Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Child care loopholes lead to easy money: Sisters get $540k from state for watching each other's kids
jsonline.com ^ | January 25, 2009 | Raquel Rutledge

Posted on 01/28/2009 7:03:33 PM PST by lowbridge

The two-story house on 17th St. looks typical of the working-class homes on Racine's west side. Three bedrooms, one bath. Assessed by the city at $122,000.

Yet inside, a young woman has tapped into a home-based money-making operation that netted her and her three sisters more than half a million in taxpayer dollars since 2006.

And they did it with the blessing of the state.

All four had been in-home child-care providers. Collectively they have 17 children. For years, the government has paid them to stay home and care for each other's children.

Nothing illegal about it under the rules of Wisconsin Shares, the decade-old child-care assistance program designed alongside Wisconsin's welfare-to-work program.

"It's a loophole," said Laurice Lincoln, administrative coordinator for child care with the Milwaukee County Department of Health and Human Services. "Do we have concerns about it? Yes, it can be a problem. But if it's allowed, it's allowed. We really can't dispute it."

The Journal Sentinel spent four months investigating the $340 million taxpayer-supported program and uncovered an array of costly problems - including fraud. But the investigation also revealed a system rife with lax regulations that have paved the way for abuse by parents and providers.

Consider:

• Sisters or other relatives can stay home, swap kids and receive taxpayer dollars. The four Racine sisters took in as much as $540,000 in taxpayer dollars in less than three years, mostly to watch each other's kids.

• Rules allow parents to be employed by child-care providers and enroll their children at the same place. At some centers, children of employees make up the majority of kids in day care. In one Milwaukee location, an employer and parents are accused of teaming up to bilk the system out of more than $360,000.

(Excerpt) Read more at jsonline.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; US: Wisconsin
KEYWORDS: handouts; obamaworld; welfare; wisconsin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-49 next last

1 posted on 01/28/2009 7:03:33 PM PST by lowbridge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: lowbridge

I love government.


2 posted on 01/28/2009 7:06:27 PM PST by Psycho_Bunny (ALSO SPRACH ZEROTHUSTRA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lowbridge

Just think of how much creative energy will be expended by folks trying to cash in on the stimulus bill boondoggle....


3 posted on 01/28/2009 7:06:46 PM PST by anniegetyourgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lowbridge

Why the hell not?

We’re bailing out everybody else and his dog.

Go for it!


4 posted on 01/28/2009 7:07:50 PM PST by Lorianne (People who do not own their homes outright are mortgage-owners, not homeowners.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lowbridge

The govt pays people to babysit? What’s the hourly rate?


5 posted on 01/28/2009 7:08:33 PM PST by 668 - Neighbor of the Beast (That's American Revolution II, overdue.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lowbridge

The correct model to follow is the farm subsidy model. The government should pay me for NOT watching anybody’s kids.


6 posted on 01/28/2009 7:10:12 PM PST by ClearCase_guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

damn im a realtor i think i just found my new proffesion! sign me up!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


7 posted on 01/28/2009 7:11:42 PM PST by remaxagnt (`)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: lowbridge

Reparations, baby.


8 posted on 01/28/2009 7:12:52 PM PST by Thrownatbirth (.....Iraq Invasion fan since '91.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lowbridge

Between the 4 sisters they have 17 children.....


9 posted on 01/28/2009 7:13:27 PM PST by goodnesswins (Tell the truth - GOEBBELIZATION (propaganda) is what many voters suffer from.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 668 - Neighbor of the Beast
Well, babysitting is a part time job. so lets go with 4 hours a day, 5 days a week. 20 hours a week. About 1000 hours a year. (2 weeks vacation).

They've been doing this for 3 years. 3000 hours.

540 thousand dollars divided by 3000 hours, that comes to 180 dollars an hour. And assuming it was 8 hours a day (6000 hours), then that comes to 90 dollars an hour.

10 posted on 01/28/2009 7:14:30 PM PST by lowbridge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: lowbridge
Atlas Puked....
11 posted on 01/28/2009 7:14:50 PM PST by Chode (American Hedonist -)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lowbridge

That seems a bit extravagant, unless the baby is an adult with naughty ideas.


12 posted on 01/28/2009 7:17:08 PM PST by 668 - Neighbor of the Beast (That's American Revolution II, overdue.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: lowbridge

Started in 2006, so two years.


13 posted on 01/28/2009 7:18:46 PM PST by listenhillary (Rahm Emmanuel slip - A crisis is a terrible thing to waste.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: 668 - Neighbor of the Beast

$5.51 per hour for 17 children for 40 hours a week for 3 years which totalled $540,000. But I’m no math genius.


14 posted on 01/28/2009 7:19:31 PM PST by skr (May God confound the enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Psycho_Bunny
Yep, I would say that 40 acres and a mule or a chicken in every pot was kicked into high gear sometime back. So why do we need the stimulus package?
15 posted on 01/28/2009 7:20:26 PM PST by freekitty (Give me back my conservative vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: skr

Oops, forgot, per child.


16 posted on 01/28/2009 7:21:17 PM PST by skr (May God confound the enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: freekitty

Maybe these voters better think about it. This is a much better deal than they would be getting in a stimulus package.


17 posted on 01/28/2009 7:21:39 PM PST by freekitty (Give me back my conservative vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: 668 - Neighbor of the Beast

Easy money...Thorazine and Play Station 2’s make it easy money!!!


18 posted on 01/28/2009 7:22:50 PM PST by RSmithOpt (Liberalism: Highway to Hell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: lowbridge

The question is who in the program told these people how to do this!! Because they are two stupid to figure it out on their own!!


19 posted on 01/28/2009 7:26:59 PM PST by org.whodat (Conservatives don't vote for Bailouts for Super-Rich Bankers! Republicans do!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lowbridge
What can I get for watching the traffic go by? That should be worth something. I'll even settle for a one time bailout. I'll donate half of what I get to my congressman's re election campaign. That should get his support. Call it a stimulus if that helps
20 posted on 01/28/2009 7:27:35 PM PST by paul51 (11 September 2001 - Never forget (July 4, 2009 see you there))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-49 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson