marketeers now import real toilets from Mexico, and you can tear the entrails out of a low water use shower head to make it work right. And yes, you can stock up on hundreds of incandescent light bulbs, and lamps that work like they’re supposed to.

But we shouldn’t HAVE to do this. It is just more hassles these power hungry fools want to lay on our shoulders.


42 posted on 02/05/2009 3:57:52 PM PST by yefragetuwrabrumuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shielagolden

Talk about Micro-managing?! :(


43 posted on 02/05/2009 4:08:44 PM PST by Freedom56v2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kanawa
Is that the grandpa who raised Obama?
44 posted on 02/05/2009 4:11:10 PM PST by 1010RD (First Do No Harm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: shielagolden
Obama Orders Costly Energy Standards on Appliances

We live to serve, my liege.

45 posted on 02/05/2009 4:16:57 PM PST by Maceman (If you're not getting a tax cut, you're getting a pay cut.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goodnesswins

preheating the convection oven ...

Evidently your timing was off. My daughter bought an oven that can be convection or regular when they were still a novelty and it has been a really great appliance. I wonder how it would compare to today’s version when it comes to efficiency and energy savings as it sounds like today’s is overdone with enegry saving items.


46 posted on 02/05/2009 4:22:17 PM PST by newhouse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: newhouse

How old is your daughters oven?


47 posted on 02/05/2009 4:28:38 PM PST by goodnesswins (Tell the truth - GOEBBELIZATION (propaganda) is what many voters suffer from.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: shielagolden
New day, MORE GOVERNMENT CONTROL OVER OUR LIVES. Welcome folks, not to socialism, THIS IS COMMUNISM. Total government control over EVERY aspect of your life.
48 posted on 02/05/2009 4:29:59 PM PST by RetiredArmy (Oscuma is a dope smoking, Chicago gangland punk- street thug. Simple as that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1010RD
Is that the grandpa who raised Obama?

No, but grandpa was a fellow traveler.

49 posted on 02/05/2009 4:36:01 PM PST by kanawa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: shielagolden

Time to get any appliance you might have been thinking of getting. Get it before they are rendered functionally useless like low flow toilets.


50 posted on 02/05/2009 5:16:07 PM PST by TigersEye (This is the age of the death of reason.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: USFRIENDINVICTORIA

“the low-lying fruit has already been picked. Efficiencies were improved a lot during the ‘70’s and 80’s — and we’re now well into diminishing-returns territory. “

An astute observation, and so true. Unfortunately the greenies don’t give a damn and will continue to demand huge reductions. I have my doubts that the money we save will even begin to pay for the costs of such directives.


51 posted on 02/05/2009 6:18:20 PM PST by EEDUDE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: shielagolden

they ( the libs) think it’ll make more jobs putting these silly rules ito effect

Make work


52 posted on 02/05/2009 6:25:35 PM PST by yldstrk (My heros have always been cowboys--Reagan and Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson