Skip to comments.
Is Pelosi Panicking? Leaked Memo Lashes Out at Republicans
Human Events ^
| 29 January 09
| Connie Hair
Posted on 01/29/2009 7:57:16 AM PST by Clinton's a liar
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120 ... 321-335 next last
To: TV Dinners
...as in “anal leakage” Olestra???
81
posted on
01/29/2009 8:20:47 AM PST
by
Obadiah
(The orgasm has replaced the cross as the focus of longing and fulfillment.)
To: EternalVigilance
Wow. Not a single economist left who isn't a Marxist redistributionist. Who'da thunk it? Reminds me of the last time I watch CBS News with Dan Rather (probably sometime in the late 80's). He made the statement "All Economists agree that Reagonomics does not work."
I saw no evidence that he had polled all economists in the US, let alone the world, therefore he was lying. But never again in my house.
82
posted on
01/29/2009 8:20:48 AM PST
by
w1andsodidwe
(Jimmy Carter(the Godfather of Terror) allowed radical Islam to get a foothold in Iran.)
To: Clinton's a liar
I love this part:
* The national debt has almost doubled in the last eight years; the debt borrowed from foreign countries has tripled.
Their bill will add almost a trillion dollars directly onto the national debt in 1 jump, and they're saying GWB was irresponsible?
And which foreign investors, I wonder, are going to buy this debt? What I'm seeing & reading indicates that China is starting it's own national re-investment program. Who else is going to have that kinda bailout cash?
83
posted on
01/29/2009 8:21:13 AM PST
by
Tallguy
("The sh- t's chess, it ain't checkers!" -- Alonzo (Denzel Washington) in "Training Day")
To: ziravan
"Try reading the Constitution, and then, for good measure, the Federalist Papers."Throw in Adam Smith's Wealth of Nations and the Anti-Federalist Papers for good measure.
To: Clinton's a liar
Nancy Pelosi needs to check her history. It was the Republicans that forced Clinton to sign legislation to balance budget, cut Welfare, create jobs in the 1990’s. This and lower taxes created the budget surplus, not Congress. When will these idiots learn that DC is not the center of the universe and their jobs exist at the will of the people of this nation. The only thing this stimulus does is to pay off their special interest groups for support. It does nothing to create meaningful jobs. If you look at the spending closely most of goes back to government for their infrastructure. They don't give a S**t about the American citizen as long as they maintain their hold on power. Makes me sick!
85
posted on
01/29/2009 8:22:05 AM PST
by
reader25
To: prismsinc
A hidden story here is that this vote was 14 votes away from failing. Thats almost as many Dems that voted against it. Amazing! I heard on the radio this morning that some, if not all of the Dems voted against it because it wasn't aggressive enough in the government spending Dept. In other words it wasn't big enough, or liberal enough. I am not sure that they should be congratulated for doing the right thing for the wrong reasons.
86
posted on
01/29/2009 8:22:34 AM PST
by
Turbo Pig
(...to close with and destroy the enemy...)
To: Clinton's a liar
Once again this week, as another Democratic President and Democratic Congress worked to address historic deficits and recession brought on by Republican mismanagement of the economy, not a single Republican voted for the legislation. There's a pattern here of Republican economic mismanagement and Democrats stepping up to do what's needed for the good of the country while Republicans acted in a partisan and irresponsible manner.
If the Republican fail to get ahead of this PR nightmare, they will end up being the losers anyway.
87
posted on
01/29/2009 8:23:34 AM PST
by
TomGuy
To: Clinton's a liar
What’s the outlook for Repub support for Porkulus in the Senate?
To: Turbo Pig
MSM spin The nay Dems were “Blue-Dog”
89
posted on
01/29/2009 8:24:13 AM PST
by
prismsinc
(A.K.A. "The Terminator"!)
To: Einigkeit_Recht_Freiheit
There is a reason that the very first entry course to the study of economics - “ECON-101”, or the equivalent - is Macro Economics, which is entirely Keynesian. It considers spending by government and in the private sector to be completely equal in effect, and further, because it is based on aggregate measurements, it absolutely fails to consider the motivations and incentives of individuals and firms that make up those aggregates.
MacroEcon might be a reasonable place to start - after all, it does begin the process of analytical modeling using equations and graphs, which leads to an easier grasp of the data. But it is a TERRIBLE place to stop, because it offers only a false confidence in its superficial explanation of the effects of various economic policies.
90
posted on
01/29/2009 8:24:50 AM PST
by
MainFrame65
(The US Senate: World's greatest PREVARICATIVE body!.)
To: MrB
“If they had the power, there is no doubt in my mind that they would implement ‘the final solution’ for ‘the Republican problem’.”
What makes you think they won’t have the power? The Germans in 1933 couldn’t have imagined what was to come either.
To: jla
"at the exact time when economists of every ideological stripe agree that government investments are the only way to get our economy moving again and make us competitive for the long term."
She's either a pathological liar or lives in a very well sealed vacuum.
Hard to tell which, but she's definetly wrong:
Economists Slam Barack Obama's Stimulus Package (Full Page Ad!)
92
posted on
01/29/2009 8:25:54 AM PST
by
EdReform
(The right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed *NRA*JPFO*SAF*GOA*SAS*CCRKBA)
To: Clinton's a liar
93
posted on
01/29/2009 8:26:13 AM PST
by
2nd amendment mama
( www.2asisters.org | Self defense is a basic human right!)
To: KansasGirl
And those are her good points. Frankly, we should start ridiculing people who elect folks like Pelosi and Franks.
94
posted on
01/29/2009 8:26:15 AM PST
by
brytlea
(You can fool enough of the people enough of the time.)
To: Clinton's a liar
95
posted on
01/29/2009 8:26:22 AM PST
by
redreno
To: prismsinc
96
posted on
01/29/2009 8:27:08 AM PST
by
tgusa
(Gun control: deep breath, sight alignment, squeeze the trigger ....)
To: EternalVigilance
Wow. Not a single economist left who isn't a Marxist redistributionist. Who'da thunk it? Not even I :)
97
posted on
01/29/2009 8:27:13 AM PST
by
whodathunkit
(Shrugging as I leave for the Gulch)
To: whodathunkit
98
posted on
01/29/2009 8:27:46 AM PST
by
EternalVigilance
(God is watching and listening.)(The Personhood Imperative: www.BanAbortionNOW.com)
To: Clinton's a liar
Why would you need to repeat talking points in an internal memo? Do they normally use campaign literature for inter-office communication?
To: tgusa
Worth noting the so called ‘blue dog democrats’ voted with Pelosi almost 100% of the time in the last congress.
That makes them a ‘media myth’ in my opinion.
100
posted on
01/29/2009 8:29:32 AM PST
by
Badeye
(There are no 'great moments' in Moderate Political History. Only losses.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120 ... 321-335 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson