Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

That Shrinking Feeling: Time, Newsweek Narrow Their Focus
Washington Post ^ | 1/19/2009 | Howard Kurtz

Posted on 01/21/2009 5:44:53 AM PST by Menehune56

NEW YORK -- When Rick Stengel joined Time in 1981, every story in progress filled a thick binder -- the reporter's version, the editor's rewritten version, the top editors' version, the fact-checked version -- that would be unimaginable in today's cut-to-the-bone corporate culture. (snip)

When Jon Meacham joined Newsweek in 1995, "there was a phrase in the culture -- 'We need to get something in on X' -- that we never use anymore," he says. The days of a "newsmagazine of record," Meacham says, are long gone. (snip)

Morale in both shops has been devastated as staffers complain about a blurred identity, lack of direction, management snafus and outsourcing to big-name writers that has left them wondering if reporters still have much of a role.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: illiterateamerica; mainstreammedia
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-39 last
To: Crawdad
He sees his audience as "the virtual Beltway," which he defines as people who watch Sunday talk shows, read newspapers and buy hardcover books.

Yeah, basically he's describing Freepers, and I doubt any of us read Time or Newsweek except at the dentist's office.

21 posted on 01/21/2009 6:14:20 AM PST by Rummyfan (Iraq: it's not about Iraq anymore, it's about the USA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Menehune56

When I picked up my copy of the Houston Chronicle yesterday, the one with the picture of “the one” on the front, I seems even smaller that it was last week. Saving paper, saving ink, I hope the liberal rag goes broke.


22 posted on 01/21/2009 6:14:22 AM PST by Ditter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gondring
Actually I agree with you, Gondring. It is satisfying to see someone get their much deserved comeuppance but a shame that the innocent along with guilty get punished.

I read Newsweek for almost 30 years until I realized something was very wrong with this supposed "news" magazine at the end of the Lewinsky scandal. They switched from decent investigative reporting to overtly shilling for Clinton. I now get more interesting and even diversity of opinion in National Review.

23 posted on 01/21/2009 6:21:26 AM PST by Menehune56 ("Let them hate so long as they fear" (Oderint Dum Metuant), Lucius Accius, (170 BC - 86 BC))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Menehune56

When you consistently go out of your way to stick a finger in the eye of the 60 million people that didn’t vote for Obama, well, I guess that’s gonna leave a mark, huh?


24 posted on 01/21/2009 6:29:04 AM PST by Obadiah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Menehune56

I quit my subscription to Newsweek after the “Koran in the toilet” fiction (which resulted in numerous deaths around the world).


25 posted on 01/21/2009 6:38:52 AM PST by Sigurdrifta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Menehune56
Dear Wash Post, Newsweek, Time, et al...

Boo-freakin'-hoo. Welcome to the real world, outside your precious beltway.

26 posted on 01/21/2009 6:41:19 AM PST by theDentist (Qwerty ergo typo : I type, therefore I misspelll)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Menehune56

“That Shrinking Feeling: Time, Newsweek Narrow Their Focus”

Yep, they’ve done that alright. Standard fare: Obama pic on front cover, Obama-related feature headlining the interior, with small remainder of copy dedicated to bashing conservatives. Formula all the way.


27 posted on 01/21/2009 6:42:57 AM PST by ScottinVA (All I needed to know about islam I learned on 9-11.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Menehune56
Now that the opposition is effectively defunct, there's nothing left for them but to become overt Obamaganda rags.

And there's already plenty of competition in that arena.

I weep bitter tears for them. /sarc
28 posted on 01/21/2009 6:46:52 AM PST by Antoninus (America didn't turn away from conservatism, they turned away from many who faked it. - Mark Sanford)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rummyfan
I doubt any of us read Time or Newsweek except at the dentist's office.

I find anyone in my waiting room with either such magazine, no matter who brought it in..... once the leather straps are in place, NO NOVACAINE and LOTS OF CENTRALIZED, EXCRUTIATING, SEERINGLY EXQUISITE PAIN.


29 posted on 01/21/2009 6:53:36 AM PST by theDentist (Qwerty ergo typo : I type, therefore I misspelll)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Gondring
I fear that we are facing a future of Americans get their news from sound bytes, The Daily Show, entertainment websites, and Saturday Night Live skits, rather than any in-depth source.

The ignorant masses getting their news from sound bites and SNL skits is no less damaging as the propaganda, twisted versions, or fiction "reported" by the bias MSM. At least the innocent or naive will know that they are living in an information vacuum.
30 posted on 01/21/2009 8:02:14 AM PST by SisterK (building an underground economy one brick at a time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Menehune56
...until I realized something was very wrong with this supposed "news" magazine at the end of the Lewinsky scandal.

I ended my subscription during Bush I's admin. They called me for two years trying to get me to resub.

31 posted on 01/21/2009 8:24:23 AM PST by FrogMom (Lord, help us all!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Crawdad
He sees his audience as "the virtual Beltway," which he defines as people who watch Sunday talk shows, read newspapers and buy hardcover books.

Unreal.

I agree it is unreal, but it's also correct. There was a period when these magazines were interesting and informative. Only Margaret Carlson and Eleanor Clift were the token liberal columnists who regularly bashed the Republicans.

Now, the News magazines seem to harp only on politics, and generally are supportive of the extreme left doctrines.

32 posted on 01/21/2009 8:31:35 AM PST by FLCowboy, (The gutsiest Republican is a woman from Alaska.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Ursus

LOL! So true!


33 posted on 01/21/2009 1:30:49 PM PST by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Ursus

Got that right . LOL. Don’t read em don’t weep ;)


34 posted on 01/21/2009 2:55:50 PM PST by Deetes (God Bless the Troops)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

I’m wishing they go flat broke. They make me sick. They’ve groveled long enough for Obama. They deserve to fail. I hope they all go begging at street corners. Ditto, the NY Times. I won’t even pick it up even if I find a free copy lying about. The only national paper I can stand is the Wall Street Journal. And will this warm fuzzy love fest for Obama ever end? The fourth estate has never been this biased, never!


35 posted on 01/21/2009 7:20:09 PM PST by donaldo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MarkL
That was when they responded to the outcry against the outrageously unfair article by stating for the record that gun control was too important an issue to report fairly, and that TIME would continue to push for strict gun control.
Is there an actual quote for this?
36 posted on 02/15/2009 6:36:06 PM PST by dbz77
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: dbz77
Is there an actual quote for this?

I'm having trouble finding any sort of "a quote," but I remember the letter being published, I believe by the NRA, or some other group. It was a form letter sent out to angry subscribers, and many people canceled their subscriptions over this.

Mark

37 posted on 02/16/2009 2:53:47 PM PST by MarkL (Do I really look like a guy with a plan?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Gondring

I agree with you to a point, yes I hate the low quality news reporting. I picked up a magazine during my last trip to my doctor, it was open to a business story. I read the article, then looked to see who had published it. I was surpised to see it was Business Week, I used to subscribe it, but quit shortly after I sold my business. It was a pale imitation of the magazine I used to read regularly, it was/is a copy of People style, nothing to long, no depth, just about people in the story, with no back story, no stats to back up their claims. Business Week used to be aimed at upper management and was expensive compared to other magazines. I asked my doctor, why he subscribed to it and he replied,that he didn’t, every magazine in his waiting room was sent to him free.

My point is they chose the business model, hoping to expand their readership. These magazine were once aimed at educated people, now they are aimed at People readers. I started Newsweek in high school, because it was required reading for my civics’ class and continued, until I could read it in five minutes. There was nothing in it to inform me on any subject, just a few paragraphs explaining one side of a story.


38 posted on 02/16/2009 3:46:40 PM PST by razorback-bert (Save the planet...it is the only known one with beer!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: MarkL
I'm having trouble finding any sort of "a quote," but I remember the letter being published, I believe by the NRA, or some other group. It was a form letter sent out to angry subscribers, and many people canceled their subscriptions over this.
If people wanted biased news, they could read newsletters from the RNC, DNC, Handgun Control, Inc., the Daily Worker, or the National Vanguard.
39 posted on 02/16/2009 5:46:46 PM PST by dbz77
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-39 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson