After all, isn't it that the argument of radical Islam?
“Even if that were the case, does his moral opposition give him the right to terrorize?
After all, isn’t it that the argument of radical Islam?”
(a) the guy clearly snapped. no one is saying it’s a fine thing to do. but I think people have some understanding of why he snapped.
(b) Islam attacks to gain territory. if it were not itself killing people, the world would be no threat to it. Islam has attacked to gain territory for 1400 years. Now is no different.
The killing of babies who have absolutely no ability to defend themselves is a moral issue infinitely beyond the mushlims desire to increase their power & territory. The guy here snapped, and I think a lot of people understand why.