Posted on 01/22/2009 7:01:08 AM PST by dascallie
I have no idea, this is just a guess.. the only reason I can suspect IF it was an honorable intention (that is a BIG IF) was that he was protecting the privacy act of 74 by not creating a precedent. I know, big stretch assuming there where honorable intentions...
In reality, IF it was legit Hawaii birth, maybe it showed his parent’s weren’t married? Didn’t want bastard jokes?
All wild guesses.
Yep, I knew the O would get to him!
"it is for the good of this country that I do this". /sarc
There. Fixed. :-)
lol.. the funny thing, with Bambi, I wouldn’t put it past him..
It may be happening as we speak in state court near Austin. There is a case in front of a state court judge filed by a young lady named Jody. Orly Taitz flew in last night from California to help her. All it takes is one case and one judge.
I find it odd that with 31 cases about Zero’s birth certificate out there, many made it to the supreme court.
Then Roberts is asked to recluse himself from giving the oath to this possible unqualified zero.
The first oath was then flubbed by transposing a word.
The second oath was not taken on a bible.
Could it be that Roberts knows what he’s doing and he has NOT made Zero the president by these two mistakes made on giving the oath?
During confirmation hearings we saw Roberts sit there and answer all questions they could throw at him without any notes or documentation in front of him. He answered every one of those questions perfectly, and he didn’t make any mistakes.
So does Roberts goof up twice on the oath of president, or does he instead not allow him to become president because of two very slight technicalities? Also, Roberts did this in the full light of day with everyone watching.
The Bible isn’t Constitutionally required for the swearing in re the second oath. It was interesting that it wasn’t used unless it simply was a spur of the moment thing.
If you find a copy of that segment anywhere, would you give me a ping, please? :) Would love to see it.
scotus cares enough to do over the oath, to make sure obama is actually “the president”, yet they appear to not care enough to check his BC to make sure he is “eligible” to be president.
his dad was already married, so BO was in effect a “b”.
marriage wasn’t legal.
“Didn’t think anyone would take it seriously.”
Two days ago you might have been right. But two days ago, I NEVER would have imagined something so outrageous as the subject of this thread would happen so SOON!
(Is it still too early to start shooting?)
That’s what we know now, I am curious what the BC says officially. IE, was he legally documented a bastard? :->
If it was a fraud, then the constitutional procedure for undoing that fraud and removing him from office is the impeachment process. The courts have no jurisdiction at this point in removing Obama from the White House. That is solely the constitutional prerogative of the Congress.
Or don't you believe in the Constitution?
It’s still on the docket according to this.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/bloggers/2169320/posts?page=15#15
The court cannot remove the president.
They can merely rule his acts are not binding because he does not meet the qualifications- when presented with a suit seeking such relief of course.
what a potential mess.
Alan Keyes needs to be drumrolled out of the conservative movement—that bloody idiot gave us Obama...
If Jack Ryan had toughed it out and stayed in the race, he would have cleaned Barack’s clock—and he’d still be hustling race baiting in Hyde Park and diddling around with Bill Ayers over Illinois education... Remeber, that senate seat was in Republican hands before Barack Obama took it..
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=miauPAog1Wo
My god it is worse than that quote..she goes on to say it was free...first thing I think...is..we have black president..it’s free!
I think later she tries to claim it was given to all platform guests...maybe she was one of them.
I've just followed the constitutional issues of this, not particulars of the cases.
By the way, Barbara Walters has freely admitted for years that she has stolen stuff from the white house ..
Like here:
None made it to the Supreme Court. They were all denied.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.