HR 45 Firearm Licensing and Record of Sale Act of 2009

thomas.loc.gov ^ | effective bill Jan 6th 2009 | corrupt progressives liberalsout to ruin our country

[Dubya-M-DeesWent2SyriaStupid!]

Brought to you by the Obama Chicago machine. Are you ready for the House Bill titled 'HR 45, Blair Holt Licensing and Record Act of 2009'.

It will make it illegal to own a firearm unless it is registered with the database in Washington D.C. As a gun owner you will have to be finger printed, you will be required to provide your DL#, SS#, you must maintain a valid address at all times, submit to mental amd physical health records being put on file, you will also be required to file any address changes and you must report any ownership changes even if private sale.

Each update will cost $25 and if you fail to comply you will lose your right to own firearms and be subject to criminal penalties.

This bill and its language mirror almost completely one defeated last year in the House of Representatives by soon to be Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel. Will we the citizenry be as lucky this time?

We cannot let them pass this bill!

Click Here HR 45 Firearm Licensing and Record of Sale Act of 2009

This could be us.England Gun Ban Update

[familyop]

"Alot of LEOs are ex-military, lest you forget."

...were, in the past. Now prior combat specialty servicemen are not very well liked at all in at all in police circles. Nor are married cops. ...been there and tried that, and The Police Chief's Association has come out quite a few times in favor of firearms control laws.

But the bill won't go anywhere.

[BAW]

No wonder guns are flying off the shelves...

Time to stock up on ammo too.

[Dr.Zoidberg]

Interesting, would you have your police officers making decisions on which laws are constitutional and which are not?

Under normal circumstances no, but on the subject of this thread, I would hope (although I don't really expect anything from law enforcement personnel but doing what keeps their retirement intact.) that they would stand with citizens who reject a law clearly in conflict with the second amendment.

[waterhill]

I did not say all as well, and I am not putting faith in those sworn to uphold any laws. I was merely stating that alot of badges will get tossed before the citizenry is immosed upon in a draconian manner.

[atomic_dog]

Dear Comrade,

I hate to be the bearer of bad news but you are too late. That horse has left the barn. We look forward to meeting your champions on the field of honor.

[BobbyT]

Try again. Your SKS won’t even get the chance to have its number of evil ergonomic attachments assessed; it’ll be listed by name.

If you don’t believe me come visit Hussein’s own Crook County. They took the federal ban and “enhanced” it by adding every gun they could think of by name. The SKS makes the list.

They also replaced the “more than two of the following features” with “ONE or more” to make sure they captured every semi possible.

[ExTexasRedhead]

Where’s a Conservative Leader for our opposition to the Socialists taking over our country? The Goebbel’s MSM propaganda machine would like to make it look like the Liberal God has massive support. Wrong. Half this country didn’t vote for this Chicago hack. Where’s the FBI investigation of the massive voter fraud and illegal contributions from the Middle Eastern countries? Anyone have answers???

[waterhill]

immosed=imposed

[Dr.Zoidberg]

I certainly hope you are right.

[Dubya-M-DeesWent2SyriaStupid!]

Obama will have everyone for cocktails and they will try to pass it.

[blackbart.223]

"Anyone have answers???"

There are a lot of people who shouldn't vote. My best answer.

[1COUNTER-MORTER-68]

That magazine looks kind of,,,mmmmm,,,er,,,well,,,SHORT!;0)

[Jet Jaguar]

agreed.

[chuckles]

....."Why can’t Congressmen be sued or impeached for proposing unconstitutional laws?".....

They CAN! All you have to do is find a majority with cajones. That's impossible.

I even had a dream awhile back about making a test case and taking it all the way to the SCOTUS. I made them show me chapter and verse in the Constitution that allowed the law they passed( a spending bill about buying something we didn't need). Of course the only thing in the Constitution that says anything vague is it must be for the "general welfare". Everything else is pretty specific. Building a water park in FLA doesn't qualify for "the general welfare". Nevada doesn't want it, I asked.

[BonRad]

dot gov site(s) on this VERY sluggish-
no doubt 10,000’s getting on even at this late hour

[atomic_dog]

That magazine looks kind of,,,mmmmm,,,er,,,well,,,SHORT!;0)

You can't see it in that photo but the muzzle brake (it's *NOT* a flash hider) looks kind of funny too. They are all that my Masters in Sacramento allow me to own. Thankfully they did not limit the number of magazines I can have. Fortunately I have business interests in other states where I can store stuff ......

[stefanbatory]

i will be borrowing your picture...:)

[budwiesest]

Have the Bonnie Blue ready for when the first state leaves.

From Wiki:
The flag is still used to represent the South, and for some[who?] is a way of representing favor for the doctrine of states' rights.[citation needed] Since the flag pre-dates the Civil War and is not associated with slavery, it is considered to be a less-offensive alternative to the Confederate Battle Flag.[citation needed] However there is still stigma against the flag as some view it as a symbol of the South during when slavery was commonplace, and it's unofficial use during the Civil War by the Confederacy still makes it a troublesome flag for African Americans.

Also from Wiki:
In the 1936 novel by Margaret Mitchell and the 1939 film Gone with the Wind, Rhett Butler decides to call his newborn daughter "Bonnie Blue Butler" when Melanie Wilkes remarks that her eyes are "as blue as the Bonnie Blue Flag."[2]

(me)In the Contract With America, (the original, not Newt's) arms, and the respect governments must abide them, is an intregal part. To think a member of the U.S. House of Representatives could present such a bill is beyond disgusting. That other members of the house haven't barred this member for such anti-American behavior is unsettling in the least.

[LegendHasIt]

[familyop]

"Time to stock up on ammo too."

Until now, I've said that such stockpiling was hysterical and bad for us. But in answer to former Black Panther and Representative Bobby Rush's sponsorship of that anti-American, unconstitutional bill, stockpiling is a good way to make the proper statement. That politician must be more than a little mentally slow or neglectful about political and social consequences.

Just be safe. Lock it up in a proper cool, dry, dark place, so that it will keep for a long time.