Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Netanyahu: Obama Will Try to Internationalize Jerusalem Sites
Arutz Sheva ^ | 1-28-09 | Hana Levi Julian

Posted on 01/28/2009 8:39:17 AM PST by SJackson

(IsraelNN.com) Likud party chairman and Knesset Opposition leader MK Binyamin Netanyahu warned at the Jerusalem Conference Wednesday that the Obama administration and leftist Israeli politicians will try to internationalize holy sites in Jerusalem -- and he vowed to fight the move.

Netanyahu speech starts at 1:00 minute mark in video below.

MK Binyamin "Bibi" Netanyahu Arutz 7 Video

00:00 Embed Video - Copy code to embed video in HTML document

Email readers: click here to watch Netanyahu speech.

Netanyahu told the audience, “Some politicians are trying to blur the importance of the Temple Mount to the Jewish People by referring to it as the ‘Holy Basin.’ We, as Jews, know who built the Temple Mount.”

The term “Holy Basin” refers to the area of the Temple Mount, the Mount of Olives, Mount Zion and a variety of Christian holy sites which the administration of former U.S. President Bill Clinton recommended be administered under a “special regime.”

This raises the issue of who would administer the Temple Mount, since at present the Wakf Islamic Authority controls the site, albeit under Israeli sovereignty. Moreover, the Arab neighborhoods surrounding the Temple Mount, home to tens of thousands of Israeli Arab residents, are also a part of greater Jerusalem, and thereby fall into the same discussion.

Former prime minister Netanyahu, who will likely return to his old leadership role after the February 10 Israel elections, repeatedly emphasized the Likud’s loyalty to the concept of a united Jerusalem.

“We have demonstrated in the past, and will continue to demonstrate our commitment to a complete, undivided Jerusalem,” Netanyahu assured a packed hall at the Jerusalem Regency Hotel, where he opened the final day of the Jerusalem Conference.

“What would have happened had we not built all those neighborhoods” around the central part of the capital after the Six-Day War, Netanyahu asked. “Jerusalem would have been choked.” Moreover, he said, transferring sovereignty over those areas to the Palestinian Authority is not an option.

“Everyone knows what will happen if we were to leave those areas and divide Jerusalem. Someone will enter – and that someone will be Hamas.”

Dividing the capital, or resurrecting the specter of internationalizing the “Holy Basin”, this time at the recommendation of the U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, would cause more problems even for the international community that it would solve, he added.

The three major religions of the world exist in peace, have access to all their sites, only because Jerusalem is united and under Israeli rule, Netanyahu contended, adding in deliberately Hebrew-accented English, “If it ain’t broke, don’t fix it!”

After Netanyahu's Jerusalem Conference speech, he convened with his fellow party member Dr. Yuval Steinitz and Ichud Leumi (National Union) party Chairman Yaakov Katz. Katz asked the Likud chairman what his plans are for a coalition after the Israel elections. Netanyahu responded, "We will establish a broad coalition based on all the Zionist parties - blue and orange." [Orange is the color associated with the Ichud Leumi (National Union) party and its supporters].

The meeting between Netanyahu and Katz was held in a positive atmosphere with reciprocal intentions for developing a close working relationship. Katz later told reporters, "Only a strong Ichud Leumi (National Union) in the Knesset will insure that all the good intentions of the government will be implemented."


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Israel; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: agenda; bho44; bhomiddleeast; bibi; holyland; israel
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-94 next last

There is something very “biblical” about this. Somewhere in a prophecy—either a Joel Rosenberg book, or something like it.

Not a good message either. As we used to say, “bad bongos.”


41 posted on 01/28/2009 9:24:51 AM PST by Vermont Lt (Ein Volk, Ein Riech, Ein Ein.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Filo
First off. I make no bones about it. All of Jerusalem belongs to to Jewish people and must not be divided up like a pie. End of story.

And anytime you have radical jihadists that want to run a people into the sea, there has to be a babysitter. Opening the door to an “international zone” will not give the radical Muslims what they want and their goal>> All of Israel. Some type of a green zone imaginary boundary line will not stop them from attempting to get what they want.

42 posted on 01/28/2009 9:28:50 AM PST by 444Flyer (Don't beLIEve Obama...........................................................Repent Herod!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
Holy Basin? This is pure politically correct leftist garbage!!!!!!!!!!!!
43 posted on 01/28/2009 9:30:17 AM PST by RetiredArmy (Oscuma is a Chicago gangland punk, street thug. Simple as that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vermont Lt

Try Joel Chapter 3.


44 posted on 01/28/2009 9:32:16 AM PST by 444Flyer (Don't beLIEve Obama...........................................................Repent Herod!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

“Netanyahu: Obama Will Try to Internationalize Jerusalem Sites”

Ummm..., the U.N. has been saying Jerusalem is an “International City” forever... And what on earth is an International City anyway? I don’t know of one that exists anywhere...


45 posted on 01/28/2009 9:32:21 AM PST by Star Traveler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OB1kNOb

“Would it be Washington, D.C. instead of Jerusalem, I dare say you wouldn’t embrace this idea so easily.”
Yes ! DC belongs to Maryland only ! Let’s kick the virginians out of our capital. :-)


46 posted on 01/28/2009 9:37:08 AM PST by buzzer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Filo

Jerusalem is the City of David. It belongs to the Jews who are wonderful stewards and caretakers of their guests’ religious shrines unlike the palestinian muslims who defiled and desecrated The Church of the Nativity in Bethlehem, the oldest Church in the Holy Land. Bibi, drive the muslim terrorists from all of the Holy Land given Abram by God for as far as the eye could see. God’s plan was through Abraham’s seed Isaac, not Ishmael. Zero, stay out of this.


47 posted on 01/28/2009 9:37:23 AM PST by yorkie01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: jonrick46

“We wouldn’t want something like New York City to be “internationalized?””

At leas the few acres the UN building resides are “international”. Did we ever since heard of turmoil between the people from “Roosevelt Island” and “Murray Hill” ?


48 posted on 01/28/2009 9:43:25 AM PST by buzzer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: RetiredArmy

Translation: collectivise as a baby step to UN global governance.


49 posted on 01/28/2009 9:46:05 AM PST by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: yorkie01

“God’s plan was through Abraham’s seed Isaac, not Ishmael.”

Did god tell you this today ? Maybe he meanwhile decided to go with plan b. But only god knows.


50 posted on 01/28/2009 9:46:25 AM PST by buzzer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: skeeter

Hillary Clinton is pushing this.

It is little wonder this is doomed to failure.

Bill Clinton is right to have moved on to date others.


51 posted on 01/28/2009 9:47:44 AM PST by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Integrityrocks; Filo
The temple was originally built by and a sacred site of the Jews; not Muslims. They took it over and claimed Mohammad ascended into the heavens there. Just be cause they say so, doesn't mean it trumps the original sacredness established by the Jews.

Oh, and btw, the Moslem claim about Mohammed ascending to Heaven from the "Westernmost Mosque" cannot refer to anything in Jerusalem: the Moslems didn't reach Jerusalem until 20 years after the death of that murderous child molester.

This is nothing more than yet another attempt by the Moslems to grab something that isn't theirs.

Filo, as a US citizen familiar with its history, I'd suggest that the US has absolutely no right to ask Israel to give territory to others in the interest of satisfying the demands of those others until such time as we give most of the Southwest back to Mexico. Until then, we should probably STFU.

52 posted on 01/28/2009 9:50:52 AM PST by Ancesthntr (Dedicated to stopping the Obamination and his minions from destroying the USA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Ancesthntr
Filo, as a US citizen familiar with its history, I'd suggest that the US has absolutely no right to ask Israel to give territory to others in the interest of satisfying the demands of those others until such time as we give most of the Southwest back to Mexico. Until then, we should probably STFU.

No argument there. I agree that the US should butt out.

Of course I also realize that the US has basically been buying restraint from Israel for decades so we do sort-of have a pony in the show.

But I'm not advocating this to weaken Israel and I do recognize the duplicity and untrustworthiness of Islam that others have pointed out.

I just think that the Vatican might provide a good model for the administration of the Holy Land and that by removing that burr we might be able to finally shut the Muslims up.

Yeah, I know, it's a pipe dream. . .

/sigh
53 posted on 01/28/2009 9:56:45 AM PST by Filo (Darwin was right!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Filo

What exactly are the Muslim roots there?


54 posted on 01/28/2009 9:56:53 AM PST by AmericanVictory
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Filo
The reality is that the UK position is really our position and most of the world's. Congress has passed various laws and resolutions on the status of Jerusalem essentially alligning our position with that of Israel. However, Clinton and Bush 43 have either received waviers or ignored the requirement for the US Embassy to move to Jerusalem. The reality is that Congress makes these laws and resolutions for domestic consumption but give a wink and a nod when it comes to taking any concrete action.

If the US were to unilaterally move our Embassy to Jerusalem and recoginze Israeli sovereignity over an undivided city, it would essentially end our role in any future peace negotiations and inflame the Arab world even further against us. Currently, virtually every country with diplomatic relations with Israel has its Embassy in Tel Aviv or its environs. I predict that Obama will delay any move to Jerusalem of the US Embassy just like Clinton and Bush did.

55 posted on 01/28/2009 9:57:10 AM PST by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: yorkie01
Speaking of desecrating, this is from a few months back:

“MUSLIMS URINATED NEXT TO TORAH SCROLLS AT CAVE OF PATRIARCHS” (They also left behind flags of Hamas)

Sept. 08

http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/127508

56 posted on 01/28/2009 9:58:28 AM PST by 444Flyer (Don't beLIEve Obama...........................................................Repent Herod!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: dennisw

See my post #55. The UK position is relevant because it is our de facto position despite Congressional laws and resolutions. And most of the world subscribes to the UK position. That is reality. Sorry about that.


57 posted on 01/28/2009 9:59:34 AM PST by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Filo; SJackson
The biggest obstacle to Mid East peace (beyond psychotic Muslims) is the issue of Jerusalem.

The best solution, if anyone would consider it, would be to make the whole of the old city an international zone governed equally by the three religions who have claims there. Kind-of like a Troika Vatican.

Jerusalem was bought and paid for by King David 3000 years ago.

It was purchased for and is dedicated to YHvH.

Islam following their god "Allah" is Satan
and there will always be conflict over Jerusalem.

shalom b'SHEM Yah'shua HaMashiach Adonai
58 posted on 01/28/2009 10:00:21 AM PST by Uri’el-2012 (Psalm 78:35 And they remembered that God was their ROCK, And the Most High God their Redeemer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: AmericanVictory
What exactly are the Muslim roots there?

Islam has several holy sites there, most importantly the aforementioned Dome of the Rock and Al-Aqsa Mosque.

And yes, Islam's claim is far inferior to Judaism's and Christianity's
59 posted on 01/28/2009 10:00:36 AM PST by Filo (Darwin was right!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: kabar
If the US were to unilaterally move our Embassy to Jerusalem and recoginze Israeli sovereignity over an undivided city, it would essentially end our role in any future peace negotiations and inflame the Arab world even further against us.

Oooh. Maybe that's a better idea after all! I like it! :-D
60 posted on 01/28/2009 10:02:12 AM PST by Filo (Darwin was right!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-94 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson