Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ann Coulter: SECONDHAND CHILDREN
AnnCoulter.com ^ | 2/4/09 | Ann Coulter

Posted on 02/04/2009 2:26:31 PM PST by pissant

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-75 next last
To: freedumb2003

Haven’t got time to Google it up. I’m sure you can dig it up if you’re interested. But just think about it. Do you really expect the now infant children of young widows whose husbands got killed in Iraq, will grow up to have outcomes comparable to those of the average single mother, who is a ghetto-dwelling, high school dropout, 2nd/3rd/4th generation welfare addict with substance abuse problems and a string of long rap-sheeted live-in boyfriends leaving her with a string of babies? Though I know the studies have been done, I don’t really need to see them to know that these two groups of children won’t have remotely comparable outcomes.


21 posted on 02/04/2009 3:14:54 PM PST by GovernmentShrinker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: pissant

If Ann got pregnant by accident...... Wait!! Stop right there!

You’re obviously a Democrat. In this life, there is a lot that can happen by accident. However, a woman can’t accidentally get pregnant anymore than a man can accidentally have sex. It takes desire, focus, and effort to get pregnant (and to have sex)!!!

In your words, you give away your belief that getting pregnant is somehow beyond the control of the the ‘victim-mother.’ And, this is exactly the problem that Ann is fighting in her book....Victim mentality!!!


22 posted on 02/04/2009 3:15:08 PM PST by Mustangman (The GOP)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hosepipe

Late?

I beat you by 2 minutes and 13 seconds!

That will teach you to read the article first :)

Cheers,

knewshound


23 posted on 02/04/2009 3:16:23 PM PST by knews_hound (I for one welcome our new Insect overlords!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: GovernmentShrinker

LOL - sshush, you are not supposed to wake up the proletariat.


24 posted on 02/04/2009 3:20:39 PM PST by patton (SPQA - the last, the least and the lost)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: GovernmentShrinker
Do you really expect the now infant children of young widows whose husbands got killed in Iraq, will grow up to have outcomes comparable to those of the average single mother, who is a ghetto-dwelling, high school dropout, 2nd/3rd/4th generation welfare addict with substance abuse problems and a string of long rap-sheeted live-in boyfriends leaving her with a string of babies?
Read the book. Chapter two.

Ann specifically separates "single mothers" from "widows" and "divorced mothers."

25 posted on 02/04/2009 3:30:01 PM PST by RonDog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

Read the book. Chapter two.
That would be, from amazon.com:


26 posted on 02/04/2009 3:32:09 PM PST by RonDog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Mustangman; pissant
If Ann got pregnant by accident......
Here is a quote from Ann's book, as posted on www.randomhouse.com:
Single mothers: Getting pregnant isn’t like catching the flu.

There are volitional acts involved
–someone else explain it to Dennis Kucinich.

By this purposeful act, single mothers cause irreparable harm to other human beings–their own children–as countless studies on the subject make clear.


27 posted on 02/04/2009 3:36:42 PM PST by RonDog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: pissant
Smoking has no causal relationship to crime,...

Well, maybe in a Kennedy Klan type of way after the tobacco stimulus tax kicks in under the Democrats. Drug dealers switching to black market sales of tobacco- safer, less jail time (SO FAR).

28 posted on 02/04/2009 3:44:38 PM PST by Mark (Don't argue with my posts. I typed while under sniper fire..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freedumb2003

The Single Mommy of the Year Award gpoes to the female who had the 8 babies plus 6...


29 posted on 02/04/2009 3:44:48 PM PST by Tennessee Nana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RonDog

Which just proves that it’s not the lack of a father that produces the lousy outcomes. A minority of single-mothers-by-choice have comparable educations and financial resources and general competence to the average widow with young children. Common sense tells us that these two groups of children will have similar outcomes. Let’s see Ann cite a study of college graduate single-mothers-by-choice, that compares their children’s outcomes to the those of the general pool of single mothers. Without that, there’s simply no evidence that single motherhood is a causative factor in lousy outcomes for children.


30 posted on 02/04/2009 3:45:49 PM PST by GovernmentShrinker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: freedumb2003
That was uncalled for

I guess you got my point then.

Ann Coulter is plenty healthy, and a casual observer deciding that she is unhealthy is well...kinda uncalled for.

Perhaps she is glad she is not considered mega hot to those that perceive her to be something she is not.

: > )

Good column, huh?

31 posted on 02/04/2009 3:52:30 PM PST by Syncro (Ti Ming -- Use Librally)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: GovernmentShrinker

“Without that, there’s simply no evidence that single motherhood is a causative factor in lousy outcomes for children.”
______________

I guess I owe Murphy Brown an apoloy.


32 posted on 02/04/2009 3:52:46 PM PST by awake-n-angry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: GovernmentShrinker
Only a minority of single mothers by choice are "accomplished, intelligent" women. There is a good reason why bastardy is the norm rather than the exception in the ghetto.

The yuppie c-nts who couldn't attract a man to knock them up the old fashioned way yet still do IV or get a "favor from a friend" are merely pathetic, not leeches on society.

33 posted on 02/04/2009 3:55:35 PM PST by Clemenza (Red is the Color of Virility, Blue is the Color of Impotence)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: GovernmentShrinker

A widow is not a “single mother”. Those definitions were purposely blurred by the Left to provide cover for irresponsible women.

The psychological difference between being a child whose father died, and a child who never had a father, or one who didn’t care, is a mile wide. It’s the difference between losing a loved one and being abandoned. It’s so obvious it’s a shame it needs to be pointed out.

By the way, you might want to pause and consider before contradicting Ann Coulter when it comes to facts, studies, and statistics. Pick up one of her books and you will find her positions to be very well documented.


34 posted on 02/04/2009 4:00:54 PM PST by Jeff Chandler (PIE FIGHT!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: pissant

College educated single mothers are STILL very likely to be living in poverty.

Which goes to my thesis - poverty, like wealth, is very much a personal choice. A person ends up about as well off in life, as he (or she) thinks he (or she) ought to be.

Poverty is an excellent way to play the “victim” card, and it calls in all the blame that can be thrown around, while the “victim” may softly weep at the harsh vicissitudes forced upon her by an unforgiving and stern code of conduct. But she has been in the forefront of combatting these stereotypes, and for that, she is “brave”.


35 posted on 02/04/2009 4:08:25 PM PST by alloysteel (The term "Islam" does not mean "peace", it means "gaining serenity through surrender".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freedumb2003
Dang! Eat a cheeseburger, woman!

Hey, this woman may be slim but she has a he** of a rack and she is not undernourished. She can climb into my bed anytime she wants! Not that she would want to, mind you, but she would be welcome.

36 posted on 02/04/2009 4:27:04 PM PST by calex59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: GovernmentShrinker
The claim of a “causal relationship” is a crock. Studies that come up with statisticis about the children of single mothers lump them all together, so that the outcomes for children of the majority of single mothers — poor, uneducated, on welfare, even before they had any children — are implied to show a statistical “chance” of the same outcomes for children of any sort of single mother. The studies of children who were raised in mother-only households due the husband-father’s death before or shortly after the child’s birth, show outcomes bearing no resemblance to those in the generalized “single mothers” studies.

If you read the book, Ann makes that exact point. Widows as a group don't make bad decisions. Single mothers as a group are self-destructive idiots who take their children down with them.

If Ann got pregnant by accident ...

The exception that proves the rule. Ann is not likely to "accidentally" (or not) get pregnant. Therefore, because she understands 1)what causes pregnancy 2)how much trouble raising children on your own (or not) is, she will do a much better job of it than your average welfare cow who doesn't.

37 posted on 02/04/2009 4:28:44 PM PST by hopespringseternal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Chandler
By the way, you might want to pause and consider before contradicting Ann Coulter when it comes to facts, studies, and statistics. Pick up one of her books and you will find her positions to be very well documented.

Absolutely right, Guilty would be an excellent example and has all the statistics to back up the claims being made in this article.

38 posted on 02/04/2009 4:28:57 PM PST by calex59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: GovernmentShrinker
If Ann got pregnant by accident and ended up having the baby and raising it by herself, there is virtually zero chance that the child would grow up to exhibit “criminal behavior, substance abuse, juvenile delinquency, sexual victimization and almost every other social disorder.” Eating disorder would be much more likely . . .

Do you know why that is? Because Ann would never get pregnant "accidentally". She is talking about women who choose to be single mothers for the most part. Read her book, Guilty, and then make you idiotic assertion.

39 posted on 02/04/2009 4:32:24 PM PST by calex59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: calex59

“Hey, this woman may be slim but she has a he** of a rack and she is not undernourished. She can climb into my bed anytime she wants! Not that she would want to, mind you, but she would be welcome.”

She’s single. It could happen :)


40 posted on 02/04/2009 4:34:10 PM PST by freedumb2003 (Communism comes to America: 1/20/2009. Keep your powder dry, folks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-75 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson