Darwinism, Medical Progress, and Eugenics

Inbred Science ^ | 1912 | Karl Pearson

[Ethan Clive Osgoode]

Go here for more loony evolutionist material: Inbred Science.

[Ethan Clive Osgoode]

Darwinism versus the Medical Profession ping.

[demshateGod]

I’d greatly appreciate being added to your ping list.

The fact the US medical professionals are partially to totally given over to eugenic philosophy is evident in every visit to the doctor I make and every story, whether anecdotal or written, I hear/read.

[steve-b]

The usual fallacy of confusing “is” with “ought”. That form of illogic is very common among liberals; you ought to try posting this on DU where it would be better received.

[chuck_the_tv_out]

evolutionism is a religion. it shoudl not be funded by the state.

ANY honest evolutionist will admit that it is based on a belief in things that they TOTALLY don’t know.

a REALLY honest evolutionist will say that they only believe in that preposterous theory because they don’t want to consider the alternative.

[Alamo-Girl]

Thanks for the ping!

[wendy1946]

To find anything comparable to the wars of the last century in history books you have to go straight back to Chengis Khan. Those wars and the ideologies which spawned them absolutely depend on the darwinist notion of viewing your fellow man as a meat byproduct of random events, rather than as fellow children of God.

[Edizzl79]

This question may not be related to the article, but this is something that’s been on my mind recently and thought this would be a good venue to ask. Is darwinism related to atheism? I have an associate that’s turning into a friend, that considers himself a conservative, but sports the darwin fish on his car. His wife prides a framed picture of our hometown steelers kneeling in prayer on his tv, and yet does not do prayer. Atheists and darwin people have me confused. If you believed in the big bang and evolution, why would you celebrate xmas or easter? I mean I don’t celebrate Kwanzaa for good reason!

[MrB]

If you want to see a lib’s head explode,

assert this:

“Just because it sounds like a good idea doesn’t mean that the government has the authority to do it.”

[MrB]

No “conservatism” or even “inalienable rights” without a Creator.

If rights come from an institution of Man, they can be removed by another institution of Man.

If they come from the Creator, they can only be removed by the Creator.

[chuck_the_tv_out]

"the darwin fish"

this?


that's supposed to be a christian symbol. i think it was originally a sort of joined-up cross, but gradually became a fish.

I'd prefer to show a real cross personally, but the people who have it seem to mean well.

But yeah darwinism is inextricably linked with atheism

[ecomcon]

Frightening in it’s matter-of-fact hubris. So many rabbit trails of thought leading eventually to the totalitarianism of the atheist left. National Socialism and Communism. The government elites will make all decisions. Command and control.

[Ethan Clive Osgoode]

Is darwinism related to atheism?

Of course. Read these by Darwin Medalist Ernst Haeckel:

The Non-Miraculous History of Creation

Science and Christianity

[Ethan Clive Osgoode]

So many rabbit trails of thought leading eventually to the totalitarianism of the atheist left.

On that note, please examine this post too:

Socialism and Darwinism

[Zionist Conspirator]

Thank you for the ping, and for all that you are doing!

[js1138]

You know what? If “Darwinists” ate babies for lunch, evolution would still be a fact.

[GodGunsGuts]

Save for later ping.

PS Excellent find!

[DoctorMichael]

"Inbred Science".

Indeed, an apt name for this.

[count-your-change]

“Our social instincts, our common humanity enforce upon us the conception that each person born has the right to live, yet this right essentially connotes a suspension of the full intensity of natural selection. Darwinism and medical progress are opposed forces, and we shall gain nothing by screening that fact, or, in opposition to ample evidence, asserting that Darwinism has no application to civilised man. [10]”

Pearson was upfront enough with his views: Darwinism is being frustrated by compassion and efforts to keep the “unfit” alive. Of course he always would see himself in the “fit” side of the scales when lives were weighed.

But his views also form the core philosophy of the
ecology/environmentalist movement leaders like Arne Naess (recently died) who would contemplate the reduction of earth's population by 2/3 to fulfill their dreams.

Pearson is alive and well and has many children.

[usmom]

The fact the US medical professionals are partially to totally given over to eugenic philosophy is evident in every visit to the doctor I make and every story, whether anecdotal or written, I hear/read.

I agree with you wholeheartedly. I have worked in the medical profession for 20 years and have much experience in working with/around doctors and the medical system in general. With each passing year, my fear and distrust of them grows to the point that I have determined that the best way to stay healthy is to avoid them at all costs, which I have done quite successfully. There are good ones out there, but they are few and far between, and as a rule, people would be well advised to limit their contact with conventional medicine as much as possible. My blood runs cold when I hear talk of socialized medicine. Doctors+ government= BAD NEWS.