Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Disney CEO received $51.1M in compensation in 2008
http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D95OJM081&show_article=1 ^ | Jan 16 08:52 PM US/Eastern | By RYAN NAKASHIMA

Posted on 01/17/2009 12:40:10 PM PST by television is just wrong

LOS ANGELES (AP) - The Walt Disney Co.'s chief executive, Robert Iger, received a compensation package worth $51.1 million in fiscal 2008, up 85 percent from a year earlier, but most of it came in stock options that are currently worthless, according to a regulatory filing made Friday. Iger received the option to buy 3 million shares at $29.51 each on Jan. 31 last year when he agreed to a new five-year contract through 2013, the Burbank, Calif.-based company said in a filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Those and other options, which were estimated to be worth $34.4 million when they were granted, are currently worth nothing because the shares closed Friday at $21.46. According to the filing, Iger also declined a $2.4 million bonus related to total shareholder return. Disney shares have dipped 34 percent since the fiscal year ended Sept. 27. "He thought it was the appropriate thing to do," said Disney spokesman Jonathan Friedland. Over the fiscal year, the share price slipped 2.3 percent, to $32.75 from $33.52. Disney's annual revenue grew 7 percent to $37.8 billion while net profit fell 5.5 percent to $4.43 billion. Iger received a salary of $2 million, non-equity incentive plan compensation of $13.9 million, and other compensation of $773,090, the filing said. The executive's other compensation included $107,897 for air travel, $645,368 for security and another $14,400 in reimbursements for such expenses as health club membership and annual physical exams.

(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bonuses; ceo; disney; economy; titleisjustwrong
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last
with this economy, maybe he should just take half that and reinvest the rest into the company so that so many employees are not laid off...
1 posted on 01/17/2009 12:40:11 PM PST by television is just wrong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: television is just wrong

Half of what? Most of that compensation package was worthless paper!


2 posted on 01/17/2009 12:42:09 PM PST by Spktyr (Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Spktyr

still more than most of the companies workers get.


3 posted on 01/17/2009 12:45:18 PM PST by television is just wrong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: television is just wrong
Disney CEO received $51.1M in compensation in 2008
4 posted on 01/17/2009 12:46:10 PM PST by A.A. Cunningham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: television is just wrong
The Walt Disney Co.'s chief executive, Robert Iger, received a compensation package worth $51.1 million in fiscal 2008, up 85 percent from a year earlier, but most of it came in stock options that are currently worthless...

So, is it worth 51 million or is it worthless?

5 posted on 01/17/2009 12:46:15 PM PST by raybbr (It's going to get a lot worse now that the anchor babies are voting!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: television is just wrong

So? Considering the turnaround Iger’s managed to do for Disney since that worthless Eisner got the boot, I’d say he might deserve what he’s being paid.


6 posted on 01/17/2009 12:49:05 PM PST by Spktyr (Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: television is just wrong

At least the money didn’t go to that worthless, lying, gun controlling liberal scumbag Michael Eisner.


7 posted on 01/17/2009 12:51:16 PM PST by Hardastarboard (Why do I find the Toyota "Saved by Zero" ads so ironic?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: television is just wrong

No one on the face of this planet is worth giving that much money to.


8 posted on 01/17/2009 1:02:10 PM PST by lilylangtree (Veni, Vidi, Vici)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hardastarboard

No, but you can be sure some of it went to elect “the one.”


9 posted on 01/17/2009 1:04:12 PM PST by anniegetyourgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: television is just wrong
Robert Iger, received a compensation package worth $51.1 million in fiscal 2008, but most of it came in stock options that are currently worthless, according to a regulatory filing made Friday. Iger received the option to buy 3 million shares at $29.51 each on Jan. 31 last year when he agreed to a new five-year contract through 2013, the Burbank, Calif.-based company said in a filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Those and other options, which were estimated to be worth $34.4 million when they were granted, are currently worth nothing because the shares closed Friday at $21.46.

Why do reports like this make my head hurt?

10 posted on 01/17/2009 1:05:19 PM PST by missnry (The truth will set you free ... and drive liberals Crazy!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: television is just wrong
"maybe he should just take half that and reinvest the rest into the company so that so many employees are not laid off..."

The company invested in Iger so that many more employees are not laid off. Why pay for employees you don't need?

Maybe people of the special class that received stimulus checks last year should return them to the people who created the wealth.


11 posted on 01/17/2009 1:11:23 PM PST by I see my hands (_8(|)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: television is just wrong

It’s a gotcha headline that is totally misleading. I suppose the writer is hoping that his or her readers have the attention span of..”of, well newspaper readers”


12 posted on 01/17/2009 1:12:41 PM PST by GoforBroke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lilylangtree

Nobody is “giving” him anything — he’s earning it.

A) If he creates value for shareholders, then he’s worth.

B) It’s not about fair. Anybody is worth as much as they can negotiate.


13 posted on 01/17/2009 1:22:28 PM PST by durasell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: lilylangtree
"No one on the face of this planet is worth giving that much money to."

Who "gave" him the money? Did someone just walk up to him and say "here ya go!"?

14 posted on 01/17/2009 1:25:49 PM PST by Sam's Army
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Sam's Army

The better question is who established the salary? Again, I repeat, no one presiding over a public company should be given that much money because they’re NOT WORTH IT!


15 posted on 01/17/2009 1:27:26 PM PST by lilylangtree (Veni, Vidi, Vici)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: lilylangtree
"Again, I repeat, no one presiding over a public company should be given that much money because they’re NOT WORTH IT!"

And what does your W-2 say for 2008, comrade? I guarantee you someone in Washington thinks you aren't worth it, either.

16 posted on 01/17/2009 1:29:37 PM PST by Sam's Army
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: lilylangtree

The board sets the salary.

Who establishes worth? If he is capable of making decisions that add a billion dollars to a company’s profits, then he’s certainly worth the expense.

Think about what a movie exec does. He gets a pile of hundred and twenty pieces of paper with words on it and decides whether or not to spend $50 to $100 million dollars or more to turn the paper into a very, very long piece of plastic with pictures on it.


17 posted on 01/17/2009 1:31:58 PM PST by durasell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: lilylangtree
No one on the face of this planet is worth giving that much money to.

Says who? Who is going to decide the worth of another person? You? Bureaucrats?

I'm still amazed at statements like these that prove a rather significant misunderstanding of free-market principles and the concept of economic liberty.

18 posted on 01/17/2009 1:35:45 PM PST by SaveTheChief (Chief Illiniwek (1926-2007))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: missnry

So three million shares at $21.46 are worthless? Can somebody explain that to me? Please!


19 posted on 01/17/2009 1:36:52 PM PST by mefistofelerevised
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: mefistofelerevised

The shares are only worth something if the price of the stock rises above $21.46. If you received an option to buy three million shares at $21.46 in Citi two years ago, it was a pretty good deal — the stock was trading at $50+. A nifty profit. The same deal today, with the stock at $5.00 is a joke.


20 posted on 01/17/2009 1:39:28 PM PST by durasell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson