DHC-2, if you wish to use it, you are more than welcome, but any future T-Shirts, bumper stickers, movie or book sales with the logo in it or on it, will have to go through my lawyer's infamous law firm, Dewey, Cheetum & Howe.
Posted on 01/31/2009 12:29:20 AM PST by Red Steel
Doug
Hey, a little respect, after all he is PRES__ENT!
(Darn I do like that tagline).
“We” are capable of multi-tasking—it’s no problem at all. Anytime I here “drop the suits,” “no merit,” “let’s move on” or anything of that sort I know it’s not a genuine constitutionalist talking but rather someone who is here to demoralize and sow discord.
Hey, a little respect, after all he is PRES__ENT!
(Darn I do like that tagline).
***I like presents for my birthday, Christmas, etc. He’s like a “white elephant” gift. Or is it a “black elephant” gift? Whatever...
Trolling is as trolling does. People who signed up after the election and haunt eligibilty threads when they say the issue is silly are extremely suspicious.
I don’t know about anyone else but I don’t seek out threads dealing with matters that I don’t take seriously. These guys show up on eligibilty threads as if somebody shot them out of a cannon.
Haven’t you ever run across people that can’t walk and chew gum at the same time? Seems like there are some of those here.
Good one.
He is just "resident Obama"!!!
Good point.
... (a) Birth certificates registered one year or more after the date of birth, and certificates which have been altered after being filed with the department of health, shall contain the date of the late filing ...
It doesn't say anything about marking the short form certification (Obamas' COLB) that's issued in lieu of any of the 3 types of certificates that can be on file.
In any case, according to Obama's COLB, his birth certificate was filed on August 8th, 1961, when he was only 4 days old, not more than a year late.
I recollect a fellow named Al Capone who thought charging a murderer for tax evasion was a joke.
I'm not saying that Obama does not have a problem with his birth certificate that he is trying to hide. I'm saying that "Cris Ericson", the author of this piece, has not discovered anything useful in this investigation, and the feature of Obama's COLB she focuses on to make her case is just something that is on every COLB.
All that it takes is just one Judge to subpoena Obama’s original birth certificate, enforce the subpoena and then compare documents. That will blow this case wide open!!
“and certificates which have been altered after being filed with the department of health, shall contain the date of the late filing ..”
So, then the fact that it says “filed” on the COLB, and the fact that it wasn’t a over a year, but 4 days, means that it has been altered? That’s pretty conclusive isn’t it? Or am I missing something...
Is it possible to change the location of birth I wonder. That’d be some alteration...Oops sorry, I got my place of birth wrong, it was actually another country.
I'd really like to see that. Unfortunately none of the cases filed so far has been sufficiently well-composed to impress a judge to issue a subpoena for the original BC. And Ms. Ericson doesn't even have a case.
DHC-2, if you wish to use it, you are more than welcome, but any future T-Shirts, bumper stickers, movie or book sales with the logo in it or on it, will have to go through my lawyer's infamous law firm, Dewey, Cheetum & Howe.
You're missing something. It says "filed" because they all say "filed". The fact that the date is 4 days after birth rather than a year is not evidence of alteration; it is evidence that Ms. Ericson's claim that Obama's certificate was filed over a year late is just totally wrong.
That’s EXACTLY the DNC’s position.
Actually, no, they don’t all say “filed”:
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3084/2601778875_496cabb303_o.jpg
says “accepted”...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
