Posted on 01/28/2009 3:07:17 PM PST by PJ-Comix
Pity todays trust funders.
Their bright futures of easy money and endless leisure went up in smoke with the stock markets and financial crisis. They have seen their future Hamptons homes and Aspen villas crash in value, their charitable foundations get poorer and their bling budgets drastically curtailed. Some may not even get to replace their Bentleys this year.
Then there is the group we might call Bernies Kidsthe economically orphaned trust funders whose parents lost money in Mr. Madoffs fraud. We have read about dozens of foundations that lost millions of dollars in that alleged Ponzi scheme, and while most were created for philanthropy, some are vehicles for passing money from parents to their children.
(Excerpt) Read more at blogs.wsj.com ...
What’s up with that DUmmie who gave 200 grand to Obama and, as a result, couldn’t pay for his mortgage and was foreclosed upon?
I remember watching Dobie Gillis while I did my homework.
Looking for the Williamsburg hipster douchebag trustafarians to decamp from their $3,000 a month Brooklyn tenements...
Did one of them actually do that? Is it in the DU funnies?
Don’t be too surprised to see TARP funds allocated to bail out the richie rich who got “duped” by Madoff. Have already heard the proposals coming out of the mouths of our dear leaders.
Can I get the bonus? The G stands for Walter
His parrents must have gone to publik screwl
I do have my favorite charities (BSA, Salvation Army and Feed The Children) but I have earned every cent entrusted to me. There is no celebrity status for me or my brothers. We work and will save and spend as we damn well please. There are more "trust fund babies" like myself than the likes of Paris and Company.
The G stood for Gwalter. But the G is silent.
Your type (work hard and continue the family business) is what we need more of. I certainly beleive that there are more of you out there.
I still stand behind my statement. Most trust funds are set up for the sole purpose of passing the money down the line and side-stepping the IRS, not for philanthropy. Not that there is anything wrong with that, as the people who set them up, certainly have earned the money to do so, and they should be able to keep it. The ones I have a hard time with are like Buffet. He sets his up, then works to make it harder for the rest of us to do so.
My original comment wasn't to be taken as a stab at anyone, just correcting why they are put in place.
but but what of his fiance?
I assume he was marrying a female? She thought she had a trust fund slob who now might become a blue collar slob?? She will be SSSoooo disappointed
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.