Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama Cannot Fulfill Vow to Put Homosexuals in Military Unless Congress Changes the Law
CNS News ^ | 1/19/2009 | Matt Cover

Posted on 01/19/2009 4:07:56 AM PST by markomalley

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-44 next last
To: Future Snake Eater

I’m telling you from 20 years in the USAF, that having women (and homosexuals) in units under my command had NO appreciable effect on cohesion or morale. If you try to convince me otherwise, I place the blame squarely on unit commanders who tolerate it or quietly encourage it.


21 posted on 01/19/2009 5:22:18 AM PST by CholeraJoe ("They taped over your mouth, Scribbled out the truth with their lies. You little spies!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: MAD-AS-HELL

I’ve finally figured out why the Left wants gays in the military. It’s the one institution they don’t own lock, stock, and barrel. If they infiltrate their own into it, as they’ve done with the government, the media, and the schools, they have eliminated the last great powerful institution that can stop the march to world socialism.


22 posted on 01/19/2009 5:24:40 AM PST by Hardastarboard (Why do I find the Toyota "Saved by Zero" ads so ironic?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: markomalley
...fulfill this promise unless Congress passes new legislation

Exactly! That's why he said he'd do it. He knows it won't get through Congress, so it buys him political capital for a song (probably by YMCA).

23 posted on 01/19/2009 5:27:07 AM PST by theDentist (Qwerty ergo typo : I type, therefore I misspelll)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: theDentist
He knows it won't get through Congress,

In THIS Congress? You have got to be kidding me...

My prediction: a standalone bill won't pass, but it will be a little-noticed paragraph in next year's Defense Appropriations Bill (why? because (R)'s won't dare vote against it...otherwise they won't be "supporting the troops")

24 posted on 01/19/2009 5:29:52 AM PST by markomalley (Extra ecclesiam nulla salus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: CholeraJoe
I’m telling you from 20 years in the USAF, that having women (and homosexuals) in units under my command had NO appreciable effect on cohesion or morale.

Shipboard life is totally different.

25 posted on 01/19/2009 5:33:10 AM PST by CPOSharky (Coming up: Four years of Jimmuh Cartah on crack.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

Comment #26 Removed by Moderator

To: CholeraJoe
I’m telling you from 20 years in the USAF, that having women (and homosexuals) in units under my command had NO appreciable effect on cohesion or morale. If you try to convince me otherwise, I place the blame squarely on unit commanders who tolerate it or quietly encourage it.

It all comes down to leadership, no doubt about it.

We're about to find out how little leadership ability 44 has, as evidenced by his propensity for "present" votes. It's showing in his "revised and extended" remarks about GITMO, and going after Bin Laden.

27 posted on 01/19/2009 5:34:35 AM PST by Night Hides Not (Don't blame me...I voted for Palin!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: CholeraJoe

I don’t doubt that homosexuals serve in the military, as a matter of fact I know they do but they are very discreet and that seems to work. I think the integration of blacks has been more successful than the integration of women and perhaps it is because of sexual orientation. The cohesiveness and comradery I noticed in the 80’s (before tailgate) has lessened. Now we have PC training ad nauseam and the comradery has changed since then. I don’t know if it’s better or worse in the long run, but sometimes I miss the old days.


28 posted on 01/19/2009 5:44:20 AM PST by Alissa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: jrg

And privets shouldn’t to play with other privets privets.
larry the cable guy


29 posted on 01/19/2009 5:44:44 AM PST by Vaduz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Polybius

Hey, I’m a skinny hetrosexual old military retiree. I don’t want to be recalled. Maybe I had better get some survival gear ready and head (no pun there guys) for the hills.


30 posted on 01/19/2009 5:56:35 AM PST by hdstmf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

As long as he says what they want to hear, they don’t really care if he never actually accomplishes anything.


31 posted on 01/19/2009 5:58:57 AM PST by Carley (Remember when we had a real President)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Voter#537; markomalley
"For me, I’m just glad I’m retired and too old and fat to be recalled to active duty

I am a shorttimer myself. After 35+ years in the military, I am so happy to be getting out instead of having to face four years under this poser.

The Fool is going to discover that there are a lot of promises he made that he won't be able to keep. This will be an interesting 4 years. . . . . . . .

I guess none of us can expect that tax cut b[end] 0[ver] promised to 95% of the people either. He sure is lowering expectations early.

32 posted on 01/19/2009 6:37:59 AM PST by Arrowhead1952 (BO is not and will never be my president.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: CholeraJoe

I also served in the USAF for 20 years. I experienced the effects of intergrating blacks and women into the ranks. Those were given special preference in performance reports, promotions and assignments. Supervisors to senior officers endangered their own careers if they showed the slightest hint of resistance to the political correctness of the times. None of us non-favored class dared speak of the “quota” system. We were often passed over while incompetent peers rose in the ranks. Their numbers grew and multiplied the situation. Carter and Clinton policies devastated the best of the military. I have no doubt Obama and the demorat congress will push the gay agenda on to the military.

I expect the addition of a gay affairs office, a gay bath house recreational center, gay days, gay parades, pink ribbons, and special sections of performance reports...
It may sound extreme now, but don’t be surprized with the
weirdos being handed the power.


33 posted on 01/19/2009 6:38:41 AM PST by hdstmf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: jrg

Without a lisp.


34 posted on 01/19/2009 6:40:55 AM PST by sniper63 (Silent and stealthy - one shot - one kill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: CholeraJoe

Are race and gender really the same as behavior?


35 posted on 01/19/2009 6:52:41 AM PST by ExpatGator (Extending logic since 1961.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: CholeraJoe

I had the exact opposite experience during my military service. Before you through the phobe flag: I do not give a rat’s patoot who is doing who or how they do it. I’m pretty much libertarian on the subject.

My shipboard experience saw numerous instances of MAJOR problems caused by homosexuals and their behavior and my shore duty experiences saw many problems caused by the presence of females and homosexuals. I was repeatedly hit on by homosexuals/bisexuals and a female commissioned officer who were in my chain of command (various commands). I saw people not advanced or hounded and given bad evals due to the fact that they did not want to play bi-games with bisexual males in their chain of command. I saw these events with my own eyes.

Your experiences are not the end all of what goes on. Our opinions are colored by our experiences, and vice versa.


36 posted on 01/19/2009 7:07:27 AM PST by ExpatGator (Extending logic since 1961.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: markomalley
Law was written by Sam Nunn of Georgia, a man that should have not been a democrat. Started to point this out to people, but they all think the don't ask don't tell BS put out by clintoon was the law, it wasn't.
37 posted on 01/19/2009 7:32:11 AM PST by org.whodat (Conservatives don't vote for Bailouts for Super-Rich Bankers! Republicans do!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hdstmf
Hey, I’m a skinny hetrosexual old military retiree. I don’t want to be recalled.

My wife's grandfather, an old "pig boat" Chief, fit that description some time around 1937. Has was in for a very rude awakening in 1942 when the Navy dragged his old, skinny @ss back into active duty.

He should have read the fine print regarding the Regular Navy Retired List:

"Regular Navy Retired List — Any enlisted member of the regular Navy who has completed at least 30 years of active federal service may be retired upon application. Unlike transfer to the Fleet Reserve, the 30-year retirement is a right guaranteed by law. As a retired member, you may be ordered to active duty in time of war or national emergency at the discretion of the Secretary of the Navy."

He managed to claim he was too old to go back into subs but he spent the rest of the war in a sub tender in the South Pacific. He never forgave the Navy until the day he died.

38 posted on 01/19/2009 8:20:54 AM PST by Polybius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: MAD-AS-HELL
I actually want gays to be in the military.

They are already there. The first time I ever met a flamer, I was in Basic Training.

39 posted on 01/19/2009 8:44:53 AM PST by Sarajevo (You're just jealous because the voices only talk to me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Sarajevo

Let me clarify, I know that gays are in the military but not openly. I am sure that many are fine soldiers. And I am sure many are not as there are many heteros that aren’t fine soldiers either. My point is to see if the those who are the activists line up to join.

And per your comment, should I assume the one gay person you knew wasn’t a good soldier?


40 posted on 01/19/2009 9:35:40 AM PST by MAD-AS-HELL (How does one win over terrorists? KILL them with UNKINDNESS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-44 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson