[lucysmom]

Another thing I’ve noted is the attempts to get Polarik to reveal his real name, etc. One person - I think the lucy person - when I said that no one knew Buckhead’s real name - said that Buckhead’s findings weren’t that great anyway, or words to that effect.

Noting that Polarik doesn't use his real name does not equal an attempt to get him to reveal his real name.

Re Buckhead - I said like a stopped clock he turned out to be right, however his analysis was flawed. I stand by that statement.

If people don’t think that Polarik’s analysis has any value unless he reveals his legal name, then their freaking opinions have no value unless they reveal their names.

Just curious about the credentials of someone who makes a claim that runs counter to my experience.

BTW, isn't it accepted practice to ping the person you're talking about?

[little jeremiah]

How Buckhead’s analysis flawed? That’s not how I remember it.
And what are you talking about when you say “counter to my experience”?

[Star Traveler]

You said — “BTW, isn’t it accepted practice to ping the person you’re talking about?”

Maybe so, but certain ones don’t acknowledge the courtesy, it seems. I guess it’s like talking in a corner in low whispers...

In any case, there are certain ones who “get crazy” because someone doesn’t have the same idea as them — and then posts an idea that is different from them. Now, *that* is the real crime... doncha know...

Whatever you do, don’t have an idea of your own... :-)