Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

House Republicans Hold Firm (On Stimulus spending. Finally, a party worth supporting)
Powerline ^ | Jan 28,2009 | John Hindraker

Posted on 01/28/2009 7:36:53 PM PST by SeekAndFind

Congratulations to the House Republicans: all 177 voted against the Democrats' pork-fest bill. Eleven Democrats joined the Republicans in rejecting Nancy Pelosi's fiscal insanity, which, the Congressional Budget Office confirmed yesterday, would actually cost $1.1 trillion.

The Republicans put together their own stimulus package; they say that, using Christina Romer's methodology--she will be the Chairman of Obama's Council of Economic Advisers--their program will create 6.2 million jobs.

Whether that's right or not, the Republicans' plan, unlike the Democrats', was actually geared to job creation. Here are a few highlights. The Republican proposal would:

* Reduce the lowest individual tax rates from 15 percent to 10 percent and from 10 percent to five percent.

* Allow small businesses a tax deduction up to 20 percent of income.

* Finance a $7,500 credit for home-buyers who put down at least 5 percent.

* Expand Net Operating Loss carryback rules to give companies that have been profitable in the past but are now losing money prompt infusions of cash.

* Provide an above-the-line tax deduction for private health insurance to equalize tax treatment between those who have employer-sponsored health plans and those who don't.

For the Republicans, this vote is an important first step toward reclaiming the mantle of small(er) government and fiscal responsibility.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Editorial; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 111th; bho44; bhostimulus; gop; gophousetakeover2010; hindraker; pork
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last
Now it remains to be seen how the GOP Senators will vote. If they all vote like the Lower House did, the GOP just might have hope after all.
1 posted on 01/28/2009 7:36:53 PM PST by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
I wouldn't count on the Senate GOP to be as bold in opposing this bailout pork-laden spend-fest. You got a lot of good GOPers like DeMint, Bunning, Inhofe, etc. But then you also have McCain, Graham, Snowe, Specter, and their ilk. I'm predicting it passes the Senate tomorrow with something like a 75-25 vote.
2 posted on 01/28/2009 7:39:41 PM PST by Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus (Nihil utile nisi quod honestum - Marcus Tullius Cicero)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Encouraging developments. Stay away from these waves of disastrous legislation.


3 posted on 01/28/2009 7:40:31 PM PST by allmost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: allmost

Maybe they are actually listening to the common sense of Rush. Why would any Republican put their name on this failure?


4 posted on 01/28/2009 7:42:25 PM PST by dandiegirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Thank you for the editorial in the headline. 100% correct. Called my R congresscritter today and thanked him and the caucus.


5 posted on 01/28/2009 7:43:30 PM PST by Uncle Miltie (Dissent is Patriotic. Palin 2012!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

You mean a lot of the same RINO’s who actually set these socialists bailouts in motion by giving the democrats cover with the first bailout. They helped open a Pandora;s box, in which this country may never recover.

Nice that there are now anti bailouts. Would have been better to never help open this pandora’s box in the first place.


6 posted on 01/28/2009 7:43:36 PM PST by tennmountainman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

The democrats and their media lapdogs will lambaste the GOP for going along with the Wall Street bailout months ago, and now opposing the “main street bailout” - 10 bucks language of just this sort will appear all over the MSM. Honestly, they will have a point - it’s an unforgivable inconsistency - yet things will get better. They already have less than two years to set themselves up as Zero’s opposition, they better get moving if they expect to have any hope of making gains in the midterm elections.


7 posted on 01/28/2009 7:44:56 PM PST by eclecticEel (The liberal's sense of compassion begins and ends with their own person.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Better hold until the after conference finally vote.
8 posted on 01/28/2009 7:45:49 PM PST by org.whodat (Conservatives don't vote for Bailouts for Super-Rich Bankers! Republicans do!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #9 Removed by Moderator

To: SeekAndFind

Who are the 11 Democrats who voted “no” on this monstrosity ?


10 posted on 01/28/2009 7:46:48 PM PST by fieldmarshaldj (~"This is what happens when you find a stranger in the Alps !"~~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: eclecticEel

Already happening - R’s are now “just being partisan” when America wants them to work with the “popular president” they elected.


11 posted on 01/28/2009 7:48:07 PM PST by anniegetyourgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

Comment #12 Removed by Moderator

To: Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus

“I wouldn’t count on the Senate GOP to be as bold in opposing this bailout pork-laden spend-fest.”

It’s less a stimulus than a pork-laden spend-fest for pet Democratic causes and industries. Republicans only vote for pork-laden bills that support their own causes and industries.

The good news is the money, the debt, isn’t to be incurred in a year, unlike the bailout money.

Bad news is it is a grabbag of money for the Chicago Crew to dole out.

What happened is the Democrats followed Bush’s example on “crisis mongering” to get a bill quickly through, and adopted the rubric “stimulus” to hide it further.


13 posted on 01/28/2009 7:48:10 PM PST by Shermy ("The whole world has financed the United States, ...they have a reciprocal debt with the planet.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Now the Republicans should sponsor a bill. Total expenditure $1.00 just to make it legal. Stimulus for the president salary to reverse the ‘Obama Law of Deminishing Returns.’


14 posted on 01/28/2009 7:48:49 PM PST by Fitzy_888 ("ownership society")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tennmountainman

Well said....... should have never voted for any of this to begin with!

This bill economically rapes our children for very questionable benefit and I hope the RINO’s in the Senate shock us and oppose it.


15 posted on 01/28/2009 7:49:07 PM PST by volunbeer (Dear heaven.... we really need President Reagan again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Good post on how Rush hammering that Congressman sorts of help get the troops to get focused.

The GOP needs to show a chart of the S&P 500 since June 2008 when O wond the nomination. October when McCain was down in the polls and day after election.

The freepin truth is the economy has been destroyed because Americans with money are terrified of him and OBAMA TANKED THE ECONOMY - ZERO confidence in him

Wake up GOP and get the word out.


16 posted on 01/28/2009 7:51:29 PM PST by Frantzie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus
I wouldn't count on the Senate GOP to be as bold in opposing this bailout pork-laden spend-fest.

If they're wise, they would all VOTE AS ONE AGAINST the stimulus package. What advantage do they have in co-owning a sure to be pork laden bill that does virtually nothing for the economy ?

They don't have the numbers to overturn the Dems anyway, so, might as well make them OWN this mistake and tell their country later -- I TOLD YOU SO -- when it doesn't work ( as it surely won't).
17 posted on 01/28/2009 7:53:05 PM PST by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: tennmountainman
Would have been better to never help open this pandora’s box in the first place.

Better late than never. And when you're AGAINST SOMETHING, be sure to propose something CONSTRUCTIVE as a better alternative to what's out there. You can't simply be against something. The people also want to know what you are FOR.
18 posted on 01/28/2009 7:54:50 PM PST by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj

Does anyone know who were the eleven Democrats?
Boyd (FL)
Bright (AL)
Cooper (TN)
Ellsworth (IN)
Griffith (AL)
Kanjorski (PA)
Kratovil (MD)
Minnick (ID)
Peterson (MN)
Shuler (NC)
Taylor (MS)


19 posted on 01/28/2009 7:55:39 PM PST by The Chief (I'm a Volunteer Fire Fighter!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: thereisno
republicans are a joke. They are history and will now disappear.

Well, I'll say that this unified vote against a VERY BAD BILL tells me that there is a glimmer of hope.
20 posted on 01/28/2009 7:55:57 PM PST by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson