I checked out the individual you mentioned above once she started in on the eligibility threads, and noted that she had posted almost exclusively on the Fair Tax threads for many pp of comments. I can’t grasp that stuff so I didn’t bother to read the comments, then someone else up the this thread mentioned about the Alinsky methods on the Fair Tax threads so I put two and two together.
Another thing I’ve noted is the attempts to get Polarik to reveal his real name, etc. One person - I think the lucy person - when I said that no one knew Buckhead’s real name - said that Buckhead’s findings weren’t that great anyway, or words to that effect.
If people don’t think that Polarik’s analysis has any value unless he reveals his legal name, then their freaking opinions have no value unless they reveal their names. I’ve invited one person who trolls those threads occasionally to pony up with his personal info, if opinions are worthless without it.
(Courtesy pink to Polarik.)
Thanks, LJ, you are right about the trolls (and I could care less what they call me), but you might wish to check with Lucy herself about Buckhead as that was before my time on Free Republic, as I joined in mid-June as the Hannity forum I started on was way behind the curve on the birth certificate issue. BTW, I've CC:ed her with this reply.
Actually, could you be thinking of Lucysmom? (different FReeper)
Noting that Polarik doesn't use his real name does not equal an attempt to get him to reveal his real name.
Re Buckhead - I said like a stopped clock he turned out to be right, however his analysis was flawed. I stand by that statement.
If people don’t think that Polarik’s analysis has any value unless he reveals his legal name, then their freaking opinions have no value unless they reveal their names.
Just curious about the credentials of someone who makes a claim that runs counter to my experience.
BTW, isn't it accepted practice to ping the person you're talking about?